Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network [3]This version of ATcT results[4] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.128 [5,6] to include with the calculations provided in reference [4].
|
Bromide |
Formula: Br- (aq) |
CAS RN: 24959-67-9 |
ATcT ID: 24959-67-9*800 |
SMILES: [Br-] |
InChI: InChI=1S/BrH/h1H/p-1 |
InChIKey: CPELXLSAUQHCOX-UHFFFAOYSA-M |
InChI: InChI=1S/Br/q-1 |
InChIKey: FXWOFHDSFFRUFQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
Hills Formula: Br1- |
2D Image: |
|
Aliases: Br-; Bromide; Bromide ion; Bromide anion; Bromide ion (1-); Perbromide; Perbromide ion; Perbromide anion; Perbromide ion (1-); Bromine atom cation; Bromine atom ion (1-); Bromine cation; Bromine ion (1-); Atomic bromine cation; Atomic bromine ion (1-); Monobromine cation; Monobromine ion (1-) |
Relative Molecular Mass: 79.90455 ± 0.00100 |
ΔfH°(0 K) | ΔfH°(298.15 K) | Uncertainty | Units |
---|
| -120.84 | ± 0.14 | kJ/mol |
|
Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of Br- (aq)The 20 contributors listed below account only for 66.5% of the provenance of ΔfH° of Br- (aq). A total of 155 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.
Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.
|
Contribution (%) | TN ID | Reaction | Measured Quantity | Reference | 8.9 | 1095.2 | Br2 (cr,l) → Br2 (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 7.386 ± 0.027 kcal/mol | Hildenbrand 1958 | 7.1 | 1186.1 | Cl2 (g) + 2 Br- (aq) → Br2 (cr,l) + 2 Cl- (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -91.29 ± 0.40 (×2.538) kJ/mol | Johnson 1963, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals | 7.1 | 1186.2 | Cl2 (g) + 2 Br- (aq) → Br2 (cr,l) + 2 Cl- (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -91.29 ± 0.80 (×1.269) kJ/mol | Sunner 1964, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals | 6.0 | 1125.1 | HBr (g) → HBr (aq, 2570 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -20.286 ± 0.012 kcal/mol | Vanderzee 1963 | 5.2 | 1196.1 | [HBr]+ (g) → H (g) + Br+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 31394.5 ± 20 (×1.795) cm-1 | Haugh 1971, Norling 1935 | 4.9 | 5947.1 | CH3Br (g) → [CH3]+ (g) + Br (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 12.834 ± 0.002 eV | Song 2001 | 4.7 | 1129.1 | HBr (aq, 3000 H2O) → HBr (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -0.239 ± 0.040 kJ/mol | NBS Tables 1989, Parker 1965, NBS TN270 | 3.9 | 8938.1 | S(O)(OH)2 (aq, 2500 H2O) + Br2 (cr,l) + H2O (cr,l) → OS(O)(OH)2 (aq, 2500 H2O) + 2 HBr (aq, 1250 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -55.47 ± 0.11 (×2.768) kcal/mol | Johnson 1963 | 2.9 | 1122.1 | 1/2 H2 (g) + 1/2 Br2 (cr,l) → HBr (aq)  | ΔrG°(298.15 K) = -102.81 ± 0.80 kJ/mol | Jones 1934, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals | 1.8 | 1186.3 | Cl2 (g) + 2 Br- (aq) → Br2 (cr,l) + 2 Cl- (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -91.55 ± 2.00 kJ/mol | Thomsen 1882, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals | 1.8 | 5940.6 | 4 CH3Cl (g) → CCl4 (g) + 3 CH4 (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.52 ± 0.30 kcal/mol | Karton 2017 | 1.7 | 1340.1 | Br2 (cr,l) + 3 I- (aq) → [I3]- (aq) + 2 Br- (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -29.355 ± 0.364 kcal/mol | Wu 1963 | 1.6 | 1120.1 | 1/2 H2 (g) + 1/2 Br2 (g) → HBr (g)  | ΔrH°(376.15 K) = -12.470 ± 0.170 (×1.091) kcal/mol | Lacher 1956a, Lacher 1956 | 1.3 | 1113.12 | HBr (g) → H (g) + Br (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 86.47 ± 0.2 kcal/mol | Feller 2008 | 1.3 | 1114.6 | HBr (g) + Cl (g) → HCl (g) + Br (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -15.68 ± 0.2 kcal/mol | Feller 2008 | 1.3 | 1284.1 | HI (g) + Br (g) → HBr (g) + I (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -16.14 ± 0.2 kcal/mol | Feller 2008 | 1.2 | 1196.3 | [HBr]+ (g) → H (g) + Br+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 31358 ± 15 (×4.861) cm-1 | Penno 1998, Norling 1935, est unc | 1.0 | 6277.1 | CH3CH2Br (g) → [CH3CH2]+ (g) + Br (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 11.130 ± 0.005 eV | Baer 2000 | 1.0 | 2305.1 | CH4 (g) + Br (g) → CH3 (g) + HBr (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 5929 ± 80 cm-1 | Czako 2013 | 0.9 | 2020.2 | [ON(O)O]- (g) + HBr (g) → Br- (g) + HON(O)O (g)  | ΔrH°(391 K) = -1.03 ± 0.21 kcal/mol | Davidson 1977, 2nd Law |
|
Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of Br- (aq) |
Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances. The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.
|
Correlation Coefficent (%) | Species Name | Formula | Image | ΔfH°(0 K) | ΔfH°(298.15 K) | Uncertainty | Units | Relative Molecular Mass | ATcT ID | 100.0 | Hydrogen bromide | HBr (aq) | | | -120.84 | ± 0.14 | kJ/mol | 80.9119 ± 0.0010 | 10035-10-6*800 | 95.7 | Hydrogen bromide | HBr (aq, 3000 H2O) | | | -120.60 | ± 0.14 | kJ/mol | 80.9119 ± 0.0010 | 10035-10-6*842 | 95.7 | Hydrogen bromide | HBr (aq, 50000 H2O) | | | -120.78 | ± 0.14 | kJ/mol | 80.9119 ± 0.0010 | 10035-10-6*855 | 95.7 | Hydrogen bromide | HBr (aq, 100 H2O) | | | -119.85 | ± 0.14 | kJ/mol | 80.9119 ± 0.0010 | 10035-10-6*828 | 95.7 | Hydrogen bromide | HBr (aq, 7000 H2O) | | | -120.68 | ± 0.14 | kJ/mol | 80.9119 ± 0.0010 | 10035-10-6*846 | 95.7 | Hydrogen bromide | HBr (aq, 20000 H2O) | | | -120.74 | ± 0.14 | kJ/mol | 80.9119 ± 0.0010 | 10035-10-6*852 | 95.7 | Hydrogen bromide | HBr (aq, 150 H2O) | | | -120.01 | ± 0.14 | kJ/mol | 80.9119 ± 0.0010 | 10035-10-6*829 | 95.7 | Hydrogen bromide | HBr (aq, 5000 H2O) | | | -120.65 | ± 0.14 | kJ/mol | 80.9119 ± 0.0010 | 10035-10-6*844 | 95.7 | Hydrogen bromide | HBr (aq, 600 H2O) | | | -120.35 | ± 0.14 | kJ/mol | 80.9119 ± 0.0010 | 10035-10-6*834 | 95.7 | Hydrogen bromide | HBr (aq, 75 H2O) | | | -119.70 | ± 0.14 | kJ/mol | 80.9119 ± 0.0010 | 10035-10-6*825 |
|
Most Influential reactions involving Br- (aq)Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.
|
Influence Coefficient | TN ID | Reaction | Measured Quantity | Reference | 1.000 | 1121.1 | HBr (aq) → H+ (aq) + Br- (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 0.000 ± 0.000 kcal/mol | triv | 0.999 | 1194.1 | Br2 (aq) + Br- (aq) → [Br3]- (aq)  | ΔrG°(298.15 K) = -7.150 ± 0.025 kJ/mol | Mussini 1966, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals | 0.786 | 1704.5 | (NH4)Br (cr) → [NH4]+ (aq) + Br- (aq)  | ΔrG°(298.15 K) = -7.849 ± 0.040 kJ/mol | CODATA Key Vals | 0.277 | 1340.1 | Br2 (cr,l) + 3 I- (aq) → [I3]- (aq) + 2 Br- (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -29.355 ± 0.364 kcal/mol | Wu 1963 | 0.199 | 1704.3 | (NH4)Br (cr) → [NH4]+ (aq) + Br- (aq)  | ΔrG°(298.15 K) = -1.883 ± 0.019 kcal/mol | Shults 1966, Stephenson 1968, est unc | 0.073 | 1186.1 | Cl2 (g) + 2 Br- (aq) → Br2 (cr,l) + 2 Cl- (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -91.29 ± 0.40 (×2.538) kJ/mol | Johnson 1963, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals | 0.073 | 1186.2 | Cl2 (g) + 2 Br- (aq) → Br2 (cr,l) + 2 Cl- (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -91.29 ± 0.80 (×1.269) kJ/mol | Sunner 1964, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals | 0.018 | 1186.3 | Cl2 (g) + 2 Br- (aq) → Br2 (cr,l) + 2 Cl- (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -91.55 ± 2.00 kJ/mol | Thomsen 1882, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals | 0.004 | 1704.2 | (NH4)Br (cr) → [NH4]+ (aq) + Br- (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 4.007 ± 0.015 (×8.175) kcal/mol | Stephenson 1968 | 0.004 | 1704.4 | (NH4)Br (cr) → [NH4]+ (aq) + Br- (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 4.01 ± 0.10 (×1.242) kcal/mol | Parker 1965, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals | 0.000 | 1194.2 | Br2 (aq) + Br- (aq) → [Br3]- (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -7.53 ± 0.30 (×3.748) kJ/mol | Vasilev 1973, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals |
|
|
References
|
1
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004)
[DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
|
2
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005)
[DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
|
3
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2023; available at ATcT.anl.gov [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1997229]
|
4
|
|
N. Genossar, P. B. Changala, B. Gans, J.-C. Loison, S. Hartweg, M.-A. Martin-Drumel, G. A. Garcia, J. F. Stanton, B. Ruscic, and J. H. Baraban
Ring-Opening Dynamics of the Cyclopropyl Radical and Cation: the Transition State Nature of the Cyclopropyl Cation
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18518-18525 (2022)
[DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c07740]
|
5
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross
Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects.
Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021)
[DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
|
6
|
|
J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton,
Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions
J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021)
[DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
|
7
|
|
B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014)
[DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
|
8
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019)
[DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]
|
|
|
Formula
|
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
|
|
Uncertainties
|
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
|
|
Website Functionality Credits
|
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
|
|
Acknowledgement
|
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.
|