Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[4] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.128 [5,6] to include with the calculations provided in reference [4].

Bromomethane

Formula: CH3Br (g)

CAS RN: 74-83-9

ATcT ID: 74-83-9*0

SMILES: CBr

InChI: InChI=1S/CH3Br/c1-2/h1H3

InChIKey: GZUXJHMPEANEGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: C1H3Br1

2D Image:

Aliases: CH3Br; Bromomethane; Methyl bromide; Methyl monobromide; Monobromomethane; Carbon monobromide; Monobromocarbon; RCRA U029; UN 1062; Halon 1001; R 40B1; Bercema; Brom-O-gas; Celfume; Curafume; Dawson 100; Detia gas ex-M; Dowfume; Dowfume mc-2; Dowfume mc-33; Edco; Embafume; Fumigant-1; Haltox; Iscobrome; Kayafume; MB; MBX; Mebr; Metafume; Methogas; Pestmaster; Profume; Rotox; Terabol; Terr-O-gas 100; Terr-O-gas 67; Zytox

Relative Molecular Mass: 94.9385 ± 0.0013

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
-20.89	-36.29	± 0.16	kJ/mol

3D Image of CH3Br (g)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH3Br (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 73.6% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH3Br (g).
A total of 181 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
43.8	5947.1	CH3Br (g) → [CH3]+ (g) + Br (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 12.834 ± 0.002 eV	Song 2001
9.4	1095.2	Br2 (cr,l) → Br2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 7.386 ± 0.027 kcal/mol	Hildenbrand 1958
5.2	5940.6	4 CH3Cl (g) → CCl4 (g) + 3 CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 2.52 ± 0.30 kcal/mol	Karton 2017
2.7	2279.1	2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g)	Δ_rG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/mol	Smith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
1.4	6125.7	CH4 (g) + CH2Cl2 (g) → 2 CH3Cl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 1.03 ± 0.25 kcal/mol	Karton 2017, Karton 2011, Karton 2007, Karton 2006
1.3	5966.1	2 CH3Br (l) + H2 (g) → 2 CH4 (g) + Br2 (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -6.60 ± 0.60 kcal/mol	Adams 1966, as quoted by Cox 1970
1.0	1186.1	Cl2 (g) + 2 Br- (aq) → Br2 (cr,l) + 2 Cl- (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -91.29 ± 0.40 (×2.538) kJ/mol	Johnson 1963, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals
1.0	1186.2	Cl2 (g) + 2 Br- (aq) → Br2 (cr,l) + 2 Cl- (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -91.29 ± 0.80 (×1.269) kJ/mol	Sunner 1964, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals
0.9	5931.1	CH3Cl (g) + 3/2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + H2O (cr,l) + HCl (aq, 600 H2O)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -764.00 ± 0.50 (×1.957) kJ/mol	Fletcher 1971
0.7	1196.1	[HBr]+ (g) → H (g) + Br+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 31394.5 ± 20 (×1.795) cm-1	Haugh 1971, Norling 1935
0.7	6128.6	CH4 (g) + CCl4 (g) → CH3Cl (g) + CHCl3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -3.24 ± 0.25 kcal/mol	Karton 2017, Karton 2011, Karton 2007, Karton 2006
0.6	5949.3	CH3Br (g) + HBr (g) → Br2 (g) + CH4 (g)	Δ_rG°(712.2 K) = 35.8 ± 1.6 (×1.269) kJ/mol	Ferguson 1973, 3rd Law
0.6	8938.1	S(O)(OH)2 (aq, 2500 H2O) + Br2 (cr,l) + H2O (cr,l) → OS(O)(OH)2 (aq, 2500 H2O) + 2 HBr (aq, 1250 H2O)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -55.47 ± 0.11 (×2.768) kcal/mol	Johnson 1963
0.6	5962.12	4 CH3Br (g) → CBr4 (g) + 3 CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 6.20 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	xyx 2016
0.5	5934.10	CH3Cl (g) + H (g) → CH4 (g) + Cl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -7296 ± 100 cm-1	Czako 2012
0.5	5981.4	4 CH3I (g) + CBr4 (g) → 4 CH3Br (g) + CI4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.04 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	xyx 2016
0.4	6126.7	CH4 (g) + CHCl3 (g) → CH2Cl2 (g) + CH3Cl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.13 ± 0.25 kcal/mol	Karton 2017, Karton 2011, Karton 2007, Karton 2006
0.4	2277.7	CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -890.578 ± 0.078 kJ/mol	Schley 2010
0.4	5950.1	CH3Br (g) + H2 (g) → CH4 (g) + HBr (g)	Δ_rH°(523.15 K) = -18.062 ± 0.321 kcal/mol	Fowell 1965
0.4	121.2	1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/mol	Rossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of CH3Br (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
95.9	Bromomethane cation	[CH3Br]+ (g)	996.22	981.31	± 0.17	kJ/mol	94.9380 ± 0.0013	12538-70-4*0
92.9	Bromomethane	CH3Br (l)	-56.61	-59.63	± 0.17	kJ/mol	94.9385 ± 0.0013	74-83-9*590
65.3	Chloromethane	CH3Cl (g)	-74.75	-82.68	± 0.16	kJ/mol	50.4872 ± 0.0012	74-87-3*0
64.5	Chloromethane cation	[CH3Cl]+ (g)	1014.53	1007.76	± 0.16	kJ/mol	50.4867 ± 0.0012	12538-71-5*0
63.8	Chloromethane	CH3Cl (l)	-106.55	-102.58	± 0.16	kJ/mol	50.4872 ± 0.0012	74-87-3*590
43.0	Hydrogen bromide	HBr (g)	-27.85	-35.69	± 0.13	kJ/mol	80.9119 ± 0.0010	10035-10-6*0
42.9	Bromoniumyl	[HBr]+ (g)	1097.83	1089.98	± 0.13	kJ/mol	80.9114 ± 0.0010	12258-64-9*0
40.1	Hydrogen bromide	HBr (aq, 2570 H2O)		-120.58	± 0.14	kJ/mol	80.9119 ± 0.0010	10035-10-6*952
40.1	Hydrogen bromide	HBr (aq, 3000 H2O)		-120.60	± 0.14	kJ/mol	80.9119 ± 0.0010	10035-10-6*842
40.1	Hydrogen bromide	HBr (aq, 600 H2O)		-120.35	± 0.14	kJ/mol	80.9119 ± 0.0010	10035-10-6*834

Most Influential reactions involving CH3Br (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.973	5965.2	CH3Br (l) → CH3Br (g)	Δ_rH°(276.71 K) = 5.769 ± 0.015 kcal/mol	Egan 1938
0.961	5951.3	CH3Br (g) + HCl (g) → CH3Cl (g) + HBr (g)	Δ_rG°(449.3 K) = 10.036 ± 0.019 kJ/mol	Bak 1948, 3rd Law
0.916	5945.1	CH3Br (g) → [CH3Br]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 85024.6 ± 4 cm-1	Urban 2002
0.552	5947.1	CH3Br (g) → [CH3]+ (g) + Br (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 12.834 ± 0.002 eV	Song 2001
0.280	6328.2	HCCH (g) + 2 CH3Br (g) → BrCCBr (g) + 2 CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 2.34 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.231	6328.1	HCCH (g) + 2 CH3Br (g) → BrCCBr (g) + 2 CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 3.37 ± 1.1 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.231	5981.4	4 CH3I (g) + CBr4 (g) → 4 CH3Br (g) + CI4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.04 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	xyx 2016
0.172	2843.2	ICN (g) + CH3Br (g) → BrCN (g) + CH3I (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 2.43 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic unpub
0.143	6352.4	HCCBr (g) + CH3Br (g) → BrCCBr (g) + CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.95 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.143	6351.4	HCCH (g) + CH3Br (g) → HCCBr (g) + CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 1.39 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.142	2843.3	ICN (g) + CH3Br (g) → BrCN (g) + CH3I (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 2.43 ± 1.1 kcal/mol	Ruscic unpub
0.120	2843.1	ICN (g) + CH3Br (g) → BrCN (g) + CH3I (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 2.40 ± 1.2 kcal/mol	Ruscic unpub
0.118	6352.3	HCCBr (g) + CH3Br (g) → BrCCBr (g) + CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 1.36 ± 1.1 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.118	6351.3	HCCH (g) + CH3Br (g) → HCCBr (g) + CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 2.01 ± 1.1 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.098	2822.4	BrCN (g) + CH4 (g) → HCN (g) + CH3Br (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.87 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.095	6135.4	CH3Br (g) + CBr4 (g) → CH2Br2 (g) + CHBr3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -2.81 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.081	2822.3	BrCN (g) + CH4 (g) → HCN (g) + CH3Br (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -2.27 ± 1.1 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.078	6135.3	CH3Br (g) + CBr4 (g) → CH2Br2 (g) + CHBr3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -2.99 ± 1.1 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.064	6472.4	BrCH2CH2OH (g) + CH3F (g) → FCH2CH2OH (g) + CH3Br (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.72 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.064	5962.12	4 CH3Br (g) → CBr4 (g) + 3 CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 6.20 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	xyx 2016

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2023; available at ATcT.anl.gov [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1997229]
4		N. Genossar, P. B. Changala, B. Gans, J.-C. Loison, S. Hartweg, M.-A. Martin-Drumel, G. A. Garcia, J. F. Stanton, B. Ruscic, and J. H. Baraban Ring-Opening Dynamics of the Cyclopropyl Radical and Cation: the Transition State Nature of the Cyclopropyl Cation J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18518-18525 (2022) [DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c07740]
5		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects. Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021) [DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
6		J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton, Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021) [DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
7		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
8		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.