Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122b of the Thermochemical Network [3] This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122 [4][5] to include the best possible isomerization of HCN and HNC [6].
|
Species Name |
Formula |
Image |
ΔfH°(0 K) |
ΔfH°(298.15 K) |
Uncertainty |
Units |
Relative Molecular Mass |
ATcT ID |
Iodobenzene | C6H5I (cr,l) | | 112.7 | 112.8 | ± 1.1 | kJ/mol | 204.0084 ± 0.0048 | 591-50-4*500 |
|
Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of C6H5I (cr,l)The 20 contributors listed below account only for 71.4% of the provenance of ΔfH° of C6H5I (cr,l). A total of 50 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.
Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.
|
Contribution (%) | TN ID | Reaction | Measured Quantity | Reference | 11.4 | 4023.2 | C6H5I (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + I (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 11.178 ± 0.011 eV | Stevens 2009 | 10.9 | 4027.2 | C6H5I (cr,l) → C6H5I (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 48.93 ± 0.49 kJ/mol | Basarova 1991, Boublik 1984, est unc | 10.5 | 4031.1 | C6H5I (cr,l) + HCl (g) → C6H6 (cr,l) + 1/2 I2 (cr,l) + 1/2 Cl2 (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 7.13 ± 0.75 kcal/mol | Chernick 1956, Hartley 1951 | 4.6 | 4028.1 | 2 C6H5I (cr,l) + 29/2 O2 (g) → 12 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l) + I2 (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -1526.32 ± 2.0 (×1.164) kcal/mol | Smith 1956 | 4.0 | 4029.1 | C6H5I (cr,l) + 1/2 Br2 (cr,l) → C6H5Br (cr,l) + 1/2 I2 (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -12.85 ± 0.55 kcal/mol | Chernick 1956, Hartley 1951 | 3.2 | 4026.2 | C6H5I (g) → C6H5 (g) + I (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 66.7 ± 1.0 kcal/mol | Kumaran 1997, est unc | 3.2 | 4026.3 | C6H5I (g) → C6H5 (g) + I (g)  | ΔrG°(1250 K) = 27.3 ± 1.0 kcal/mol | Kumaran 1997, 3rd Law, est unc | 3.0 | 4021.1 | C6H5Cl (g) + I (g) → C6H5I (g) + Cl (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.255 ± 0.048 eV | Stevens 2009 | 2.8 | 4018.1 | C6H5Br (cr,l) + HCl (g) → C6H6 (cr,l) + 1/2 Br2 (cr,l) + 1/2 Cl2 (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 19.98 ± 0.78 kcal/mol | Chernick 1956, Hartley 1951 | 2.2 | 4026.1 | C6H5I (g) → C6H5 (g) + I (g)  | ΔrH°(1100 K) = 281.9 ± 5 kJ/mol | Robaugh 1986, 2nd Law | 2.2 | 4026.5 | C6H5I (g) → C6H5 (g) + I (g)  | ΔrG°(1350 K) = 102.2 ± 5 kJ/mol | Heckmann 1996, 3rd Law, est unc | 1.9 | 4023.1 | C6H5I (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + I (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 11.173 ± 0.027 eV | Stevens 2009 | 1.7 | 4021.2 | C6H5Cl (g) + I (g) → C6H5I (g) + Cl (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.296 ± 0.063 eV | Stevens 2009 | 1.6 | 3927.9 | [C6H5]+ (g) → 6 C (g) + 5 H (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 4198.8 ± 4 kJ/mol | Lau 2006 | 1.3 | 3925.14 | C6H5 (g) → [C6H5]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 8.261 ± 0.035 eV | Lau 2006 | 1.3 | 3992.1 | C6H5Cl (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + Cl (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 12.428 ± 0.040 eV | Stevens 2009 | 1.2 | 3926.1 | [C6H5]- (g) → C6H5 (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.096 ± 0.006 eV | Gunion 1992 | 1.1 | 4041.1 | C6H5NO (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + NO (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.607 ± 0.020 eV | Stevens 2010a | 1.1 | 4026.6 | C6H5I (g) → C6H5 (g) + I (g)  | ΔrH°(1350 K) = 279.2 ± 7 kJ/mol | Heckmann 1996, 2nd Law, est unc | 1.1 | 3992.5 | C6H5Cl (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + Cl (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 286.7 ± 1 kcal/mol | Pratt 1981 |
|
Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of C6H5I (cr,l) |
Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances. The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.
|
Correlation Coefficent (%) | Species Name | Formula | Image | ΔfH°(0 K) | ΔfH°(298.15 K) | Uncertainty | Units | Relative Molecular Mass | ATcT ID | 89.8 | Iodobenzene | C6H5I (g) | | 177.6 | 161.6 | ± 1.0 | kJ/mol | 204.0084 ± 0.0048 | 591-50-4*0 | 89.6 | Iodobenzene cation | [C6H5I]+ (g) | | 1022.6 | 1007.1 | ± 1.0 | kJ/mol | 204.0078 ± 0.0048 | 38406-85-8*0 | 60.3 | Phenylium | [C6H5]+ (g) | | 1148.47 | 1136.57 | ± 0.89 | kJ/mol | 77.1034 ± 0.0048 | 17333-73-2*0 | 60.3 | Phenylium | [C6H5]+ (g, singlet) | | 1148.47 | 1136.57 | ± 0.89 | kJ/mol | 77.1034 ± 0.0048 | 17333-73-2*2 | 48.3 | Bromobenzene | C6H5Br (g) | | 126.5 | 104.5 | ± 1.3 | kJ/mol | 157.0079 ± 0.0049 | 108-86-1*0 | 48.2 | Bromobenzene cation | [C6H5Br]+ (g) | | 994.7 | 973.3 | ± 1.3 | kJ/mol | 157.0074 ± 0.0049 | 55450-33-4*0 | 48.2 | Bromobenzene | C6H5Br (cr,l) | | | 59.8 | ± 1.3 | kJ/mol | 157.0079 ± 0.0049 | 108-86-1*500 | 24.1 | Phenyl | C6H5 (g) | | 350.37 | 337.08 | ± 0.57 | kJ/mol | 77.1039 ± 0.0048 | 2396-01-2*0 | 22.3 | Nitrosobenzene | C6H5NO (g) | | 215.4 | 198.4 | ± 1.5 | kJ/mol | 107.1100 ± 0.0048 | 586-96-9*0 | 16.9 | Phenide | [C6H5]- (g) | | 244.70 | 231.79 | ± 0.43 | kJ/mol | 77.1044 ± 0.0048 | 30922-78-2*0 |
|
Most Influential reactions involving C6H5I (cr,l)Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.
|
Influence Coefficient | TN ID | Reaction | Measured Quantity | Reference | 0.904 | 4027.2 | C6H5I (cr,l) → C6H5I (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 48.93 ± 0.49 kJ/mol | Basarova 1991, Boublik 1984, est unc | 0.259 | 4029.1 | C6H5I (cr,l) + 1/2 Br2 (cr,l) → C6H5Br (cr,l) + 1/2 I2 (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -12.85 ± 0.55 kcal/mol | Chernick 1956, Hartley 1951 | 0.111 | 4031.1 | C6H5I (cr,l) + HCl (g) → C6H6 (cr,l) + 1/2 I2 (cr,l) + 1/2 Cl2 (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 7.13 ± 0.75 kcal/mol | Chernick 1956, Hartley 1951 | 0.046 | 4028.1 | 2 C6H5I (cr,l) + 29/2 O2 (g) → 12 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l) + I2 (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -1526.32 ± 2.0 (×1.164) kcal/mol | Smith 1956 | 0.017 | 4027.3 | C6H5I (cr,l) → C6H5I (g)  | ΔrH°(278.40 K) = 46.51 ± 1.29 (×2.709) kJ/mol | Drucker 1915, 2nd Law | 0.012 | 4027.1 | C6H5I (cr,l) → C6H5I (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 11.40 ± 1.00 kcal/mol | Cox 1970 | 0.011 | 4027.5 | C6H5I (cr,l) → C6H5I (g)  | ΔrH°(328.60 K) = 47.23 ± 4.42 kJ/mol | Young 1889, 2nd Law | 0.004 | 4030.1 | C6H5I (cr,l) + HI (g) → C6H6 (cr,l) + I2 (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -18.9 ± 3.8 kcal/mol | Graham 1955, Nichol 1952, Semb 1935, note unc2 |
|
|
References
|
1
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004)
[DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
|
2
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005)
[DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
|
3
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122b of the Thermochemical Network (2016); available at ATcT.anl.gov |
4
|
|
B. Ruscic,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Sequential Bond Dissociation Enthalpies of Methane, Ethane, and Methanol and the Related Thermochemistry.
J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 7810-7837 (2015)
[DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b01346]
|
5
|
|
S. J. Klippenstein, L. B. Harding, and B. Ruscic,
Ab initio Computations and Active Thermochemical Tables Hand in Hand: Heats of Formation of Core Combustion Species.
J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 6580-6602 (2017)
[DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b05945]
|
6
|
|
T. L. Nguyen, J. H. Baraban, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton,
On the HCN – HNC Energy Difference.
J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 10929-10934 (2015)
[DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b08406]
|
7
|
|
B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014)
[DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
|
|
|
Formula
|
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
|
|
Uncertainties
|
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [7]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
|
|
Website Functionality Credits
|
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
|
|
Acknowledgement
|
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.
|