Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.156 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.148 to include species relevant to a recent study of the oxidation of ethylene [4] as well as new measurements that led to refining the thermochemistry of CF and SiF and their cations [5].

trans-2-Butene

Formula: CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans)

CAS RN: 624-64-6

ATcT ID: 624-64-6*0

SMILES: C/C=C/C

InChI: InChI=1S/C4H8/c1-3-4-2/h3-4H,1-2H3/b4-3+

InChIKey: IAQRGUVFOMOMEM-ONEGZZNKSA-N

Hills Formula: C4H8

2D Image:

Aliases: trans-2-Butene; (2E)-2-Butene; (E)-2-Butene; beta-trans-Butene; beta-trans-Butylene; 2-trans-Butene; 2-trans-Butylene; trans-1,2-Dimethylethylene; trans-2-Butylene; trans-Butene; trans-Butene-2; t-2-C4H8; CH3CHCHCH3; CH3CH=CHCH3

Relative Molecular Mass: 56.1063 ± 0.0032

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
9.68	-10.88	± 0.28	kJ/mol

3D Image of CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 64.7% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans).
A total of 226 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
42.4	3722.1	CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + H2 (g) → CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(355.15 K) = -27.643 ± 0.060 kcal/mol	Kistiakowsky 1935a
5.9	3721.1	CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + 6 O2 (g) → 4 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -646.89 ± 0.23 kcal/mol	Prosen 1951
2.9	125.2	1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/mol	Rossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
2.5	2359.1	2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g)	Δ_rG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/mol	Smith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
1.3	3720.1	4 CH4 (g) → CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + 4 H2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 275.78 ± 2.00 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
1.0	3646.1	CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) + 13/2 O2 (g) → 4 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -2877.52 ± 0.63 kJ/mol	Pittam 1972
1.0	2214.7	C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -393.464 ± 0.024 kJ/mol	Hawtin 1966, note CO2e
0.8	3723.6	CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) → CH2C(CH3)2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -5.11 ± 2.00 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.8	3724.6	CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH2CH2 (g) → 2 CH3CHCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.78 ± 2.00 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.7	3740.6	CH2CHCH2CH3 (g) → CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -11.73 ± 2.00 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.7	3725.6	CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH3CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) + CH2CH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 21.05 ± 2.00 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.7	3726.6	CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) + CH3CHCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 9.73 ± 2.00 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.6	3737.1	CH2CHCH2CH3 (g) + 6 O2 (g) → 4 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -649.32 ± 0.18 kcal/mol	Prosen 1951
0.5	3760.1	CH2CHCHCH2 (g) + 2 H2 (g) → CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(355.15 K) = -57.079 ± 0.10 kcal/mol	Kistiakowsky 1936, Prosen 1945c
0.4	2357.7	CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -890.578 ± 0.078 kJ/mol	Schley 2010
0.4	8771.6	CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) → CH3CCHCH3 (g, trans) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 447.51 ± 2.0 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.4	2214.5	C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -393.468 ± 0.038 kJ/mol	Fraser 1952, note CO2f
0.4	2214.4	C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -393.462 ± 0.038 kJ/mol	Lewis 1965, note CO2d
0.3	4008.5	CH3(CH2)7CH3 (g) + 5 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → 6 CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.01 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.3	3654.1	CH(CH3)3 (g) + 13/2 O2 (g) → 4 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -2868.98 ± 0.59 kJ/mol	Pittam 1972

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
60.2	n-Butane	CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g)	-98.23	-125.54	± 0.19	kJ/mol	58.1222 ± 0.0033	106-97-8*0
43.2	Propane	CH3CH2CH3 (g)	-82.71	-104.99	± 0.15	kJ/mol	44.0956 ± 0.0025	74-98-6*0
33.8	Carbonic acid	C(O)(OH)2 (aq, undissoc)		-698.670	± 0.028	kJ/mol	62.0248 ± 0.0012	463-79-6*1000
33.3	Propene	CH3CHCH2 (g)	34.91	20.07	± 0.18	kJ/mol	42.0797 ± 0.0024	115-07-1*0
33.2	Propylene cation	[CH3CHCH2]+ (g)	975.20	961.67	± 0.18	kJ/mol	42.0792 ± 0.0024	34504-10-4*0
31.1	Water	H2O (l, eq.press.)		-285.804	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*589
31.1	Oxonium	[H3O]+ (aq)		-285.802	± 0.022	kJ/mol	19.02267 ± 0.00037	13968-08-6*800
31.1	Water	H2O (l)		-285.802	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*590
31.1	Water	H2O (cr,l)	-286.274	-285.802	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*500
31.1	Water	H2O (cr, l, eq.press.)	-286.276	-285.804	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*499

Most Influential reactions involving CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.754	3722.1	CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + H2 (g) → CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(355.15 K) = -27.643 ± 0.060 kcal/mol	Kistiakowsky 1935a
0.149	8772.6	CH3CCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH3CHCH2 (g) → CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH3CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -2.88 ± 2.0 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.106	8771.6	CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) → CH3CCHCH3 (g, trans) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 447.51 ± 2.0 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.069	3721.1	CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + 6 O2 (g) → 4 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -646.89 ± 0.23 kcal/mol	Prosen 1951
0.060	6999.5	C6H4(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) → C6H5CH2CH3 (g) + CH2(CH2CHCHCH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 3.94 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.053	6999.4	C6H4(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) → C6H5CH2CH3 (g) + CH2(CH2CHCHCH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 4.82 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.053	6999.2	C6H4(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) → C6H5CH2CH3 (g) + CH2(CH2CHCHCH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 4.31 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.053	6999.1	C6H4(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) → C6H5CH2CH3 (g) + CH2(CH2CHCHCH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 4.63 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.047	8772.5	CH3CCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH3CHCH2 (g) → CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH3CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.73 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.045	8743.4	CH3CHCHCH2 (g, trans) + CH3CHCH2 (g) → CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH2CHCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.40 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.045	8743.2	CH3CHCHCH2 (g, trans) + CH3CHCH2 (g) → CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH2CHCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.60 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.045	8743.1	CH3CHCHCH2 (g, trans) + CH3CHCH2 (g) → CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH2CHCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.27 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.043	6999.3	C6H4(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) → C6H5CH2CH3 (g) + CH2(CH2CHCHCH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 4.60 ± 1.00 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.042	8772.1	CH3CCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH3CHCH2 (g) → CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH3CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.79 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.042	8772.4	CH3CCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH3CHCH2 (g) → CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH3CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.67 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.042	8772.2	CH3CCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH3CHCH2 (g) → CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH3CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.38 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.037	8743.3	CH3CHCHCH2 (g, trans) + CH3CHCH2 (g) → CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH2CHCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.47 ± 1.00 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.034	8772.3	CH3CCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH3CHCH2 (g) → CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) + CH3CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.72 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.031	3723.6	CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans) → CH2C(CH3)2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -5.11 ± 2.00 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.031	3740.6	CH2CHCH2CH3 (g) → CH3CHCHCH3 (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -11.73 ± 2.00 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.156 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4		N. A. Seifert, B. Ruscic, R. Sivaramakrishnan, and K. Prozument, The C2H4O Isomers in the Oxidation of Ethylene J. Mol. Spectrosc. 398, 111847/1-8 (2023) [DOI: 10.1016/j.jms.2023.111847]
5		U. Jacovella, B. Ruscic, N. L. Chen, H.-L. Le, S. Boyé-Péronne, S. Hartweg, M. Roy-Chowdhury, G. A. Garcia, J.-C. Loison, and B. Gans, Refining Thermochemical Properties of CF, SiF, and Their Cations by Combining Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Quantum Chemical Calculations, and the Active Thermochemical Tables Approach Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 30838-30847 (2023) [DOI: 10.1039/D3CP04244H]
6		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
7		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6] and Ruscic and Bross[7]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.