Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[4] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.128 [5,6] to include with the calculations provided in reference [4].

Hydrazoic acid

Formula: HNNN (g)

CAS RN: 7782-79-8

ATcT ID: 7782-79-8*0

SMILES: N=[N+]=[N-]

InChI: InChI=1S/HN3/c1-3-2/h1H

InChIKey: JUINSXZKUKVTMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: H1N3

2D Image:

Aliases: HNNN; Hydrazoic acid; Hydrogen azide; Azidic acid; Azoimide; Diazoimide; Hydronitric acid; Triazoic acid; NNNH

Relative Molecular Mass: 43.02816 ± 0.00022

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
297.88	291.58	± 0.49	kJ/mol

3D Image of HNNN (g)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of HNNN (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 80.7% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of HNNN (g).
A total of 43 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
18.2	2103.1	2 [NNN]- (aq) + [I3]- (aq) → 3 N2 (g) + 3 I- (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -158.78 ± 0.2 kcal/mol	Gray 1956
14.8	2082.11	HNNN (g) → H (g) + 3 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 318.06 ± 0.30 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
12.3	1341.1	I2 (cr,l) + I- (aq) → [I3]- (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 1.338 ± 0.256 kcal/mol	Wu 1963
6.0	1340.1	Br2 (cr,l) + 3 I- (aq) → [I3]- (aq) + 2 Br- (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -29.355 ± 0.364 kcal/mol	Wu 1963
4.5	2100.2	HNNN (g) → HNNN (aq, undissoc)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = -1.5 ± 0.1 kcal/mol	D'Orazio 1963, as quoted by NBS Tables
4.5	2100.1	HNNN (g) → HNNN (aq, undissoc)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -8.1 ± 0.1 kcal/mol	D'Orazio 1963, as quoted by NBS Tables
4.2	2082.10	HNNN (g) → H (g) + 3 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 317.83 ± 0.56 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
4.1	2089.1	HNNN (g) → 1/2 H2 (g) + 3/2 N2 (g)	Δ_rH°(285.6 K) = -70.3 ± 0.5 (×1.139) kcal/mol	Gunther 1935, apud Gurvich TPIS, as quoted by NBS Tables
3.2	2090.1	HNNN (g) → H (g) + NNN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 30970 ± 50 cm-1	Cook 1999
1.4	2101.2	HNNN (aq, undissoc) → HNNN (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 3.60 ± 0.05 kcal/mol	Gray 1956
0.9	2082.12	HNNN (g) → H (g) + 3 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 316.66 ± 1 (×1.215) kcal/mol	Gutowski 2006
0.8	1421.11	NNN (g) → N2 (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 4.00 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Dixon 2004
0.8	1416.9	NNN (g) → 3 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 228.34 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Dixon 2004
0.8	2090.2	HNNN (g) → H (g) + NNN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 30920 ± 100 cm-1	Yuan 2008
0.7	2082.9	HNNN (g) → H (g) + 3 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 317.09 ± 1.35 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
0.7	1342.1	Cl2 (g) + 3 I- (aq) → 2 Cl- (aq) + [I3]- (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -51.5 ± 1.1 kcal/mol	Wartenberg 1930, Wartenberg 1931, Parker 1965
0.5	2082.8	HNNN (g) → H (g) + 3 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 317.66 ± 1.50 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.5	1422.4	NNN (g) + CO (g) + [O2]+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + N2 (g) + NO (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -113.80 ± 1.2 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.5	1420.9	[NNN]- (g) → 3 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 290.18 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Dixon 2004
0.5	2086.8	[HNNN]+ (g) → H (g) + 3 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 69.72 ± 1.50 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of HNNN (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
82.9	Hydrazoic acid	HNNN (aq, undissoc)		257.60	± 0.48	kJ/mol	43.02816 ± 0.00022	7782-79-8*1000
78.5	Hydrazoic acid	HNNN (aq)		272.58	± 0.48	kJ/mol	43.02816 ± 0.00022	7782-79-8*800
78.5	Azide	[NNN]- (aq)		272.58	± 0.48	kJ/mol	42.02077 ± 0.00021	14343-69-2*800
75.8	Hydrazoic acid	HNNN (cr,l)		261.46	± 0.65	kJ/mol	43.02816 ± 0.00022	7782-79-8*500
64.2	Azido radical	NNN (g)	452.24	449.66	± 0.60	kJ/mol	42.02022 ± 0.00021	12596-60-0*0
56.3	Hydrazoic acid cation	[HNNN]+ (g)	1333.63	1327.96	± 0.83	kJ/mol	43.02761 ± 0.00022	58852-14-5*0
36.1	Trinitrogen cation	[NNN]+ (g)	1519.41	1516.78	± 0.89	kJ/mol	42.01967 ± 0.00021	12185-03-4*0
34.7	Azide	[NNN]- (g)	193.52	190.02	± 0.91	kJ/mol	42.02077 ± 0.00021	14343-69-2*0
24.7	Cyanic azide	NCNNN (g)	502.6	498.2	± 1.9	kJ/mol	68.03766 ± 0.00085	764-05-6*0
-46.7	Triiodide	[I3]- (aq)		-51.32	± 0.80	kJ/mol	380.713959 ± 0.000090	14900-04-0*800

Most Influential reactions involving HNNN (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
1.000	2099.1	HNNN (cr,l) → HNNN (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 7.2 ± 0.1 kcal/mol	Gunther 1935, as quoted by NBS Tables
0.605	2090.1	HNNN (g) → H (g) + NNN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 30970 ± 50 cm-1	Cook 1999
0.499	2083.2	HNNN (g) → [HNNN]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.740 ± 0.010 eV	Eland 1970, note unc2
0.453	2100.2	HNNN (g) → HNNN (aq, undissoc)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = -1.5 ± 0.1 kcal/mol	D'Orazio 1963, as quoted by NBS Tables
0.453	2100.1	HNNN (g) → HNNN (aq, undissoc)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -8.1 ± 0.1 kcal/mol	D'Orazio 1963, as quoted by NBS Tables
0.240	2098.5	HN(NN) (g) → HNNN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -39.59 ± 1.2 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.217	2085.5	[HNNN]- (g, cis) → HNNN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.183 ± 0.050 eV	Ruscic W1RO
0.217	2084.5	[HNNN]- (g, trans) → HNNN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.111 ± 0.050 eV	Ruscic W1RO
0.204	2098.2	HN(NN) (g) → HNNN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -39.40 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.204	2098.4	HN(NN) (g) → HNNN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -40.81 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.179	7902.6	NCNNN (g) + H2 (g) → HNNN (g) + HCN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -18.3 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Pfeifle 2017, est unc
0.176	2098.1	HN(NN) (g) → HNNN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -39.90 ± 1.4 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.151	2090.2	HNNN (g) → H (g) + NNN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 30920 ± 100 cm-1	Yuan 2008
0.151	2082.11	HNNN (g) → H (g) + 3 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 318.06 ± 0.30 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
0.146	2085.2	[HNNN]- (g, cis) → HNNN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.180 ± 0.061 eV	Ruscic G4
0.146	2084.2	[HNNN]- (g, trans) → HNNN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.111 ± 0.061 eV	Ruscic G4
0.135	2098.3	HN(NN) (g) → HNNN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -38.87 ± 1.6 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.124	2083.3	HNNN (g) → [HNNN]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.72 ± 0.02 eV	Cradock 1972
0.124	2083.1	HNNN (g) → [HNNN]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.72 ± 0.02 eV	Cvitas 1976, est unc
0.124	2083.5	HNNN (g) → [HNNN]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.74 ± 0.02 eV	Bastide 1976

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2023; available at ATcT.anl.gov [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1997229]
4		N. Genossar, P. B. Changala, B. Gans, J.-C. Loison, S. Hartweg, M.-A. Martin-Drumel, G. A. Garcia, J. F. Stanton, B. Ruscic, and J. H. Baraban Ring-Opening Dynamics of the Cyclopropyl Radical and Cation: the Transition State Nature of the Cyclopropyl Cation J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18518-18525 (2022) [DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c07740]
5		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects. Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021) [DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
6		J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton, Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021) [DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
7		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
8		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.