Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122x of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122v [4] to include species relevant to the study of bond dissociation enthalpies of representative aromatic aldehydes [5].

Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass
ATcT ID
Oxygen atomO (g)[O]246.844249.229± 0.0021kJ/mol15.99940 ±
0.00030
17778-80-2*0

Representative Geometry of O (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of O (g)

The 4 contributors listed below account for 96.3% of the provenance of ΔfH° of O (g).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
47.71.4 O2 (g) → 2 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 41269.2 ± 0.5 cm-1Lewis 1985, note O2b
23.922.2 O2 (g) → O+ (g) O- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 139321.2 ± 0.7 cm-1Martin 1997, note O2c
14.71.5 O2 (g) → 2 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 41269.6 ± 0.9 cm-1Gibson 1991, note O2b
9.81.6 O2 (g) → 2 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 41268.6 ± 1.1 cm-1Cosby 1992, note O2b

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of O (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.


Correlation
Coefficent
(%)
Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass
ATcT ID
100.0 Oxygen atomO (g, triplet)[O]246.844249.229± 0.0021kJ/mol15.99940 ±
0.00030
17778-80-2*1
99.9 Oxygen atom anionO- (g)[O-]105.868108.097± 0.0021kJ/mol15.99995 ±
0.00030
14337-01-0*0
99.9 Oxygen atomO (g, singlet)[O]436.665438.523± 0.0021kJ/mol15.99940 ±
0.00030
17778-80-2*2
94.3 Oxygen atom cationO+ (g)[O+]1560.7861562.643± 0.0021kJ/mol15.99885 ±
0.00030
14581-93-2*0
16.7 Oxygen atom dication[O]+2 (g)[O++]4949.4584953.000± 0.013kJ/mol15.99830 ±
0.00030
14127-63-0*0
11.9 Oxygen atom trication[O]+3 (g)[O+3]10249.92910252.880± 0.018kJ/mol15.99775 ±
0.00030
14127-64-1*0
8.4 Oxygen atom tetracation[O]+4 (g)[O+4]17719.20717721.064± 0.025kJ/mol15.99721 ±
0.00030
14127-65-2*0
7.4 Oxidanylium[OH]+ (g)[OH+]1293.3611293.391± 0.025kJ/mol17.00679 ±
0.00031
12259-29-9*0
5.9 ChlorooxidanylClO (g)Cl=O101.124101.716± 0.035kJ/mol51.45210 ±
0.00095
14989-30-1*0
5.8 Nitrogen dioxideONO (g)O=[N]=O36.88134.074± 0.067kJ/mol46.00554 ±
0.00060
10102-44-0*0

Most Influential reactions involving O (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
1.000829.4 [ClOO]+ (g) → 2 O (g) Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -143.84 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
1.000592.5 FFO (g, singlet) → 2 F (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 41.7 ± 5 kcal/molRuscic W1RO, Ruscic CBS-n
1.00018.1 O (g) → O (g, triplet) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.000 ± 0.000 cm-1triv
0.9997568.1 OSO (g) → SO (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 45725.3 ± 0.2 cm-1Becker 1995, Becker 1993, Braatz 1998, note unc2
0.99919.1 O (g) → O (g, singlet) ΔrH°(0 K) = 15867.862 ± 0.005 cm-1NIST Atomic Web, est unc
0.99315.1 O (g) → O+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 109837.02 ± 0.06 cm-1Eriksson 1968, Moore 1970, NIST Atomic Web
0.93842.2 OOO (g) → O2 (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 102.46 ± 0.04 kJ/molTaniguchi 1999, note O3d
0.927806.1 ClO (g) → Cl (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 22182.3 ± 3 cm-1Coxon 1976, note ClO, note ClOa
0.9101746.1 ON(O)O (g) → O (g) ONO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 17079 ± 15 cm-1Johnston 1996, Davis 1993
0.8677562.1 SO (g) → S (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 43275 ± 5 cm-1Clerbaux 1994
0.7231275.7 ONO (g) → NO (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 25128.56 ± 0.03 cm-1Michalski 2004
0.625618.7 OFO (g) → F (g) + 2 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 11.2 ± 0.3 kcal/molFeller 2010
0.5313897.6 O(CHCH) (g, singlet) → 2 C (g) + 2 H (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 437.28 ± 0.30 kcal/molKarton 2011
0.497945.8 HOCl(O)O (g) → H (g) Cl (g) + 3 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 257.25 ± 0.35 kcal/molKarton 2017
0.4771.4 O2 (g) → 2 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 41269.2 ± 0.5 cm-1Lewis 1985, note O2b
0.47416.4 O- (g) → O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 11784.675 ± 0.006 cm-1Hotop 1999, Blondel 2005, Neumark 1985, Blondel 1995
0.459966.7 HOCl(O)(O)O (g) → H (g) Cl (g) + 4 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 313.86 ± 0.45 kcal/molKarton 2017
0.4513992.9 [CH3OO]+ (g) → C (g) + 3 H (g) + 2 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 840.29 ± 1. kJ/molWelch 2018
0.4221048.9 BrO (g) → Br (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 19551 ± 35 cm-1Kim 2006
0.34816.1 O- (g) → O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 11784.676 ± 0.007 cm-1Blondel 2005, Chaibi 2010


References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122x of the Thermochemical Network, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2022; available at ATcT.anl.gov
[DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1885922]
4   D. P. Zaleski, R. Sivaramakrishnan, H. R. Weller, N. A Seifert, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, K. B. Moore III, S. N. Elliott, A. V. Copan, L. B. Harding, S. J. Klippenstein, R. W. Field, and K. Prozument,
Substitution Reactions in the Pyrolysis of Acetone Revealed through a Modeling, Experiment, Theory Paradigm.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 3124-3152 (2021) [DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c11677]
5   Y. Ren, L. Zhou, A. Mellouki, V. DaĆ«le, M. Idir, S. S. Brown, B. Ruscic, Robert S. Paton, M. R. McGillen, and A. R. Ravishankara,
Reactions of NO3 with Aromatic Aldehydes: Gas-Phase Kinetics and Insights into the Mechanism of the Reaction.
Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 13537-13551 (2021) [DOI: 10.5194/acp2021-228]
6   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
7   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6,7]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.