Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122g of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122e [4] to include results centered on the determination of the appearance energy of CH3+ from CH4. [5].

Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
FormylHCO (g)[CH]=O41.39641.773± 0.098kJ/mol29.01804 ±
0.00086		2597-44-6*0

Representative Geometry of HCO (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of HCO (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 65.9% of the provenance of ΔfH° of HCO (g).
A total of 190 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)		TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
21.72531.11 [HCO]+ (g) → H+ (g) + CO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 586.51 ± 0.2 kJ/molCzako 2008
11.12463.3 CO (g) + H2 (g) → CH2O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 8.39 ± 0.28 kJ/molCzako 2009
3.22462.7 2 CH2O (g) → CH4 (g) + CO2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -59.44 ± 0.25 kcal/molKarton 2006
3.22462.8 2 CH2O (g) → CH4 (g) + CO2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -59.44 ± 0.25 kcal/molKarton 2006
3.02533.9 CO (g) + [NH4]+ (g) → [HCO]+ (g) + NH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 259.89 ± 0.3 kJ/molCzako 2008
2.42525.9 HCO (g) → H (g) + O (g) + C (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1132.68 ± 0.56 kJ/molHarding 2008
2.42444.1 [CH2OH]+ (g) → CH2O (g) + H+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 704.98 ± 0.39 kJ/molCzako 2009
2.22462.6 2 CH2O (g) → CH4 (g) + CO2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -59.52 ± 0.30 kcal/molKarton 2006
1.82465.1 CH2O (g) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(299.65 K) = -570.69 ± 0.40 (×1.719) kJ/molFletcher 1970, note std dev
1.81386.8 [NH4]+ (g) → NH3 (g) + H+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 846.40 ± 0.3 kJ/molCzako 2008
1.52525.7 HCO (g) → H (g) + O (g) + C (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1133.05 ± 0.70 kJ/molHarding 2008
1.42525.8 HCO (g) → H (g) + O (g) + C (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1132.53 ± 0.74 kJ/molHarding 2008
1.31818.5 C (graphite) + CO2 (g) → 2 CO (g) ΔrG°(1165 K) = -33.545 ± 0.058 kJ/molSmith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
1.32534.11 HCO (g) → H (g) + CO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 60.2 ± 0.8 kJ/molMarenich 2003
1.22525.6 HCO (g) → H (g) + O (g) + C (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1132.11 ± 0.75 (×1.044) kJ/molTajti 2004, est unc
1.22462.5 2 CH2O (g) → CH4 (g) + CO2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -59.52 ± 0.40 kcal/molKarton 2006
1.22462.4 2 CH2O (g) → CH4 (g) + CO2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -59.37 ± 0.40 kcal/molBoese 2004
1.12525.10 HCO (g) → H (g) + O (g) + C (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1132.87 ± 0.84 kJ/molHarding 2008
1.12525.12 HCO (g) → H (g) + O (g) + C (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1132.50 ± 0.84 kJ/molHarding 2008
0.92467.1 CH3OH (g) → CH2O (g) + H2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 20.28 ± 0.17 kcal/molNguyen 2015a

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of HCO (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation
Coefficent
(%)		Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
99.8 Oxomethylium[HCO]+ (g)[CH+]=O827.772827.188± 0.098kJ/mol29.01749 ±
0.00086		17030-74-9*0
99.8 FormaldehydeCH2O (g)C=O-105.379-109.218± 0.098kJ/mol30.02598 ±
0.00087		50-00-0*0
99.8 FormaldehydeCH2O (g, singlet)C=O-105.379-109.218± 0.098kJ/mol30.02598 ±
0.00087		50-00-0*2
99.8 FormaldehydeCH2O (g, triplet)C=O196.011192.681± 0.098kJ/mol30.02598 ±
0.00087		50-00-0*1
98.5 Formaldehyde cation[CH2O]+ (g)C=[O+]944.863941.242± 0.099kJ/mol30.02543 ±
0.00087		54288-05-0*0
23.3 HydroxymethyleneHCOH (g)[CH]O112.67108.92± 0.28kJ/mol30.02598 ±
0.00087		19710-56-6*0
23.3 HydroxymethyleneHCOH (g, trans)[CH]O112.67108.90± 0.28kJ/mol30.02598 ±
0.00087		19710-56-6*1
23.0 HydroxymethyleneHCOH (g, cis)[CH]O131.10127.35± 0.29kJ/mol30.02598 ±
0.00087		19710-56-6*2
21.7 Formyl anion[HCO]- (g)[CH-]=O11.6011.98± 0.44kJ/mol29.01859 ±
0.00086		57340-31-5*0
20.1 Ammonium[NH4]+ (g)[NH4+]643.03631.72± 0.21kJ/mol18.03795 ±
0.00029		14798-03-9*0

Most Influential reactions involving HCO (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient		 TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.9992526.1 HCO (g) → [HCO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 65735.9 ± 0.5 cm-1Mayer 1995, Foltynowicz 2001
0.9982536.1 CH2O (g) → HCO (g) + H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 30328.5 ± 0.5 cm-1Terentis 1996
0.7762527.1 [HCO]- (g) → HCO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.313 ± 0.005 eVMurray 1986
0.7162552.10 HCO (g) → COH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 175.9 ± 0.8 kJ/molMarenich 2003
0.1913643.4 HCO (g) + 2 OH (g) → HCOO (g, cis) + H2O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -1.93 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.1663643.3 HCO (g) + 2 OH (g) → HCOO (g, cis) + H2O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -2.69 ± 1.72 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.1413642.6 HCO (g) + 2 OH (g) → HCOO (g, trans) + H2O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.02 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.1233642.4 HCO (g) + 2 OH (g) → HCOO (g, trans) + H2O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 3.23 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.1073642.3 HCO (g) + 2 OH (g) → HCOO (g, trans) + H2O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.96 ± 1.72 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0543642.5 HCO (g) + 2 OH (g) → HCOO (g, trans) + H2O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.20 ± 2.16 (×1.114) kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0312525.9 HCO (g) → H (g) + O (g) + C (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1132.68 ± 0.56 kJ/molHarding 2008
0.0312527.10 [HCO]- (g) → HCO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.308 ± 0.025 eVDixon 2003, est unc
0.0212612.5 HC(O)OO (g, syn) → HCO (g) + O2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 33.95 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0202525.7 HCO (g) → H (g) + O (g) + C (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1133.05 ± 0.70 kJ/molHarding 2008
0.0193642.1 HCO (g) + 2 OH (g) → HCOO (g, trans) + H2O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.79 ± 4 kcal/molMansergas 2006, est unc
0.0192612.2 HC(O)OO (g, syn) → HCO (g) + O2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 34.37 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0192612.4 HC(O)OO (g, syn) → HCO (g) + O2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 33.76 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0182525.8 HCO (g) → H (g) + O (g) + C (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1132.53 ± 0.74 kJ/molHarding 2008
0.0182552.8 HCO (g) → COH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 42.07 ± 1.2 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0162612.1 HC(O)OO (g, syn) → HCO (g) + O2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 34.07 ± 1.72 kcal/molRuscic G3X
References (for your convenience, also available in RIS and BibTex format)
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122g of the Thermochemical Network (2019); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   J. P. Porterfield, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, J. H. Thorpe, T. L. Nguyen, J. H. Baraban, J. F. Stanton, J. W. Daily, and G. B. Ellison,
Thermal Decomposition of Potential Ester Biofuels, Part I: Methyl Acetate and Methyl Butanoate.
J. Chem. Phys. A 121, 4658-4677 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b02639] (Veronica Vaida Festschrift)
5   Y.-C. Chang, B. Xiong, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and C. Y. Ng,
A Vacuum Ultraviolet laser Pulsed Field Ionization-Photoion Study of Methane (CH4): Determination of the Appearance Energy of Methylium From Methane with Unprecedented Precision and the Resulting Impact on the Bond Dissociation Energies of CH4 and CH4+.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 9592-9605 (2017) [DOI: 10.1039/c6cp08200a] (part of 2017 PCCP Hot Articles collection)
6   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.