Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.202 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.176 in order to include species related to the thermochemistry of glycine[4].

Dioxosilane

Formula: SiO2 (cr,l)

CAS RN: 7631-86-9

ATcT ID: 7631-86-9*500

SMILES: O=[Si]=O

InChI: InChI=1S/O2Si/c1-3-2

InChIKey: VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: O2Si1

2D Image:

Aliases: SiO2; Dioxosilane; Silicon dioxide; Quartz; alpha-Quartz; beta-Quartz; Cristobalite; Tridymite; Aventurine; Silica; Silicon oxide; Silicon (IV) oxide; 14808-60-7; 14464-46-1; 99493-55-7; 15468-32-3; 60676-86-0

Relative Molecular Mass: 60.08430 ± 0.00067

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
-906.77	-911.75	± 0.63	kJ/mol

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of SiO2 (cr,l)

The 14 contributors listed below account for 90.0% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of SiO2 (cr,l).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
21.2	8720.1	Si (cr,l) + 2 F2 (g) → SiF4 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -385.98 ± 0.19 kcal/mol	Wise 1963, Wise 1963, Wise 1962
18.3	546.1	SiF4 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) → Si (cr,l) + O2 (g) + 4 HF (aq, 5 H2O)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 899.77 ± 1.20 kJ/mol	Paulechka 2020, Vorobev 1960, Hummel 1959, Johnson 1987, Good 1964, Good 1964, Johnson 1973
13.5	8681.1	Si (cr,l) + O2 (g) → SiO2 (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -217.58 ± 0.35 (×1.164) kcal/mol	Good 1964, Good 1964, Good 1962, King 1951
9.2	545.1	SiF4 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) → SiO2 (cr, quartz) + 4 HF (aq, 5 H2O)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -11.11 ± 0.37 kJ/mol	Paulechka 2020, Vorobev 1960, Hummel 1959, Johnson 1987, Good 1964, Good 1964, Kilday 1973, Kilday 1973, Johnson 1973
5.8	8722.1	SiO2 (vitr) + 2 F2 (g) → SiF4 (g) + O2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -170.04 ± 0.25 kcal/mol	Wise 1963, Wise 1963
5.8	8720.3	Si (cr,l) + 2 F2 (g) → SiF4 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -1615.78 ± 0.46 (×3.292) kJ/mol	Johnson 1986, Johnson 1986
3.3	544.2	H2O (cr,l) + F2 (g) → 2 HF (aq, 5 H2O) + 1/2 O2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -356.66 ± 0.40 kJ/mol	Paulechka 2020, Johnson 1987, Vorobev 1960, Hummel 1959, Johnson 1973
3.0	8721.1	SiO2 (cr,l) + 2 F2 (g) → SiF4 (g) + O2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -168.26 ± 0.28 (×1.269) kcal/mol	Wise 1963, Wise 1963
2.1	8663.2	Si (cr,l) → Si (g)	Δ_rG°(1525 K) = 231.1 ± 2.0 kJ/mol	Batdorf 1959, 3rd Law
1.9	545.2	SiF4 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) → SiO2 (cr, quartz) + 4 HF (aq, 5 H2O)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -11.95 ± 0.25 (×3.221) kJ/mol	Paulechka 2020, Vorobev 1960, Hummel 1959, Johnson 1987, Good 1964, Good 1964, Johnson 1982, Johnson 1973
1.8	8813.1	SiH3SiH3 (g) → 2 Si (cr,l) + 3 H2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -19.1 ± 0.6 (×1.61) kcal/mol	Gunn 1961, est unc
1.7	8777.1	SiH4 (g) → Si (cr,l) + 2 H2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -8.3 ± 0.5 kcal/mol	Gunn 1961, Gurvich TPIS, est unc
0.9	486.1	1/2 H2 (g) + 1/2 F2 (g) → HF (l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -303.56 ± 0.27 (×1.354) kJ/mol	Settle 1994, Johnson 1973, note HF
0.8	8663.3	Si (cr,l) → Si (g)	Δ_rH°(1932 K) = 393.1 ± 2.5 (×1.297) kJ/mol	Drowart 1960, 2nd Law, Gurvich TPIS

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of SiO2 (cr,l)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
100.0	Dioxosilane	SiO2 (cr, quartz)	-906.77	-911.75	± 0.63	kJ/mol	60.08430 ± 0.00067	7631-86-9*505
97.0	Dioxosilane	SiO2 (vitr)	-826.32	-902.25	± 0.64	kJ/mol	60.08430 ± 0.00067	7631-86-9*520
92.1	Dioxosilane	SiO2 (cr, cristobalite)	-904.07	-908.93	± 0.68	kJ/mol	60.08430 ± 0.00067	7631-86-9*510
71.3	Tetrafluorosilane	SiF4 (g)	-1608.76	-1614.27	± 0.52	kJ/mol	104.07911 ± 0.00030	7783-61-1*0
58.1	Oxosilylene	SiO (g)	-98.37	-97.21	± 0.54	kJ/mol	44.08490 ± 0.00042	10097-28-6*0
52.6	Silicon atom dication	[Si]+2 (g)	2814.00	2816.98	± 0.56	kJ/mol	28.08440 ± 0.00030	14175-55-4*0
52.6	Silicon cation	Si+ (g)	1236.86	1240.99	± 0.56	kJ/mol	28.08495 ± 0.00030	14067-07-3*0
52.6	Silicon anion	Si- (g)	316.28	319.26	± 0.56	kJ/mol	28.08605 ± 0.00030	14337-02-1*0
52.6	Silicon	Si (g)	450.34	454.68	± 0.56	kJ/mol	28.08550 ± 0.00030	7440-21-3*0
52.6	Silicon atom trication	[Si]+3 (g)	6045.58	6048.56	± 0.56	kJ/mol	28.08385 ± 0.00030	14175-56-5*0

Most Influential reactions involving SiO2 (cr,l)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
1.000	8682.1	SiO2 (cr, quartz) → SiO2 (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0 ± 0 cm-1	Gurvich TPIS
0.511	8698.6	SiO2 (cr,l) + Si (cr,l) → 2 SiO (g)	Δ_rG°(1618 K) = 37.94 ± 0.29 kcal/mol	Ramstad 1961, 3rd Law, Gurvich TPIS
0.171	8698.8	SiO2 (cr,l) + Si (cr,l) → 2 SiO (g)	Δ_rG°(1403 K) = 54.5 ± 0.5 kcal/mol	Emons 1972, 3rd Law
0.135	8681.1	Si (cr,l) + O2 (g) → SiO2 (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -217.58 ± 0.35 (×1.164) kcal/mol	Good 1964, Good 1964, Good 1962, King 1951
0.089	8721.1	SiO2 (cr,l) + 2 F2 (g) → SiF4 (g) + O2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -168.26 ± 0.28 (×1.269) kcal/mol	Wise 1963, Wise 1963
0.019	8698.7	SiO2 (cr,l) + Si (cr,l) → 2 SiO (g)	Δ_rH°(1618 K) = 162.93 ± 1.5 kcal/mol	Ramstad 1961, 2nd Law
0.015	8700.3	SiO2 (cr,l) + H2 (g) → SiO (g) + H2O (g)	Δ_rH°(1836 K) = 127.10 ± 0.60 (×1.719) kcal/mol	Ramstad 1961, 2nd Law
0.012	8698.9	SiO2 (cr,l) + Si (cr,l) → 2 SiO (g)	Δ_rG°(1435 K) = 210.22 ± 2.0 (×3.83) kJ/mol	Kubaschewski 1974, 3rd Law
0.008	8698.1	SiO2 (cr,l) + Si (cr,l) → 2 SiO (g)	Δ_rG°(1300 K) = 64.9 ± 2.0 (×1.114) kcal/mol	Geld 1948, Geld 1948a, 3rd Law, Gurvich TPIS
0.007	8698.11	SiO2 (cr,l) + Si (cr,l) → 2 SiO (g)	Δ_rG°(1797 K) = 100.5 ± 10.0 kJ/mol	Tombs 1952, 3rd Law, Gurvich TPIS
0.007	8698.10	SiO2 (cr,l) + Si (cr,l) → 2 SiO (g)	Δ_rH°(1435 K) = 683.46 ± 10 kJ/mol	Kubaschewski 1974, 2nd Law
0.004	8700.2	SiO2 (cr,l) + H2 (g) → SiO (g) + H2O (g)	Δ_rG°(1836 K) = 44.30 ± 0.43 (×4.269) kcal/mol	Ramstad 1961, 3rd Law, Gurvich TPIS
0.004	8698.5	SiO2 (cr,l) + Si (cr,l) → 2 SiO (g)	Δ_rG°(1361 K) = 61.1 ± 0.7 (×4.655) kcal/mol	Gunther 1958, 3rd Law, Gurvich TPIS
0.002	8700.1	SiO2 (cr,l) + H2 (g) → SiO (g) + H2O (g)	Δ_rG°(1623 K) = 228.5 ± 12 kJ/mol	Grube 1949, 3rd Law, Gurvich TPIS
0.001	8688.1	SiO2 (cr,l) → SiO2 (g)	Δ_rG°(1855 K) = 258.7 ± 12.5 (×3.589) kJ/mol	Zmbov 1973, Gurvich TPIS, 3rd Law
0.001	8698.3	SiO2 (cr,l) + Si (cr,l) → 2 SiO (g)	Δ_rG°(1398 K) = 50.2 ± 0.5 (×9.514) kcal/mol	Schafer 1950, 3rd Law, Gurvich TPIS
0.001	8698.13	SiO2 (cr,l) + Si (cr,l) → 2 SiO (g)	Δ_rG°(1377 K) = 213.1 ± 12 (×2) kJ/mol	Zmbov 1973, 3rd Law, Gurvich TPIS
0.000	8696.5	SiO2 (cr,l) → SiO (g) + 1/2 O2 (g)	Δ_rG°(1956 K) = 322 ± 20 kJ/mol	Shchedrin 1977, 3rd Law, Gurvich TPIS
0.000	8696.6	SiO2 (cr,l) → SiO (g) + 1/2 O2 (g)	Δ_rG°(1682 K) = 354.7 ± 3.0 (×7.025) kJ/mol	Nesmeyanov 1960, 3rd Law, Gurvich TPIS
0.000	8696.2	SiO2 (cr,l) → SiO (g) + 1/2 O2 (g)	Δ_rG°(1878 K) = 72.5 ± 2.5 (×2.327) kcal/mol	Nagai 1973, 3rd Law

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.202 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross Accurate and Reliable Thermochemistry by Data Analysis of Complex Thermochemical Networks using Active Thermochemical Tables: The Case of Glycine Thermochemistry Faraday Discuss. (in press) (2024) [DOI: 10.1039/D4FD00110A]
5		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.