Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.176 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.172 to include species related to Criegee intermediates that are involved in several ongoing studies[4].

Diphenylacetylene

Formula: C6H5CCC6H5 (g)
CAS RN: 501-65-5
ATcT ID: 501-65-5*0
SMILES: c1ccc(cc1)C#Cc2ccccc2
InChI: InChI=1S/C14H10/c1-3-7-13(8-4-1)11-12-14-9-5-2-6-10-14/h1-10H
InChIKey: JRXXLCKWQFKACW-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Hills Formula: C14H10

2D Image:

c1ccc(cc1)C#Cc2ccccc2
Aliases: C6H5CCC6H5; Diphenylacetylene; 1,1'-(Ethyne-1,2-diyl)dibenzene; Tolane; 1,1'-(1,2-Ethynediyl)dibenzene; 1,1'-(1,2-Ethynediyl)bis[benzene]; 1,2-Diphenylacetylene; 1,2-Diphenylethyne; Diphenylethyne; NSC 5185; Tolan
Relative Molecular Mass: 178.2292 ± 0.0112

   ΔfH°(0 K)   ΔfH°(298.15 K)UncertaintyUnits
432.3407.3± 1.2kJ/mol

3D Image of C6H5CCC6H5 (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of C6H5CCC6H5 (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 89.6% of the provenance of ΔfH° of C6H5CCC6H5 (g).
A total of 22 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
33.39240.1 C6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l) + 33/2 O2 (g) → 14 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -7250.4 ± 1.0 kJ/molCoops 1953a
22.49241.1 C6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l) → C6H5CCC6H5 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 95.1 ± 1.1 kJ/molDiogo 1993a, Minas da Piedade 1988, Tkachenko 2011
3.59238.2 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) → C6H4(C2H2(CC(C4H4))) (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -47.85 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
3.59238.4 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) → C6H4(C2H2(CC(C4H4))) (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -49.07 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
3.19238.1 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) → C6H4(C2H2(CC(C4H4))) (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -47.28 ± 1.4 kcal/molRuscic G3X
2.89239.1 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) HCCH (g) → 2 C6H5CCH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.53 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G3X
2.89239.2 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) HCCH (g) → 2 C6H5CCH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.45 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G4
2.89241.2 C6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l) → C6H5CCC6H5 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 95.7 ± 3.1 kJ/molSteele 2002
2.69239.4 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) HCCH (g) → 2 C6H5CCH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.11 ± 0.90 (×1.044) kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
2.39238.3 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) → C6H4(C2H2(CC(C4H4))) (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -48.07 ± 1.6 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
2.39239.3 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) HCCH (g) → 2 C6H5CCH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.60 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
1.69241.4 C6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l) → C6H5CCC6H5 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 95.3 ± 4 kJ/molChickos 1988, est unc
1.29241.3 C6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l) → C6H5CCC6H5 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 91.0 ± 4.6 kJ/molChickos 1987, Steele 2002
1.29241.5 C6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l) → C6H5CCC6H5 (g) ΔrH°(310 K) = 21.5 ± 1.1 kcal/molChickos 1986
0.99241.6 C6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l) → C6H5CCC6H5 (g) ΔrH°(317 K) = 21.2 ± 0.3 (×4.177) kcal/molWolf 1938
0.92228.7 C (graphite) O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.464 ± 0.024 kJ/molHawtin 1966, note CO2e
0.39242.1 C6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l) + 2 H2 (g) → C6H5CH2CH2C6H5 (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -64.1 ± 2.2 kcal/molFlitcroft 1958, note unc2
0.32228.4 C (graphite) O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.462 ± 0.038 kJ/molLewis 1965, note CO2d
0.32228.5 C (graphite) O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.468 ± 0.038 kJ/molFraser 1952, note CO2f
0.37096.5 C6H5CCH (g) CH3CH3 (g) → C6H5CH3 (g) CH3CCH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.02 ± 0.85 kcal/molRuscic W1RO

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of C6H5CCC6H5 (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.


Correlation
Coefficent
(%)
Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass
ATcT ID
66.7 DiphenylacetyleneC6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l)c1ccc(cc1)C#Cc2ccccc2334.65312.70± 0.93kJ/mol178.2292 ±
0.0112
501-65-5*500
37.0 PhenylacetyleneC6H5CCH (g)c1ccc(cc1)C#C332.78317.62± 0.69kJ/mol102.1332 ±
0.0064
536-74-3*0
36.4 PhenylacetyleneC6H5CCH (cr,l)c1ccc(cc1)C#C273.84± 0.70kJ/mol102.1332 ±
0.0064
536-74-3*500
16.4 Carbon dioxideCO2 (g)C(=O)=O-393.111-393.478± 0.015kJ/mol44.00950 ±
0.00100
124-38-9*0
16.3 Carbon dioxide cation[CO2]+ (g)[C+](=O)=O936.089936.924± 0.017kJ/mol44.00895 ±
0.00100
12181-61-2*0
15.8 Carbonic acidC(O)(OH)2 (aq, undissoc)OC(=O)O-698.673± 0.028kJ/mol62.0248 ±
0.0012
463-79-6*1000
14.7 BenzonitrileC6H5CN (g)c1ccc(cc1)C#N229.99215.79± 0.92kJ/mol103.1213 ±
0.0056
100-47-0*0
14.6 PhenanthreneC6H4(C2H2(CC(C4H4))) (g)c1ccc2c(c1)ccc3c2cccc3231.97203.16± 0.75kJ/mol178.2292 ±
0.0112
85-01-8*0
13.8 Benzoic acidC6H5C(O)OH (cr,l)c1ccc(cc1)C(=O)O-367.34-384.75± 0.17kJ/mol122.1213 ±
0.0056
65-85-0*500
13.2 Succinic acid(CH2C(O)OH)2 (cr,l)OC(=O)CCC(=O)O-918.50-940.23± 0.12kJ/mol118.0880 ±
0.0034
110-15-6*500

Most Influential reactions involving C6H5CCC6H5 (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.6199241.1 C6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l) → C6H5CCC6H5 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 95.1 ± 1.1 kJ/molDiogo 1993a, Minas da Piedade 1988, Tkachenko 2011
0.1419239.2 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) HCCH (g) → 2 C6H5CCH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.45 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.1419239.1 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) HCCH (g) → 2 C6H5CCH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.53 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.1309239.4 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) HCCH (g) → 2 C6H5CCH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.11 ± 0.90 (×1.044) kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.1149239.3 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) HCCH (g) → 2 C6H5CCH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.60 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0789241.2 C6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l) → C6H5CCC6H5 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 95.7 ± 3.1 kJ/molSteele 2002
0.0549238.2 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) → C6H4(C2H2(CC(C4H4))) (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -47.85 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0549238.4 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) → C6H4(C2H2(CC(C4H4))) (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -49.07 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0479238.1 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) → C6H4(C2H2(CC(C4H4))) (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -47.28 ± 1.4 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0469241.4 C6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l) → C6H5CCC6H5 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 95.3 ± 4 kJ/molChickos 1988, est unc
0.0369238.3 C6H5CCC6H5 (g) → C6H4(C2H2(CC(C4H4))) (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -48.07 ± 1.6 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0359241.3 C6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l) → C6H5CCC6H5 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 91.0 ± 4.6 kJ/molChickos 1987, Steele 2002
0.0359241.5 C6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l) → C6H5CCC6H5 (g) ΔrH°(310 K) = 21.5 ± 1.1 kcal/molChickos 1986
0.0279241.6 C6H5CCC6H5 (cr,l) → C6H5CCC6H5 (g) ΔrH°(317 K) = 21.2 ± 0.3 (×4.177) kcal/molWolf 1938


References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.176 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   T. L. Nguyen et al, ongoing studies (2024)
5   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.