Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.176 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.172 to include species related to Criegee intermediates that are involved in several ongoing studies[4].

Methylcyclopentane

Formula: CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)

CAS RN: 96-37-7

ATcT ID: 96-37-7*0

SMILES: CC1CCCC1

InChI: InChI=1S/C6H12/c1-6-4-2-3-5-6/h6H,2-5H2,1H3

InChIKey: GDOPTJXRTPNYNR-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: C6H12

2D Image:

Aliases: CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2); Methylcyclopentane; UN 2298; NSC 24836

Relative Molecular Mass: 84.1595 ± 0.0049

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
-68.61	-106.13	± 0.36	kJ/mol

3D Image of CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 84.2% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g).
A total of 31 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
20.0	8475.1	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = -1.150 ± 0.090 kcal/mol	Glasebrook 1939, est unc
14.8	8473.2	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -941.32 ± 0.16 (×1.067) kcal/mol	Good 1969
13.4	8473.1	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -3937.67 ± 0.75 kJ/mol	Johnson 1946, Prosen 1946
4.6	8474.1	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 31.78 ± 0.08 kJ/mol	Majer 1985
3.8	4037.1	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -936.87 ± 0.13 kcal/mol	Good 1969
3.2	125.2	1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/mol	Rossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
2.8	8475.3	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -4.47 ± 0.24 kcal/mol	Good 1969
2.6	8473.3	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -940.75 ± 0.31 (×1.297) kcal/mol	Moore 1940, Moore 1939, Cox 1970
2.6	8475.2	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -4.26 ± 0.25 kcal/mol	Johnson 1946, Prosen 1946
2.3	4037.2	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -3919.86 ± 0.70 kJ/mol	Johnson 1946, Prosen 1946
2.2	4037.3	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -936.77 ± 0.17 kcal/mol	Kaarsemaker 1952, as quoted by Cox 1970
1.8	4036.1	C6H6 (g) + 3 H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(355. K) = -49.84 ± 0.15 (×1.384) kcal/mol	Kistiakowsky 1936
1.7	4040.6	CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (g) + H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(355 K) = -28.60 ± 0.10 kcal/mol	Kistiakowsky 1936a
1.6	2375.1	2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g)	Δ_rG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/mol	Smith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
1.5	2228.7	C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -393.464 ± 0.024 kJ/mol	Hawtin 1966, note CO2e
1.2	2373.7	CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -890.578 ± 0.078 kJ/mol	Schley 2010
1.1	8475.4	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -3.93 ± 0.35 (×1.091) kcal/mol	Moore 1939, Moore 1940
0.8	4042.1	CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 17/2 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -3752.31 ± 0.49 kJ/mol	Steele 1996
0.7	4042.2	CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 17/2 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -896.79 ± 0.13 kcal/mol	Good 1969
0.6	4037.5	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -936.78 ± 0.31 kcal/mol	Moore 1940, Moore 1939, Cox 1970

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
97.4	Methylcyclopentane	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l)	-116.56	-137.92	± 0.35	kJ/mol	84.1595 ± 0.0049	96-37-7*500
60.4	Cyclohexane	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)	-131.81	-155.94	± 0.28	kJ/mol	84.1595 ± 0.0049	110-82-7*500
58.6	Cyclohexane	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	-83.23	-122.80	± 0.29	kJ/mol	84.1595 ± 0.0049	110-82-7*0
37.5	Carbonic acid	C(O)(OH)2 (aq, undissoc)		-698.673	± 0.028	kJ/mol	62.0248 ± 0.0012	463-79-6*1000
34.8	Cyclohexene	CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (g)	27.17	-4.30	± 0.32	kJ/mol	82.1436 ± 0.0049	110-83-8*0
34.0	Cyclohexene	CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l)	-21.98	-37.85	± 0.30	kJ/mol	82.1436 ± 0.0049	110-83-8*500
33.1	Water	H2O (cr,l)	-286.276	-285.804	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*500
33.1	Water	H2O (l)		-285.804	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*590
33.1	Oxonium	[H3O]+ (aq)		-285.804	± 0.022	kJ/mol	19.02267 ± 0.00037	13968-08-6*800
33.1	Water	H2O (l, eq.press.)		-285.806	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*589

Most Influential reactions involving CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.997	8474.1	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 31.78 ± 0.08 kJ/mol	Majer 1985
0.021	8471.5	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.30 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.018	8471.1	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.43 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.018	8471.4	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.45 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.018	8471.2	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.49 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.015	8471.3	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.40 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.003	8472.5	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -3.54 ± 1.2 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.003	8472.2	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -3.59 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.003	8472.4	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -3.49 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.002	8472.1	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -3.66 ± 1.4 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.002	8472.3	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -3.60 ± 1.6 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.176 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4		T. L. Nguyen et al, ongoing studies (2024)
5		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.