Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[4] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.128 [5,6] to include with the calculations provided in reference [4].

Iodomethane

Formula: CH3I (l)

CAS RN: 74-88-4

ATcT ID: 74-88-4*590

SMILES: CI

InChI: InChI=1S/CH3I/c1-2/h1H3

InChIKey: INQOMBQAUSQDDS-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: C1H3I1

2D Image:

Aliases: CH3I; Iodomethane; Methyl iodide; Methyl monoiodide; Monoiodomethane; Carbon monoiodide; Monoiodocarbon; RCRA U138; UN 2644; Halon 10001

Relative Molecular Mass: 141.93899 ± 0.00083

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
	-12.28	± 0.20	kJ/mol

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH3I (l)

The 12 contributors listed below account for 90.1% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH3I (l).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
39.3	5969.2	CH3I (g) → [CH3]+ (g) + I (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 12.251 ± 0.0024 eV	Lee 2007
14.3	5969.1	CH3I (g) → [CH3]+ (g) + I (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 12.248 ± 0.003 (×1.325) eV	Bodi 2009
8.3	5983.3	CH3I (l) → CH3I (g)	Δ_rG°(299.19 K) = 1.484 ± 0.125 kJ/mol	Boublik 1972, Fogg 1953, Zaalishvili 1962, Raetzsch 1965, ThermoData 2004
5.1	5983.5	CH3I (l) → CH3I (g)	Δ_rG°(287.05 K) = 2.578 ± 0.160 kJ/mol	Boublik 1972, Fogg 1953, Zaalishvili 1962, Raetzsch 1965, ThermoData 2004
4.5	5983.7	CH3I (l) → CH3I (g)	Δ_rG°(285.78 K) = 2.69 ± 0.17 kJ/mol	Thompson 1936, Fogg 1953, Zaalishvili 1962, Raetzsch 1965, ThermoData 2004
4.4	5971.4	CH3I (g) + HI (g) → I2 (g) + CH4 (g)	Δ_rG°(669 K) = -10.34 ± 0.09 (×1.834) kcal/mol	Goy 1965, 3rd Law
4.1	5971.2	CH3I (g) + HI (g) → I2 (g) + CH4 (g)	Δ_rG°(630.5 K) = -10.48 ± 0.08 (×2.134) kcal/mol	Golden 1965, 3rd Law, Cox 1970
2.9	5969.3	CH3I (g) → [CH3]+ (g) + I (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 12.243 ± 0.008 (×1.091) eV	Lee 2007, Bodi 2009
2.0	2279.1	2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g)	Δ_rG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/mol	Smith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
2.0	5982.1	2 CH3I (l) + 7/2 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (l) + I2 (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -1617.2 ± 0.6 (×4.362) kJ/mol	Carson 1993
1.6	5969.5	CH3I (g) → [CH3]+ (g) + I (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 12.24 ± 0.01 (×1.189) eV	Mintz 1976
1.1	5984.1	2 CH3I (l) + H2 (g) → 2 CH4 (g) + I2 (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -30.0 ± 0.8 kcal/mol	Carson 1961, note unc, Cox 1970

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of CH3I (l)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
89.7	Iodomethane	CH3I (g)	24.39	14.86	± 0.18	kJ/mol	141.93899 ± 0.00083	74-88-4*0
89.5	Iodomethane cation	[CH3I]+ (g)	944.68	935.29	± 0.18	kJ/mol	141.93844 ± 0.00083	12538-72-6*0
22.9	Methylium	[CH3]+ (g)	1099.347	1095.403	± 0.045	kJ/mol	15.03397 ± 0.00083	14531-53-4*0
22.3	Methane	CH4 (g)	-66.549	-74.518	± 0.044	kJ/mol	16.04246 ± 0.00085	74-82-8*0
20.4	Methyl	CH3 (g)	149.874	146.473	± 0.050	kJ/mol	15.03452 ± 0.00083	2229-07-4*0
17.3	Methane cation	[CH4]+ (g)	1150.680	1144.298	± 0.058	kJ/mol	16.04191 ± 0.00085	20741-88-2*0
12.9	Tetraiodomethane	CI4 (g)	320.9	315.8	± 2.0	kJ/mol	519.62858 ± 0.00081	507-25-5*0
10.3	Carbonic acid	C(O)(OH)2 (aq, undissoc)		-698.995	± 0.028	kJ/mol	62.0248 ± 0.0012	463-79-6*1000
10.3	Water	H2O (cr,l)	-286.272	-285.800	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*500
10.3	Water	H2O (l)		-285.800	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*590

Most Influential reactions involving CH3I (l)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.457	5983.3	CH3I (l) → CH3I (g)	Δ_rG°(299.19 K) = 1.484 ± 0.125 kJ/mol	Boublik 1972, Fogg 1953, Zaalishvili 1962, Raetzsch 1965, ThermoData 2004
0.279	5983.5	CH3I (l) → CH3I (g)	Δ_rG°(287.05 K) = 2.578 ± 0.160 kJ/mol	Boublik 1972, Fogg 1953, Zaalishvili 1962, Raetzsch 1965, ThermoData 2004
0.247	5983.7	CH3I (l) → CH3I (g)	Δ_rG°(285.78 K) = 2.69 ± 0.17 kJ/mol	Thompson 1936, Fogg 1953, Zaalishvili 1962, Raetzsch 1965, ThermoData 2004
0.021	5982.1	2 CH3I (l) + 7/2 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (l) + I2 (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -1617.2 ± 0.6 (×4.362) kJ/mol	Carson 1993
0.018	6287.2	CH3CH2I (l) + CH3 (g) → CH3I (l) + CH3CH2 (g)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = -7.5 ± 4 kJ/mol	Castelhano 1982, note unc3
0.012	5984.1	2 CH3I (l) + H2 (g) → 2 CH4 (g) + I2 (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -30.0 ± 0.8 kcal/mol	Carson 1961, note unc, Cox 1970
0.004	6286.2	CH3CH2I (l) + CH4 (g) → CH3I (l) + CH3CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 4.32 ± 1.80 kcal/mol	Castelhano 1982, note unc
0.003	5983.1	CH3I (l) → CH3I (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 28.5 ± 0.8 (×1.719) kJ/mol	NBS Tables 1989
0.001	5983.2	CH3I (l) → CH3I (g)	Δ_rH°(299.19 K) = 28.12 ± 1.94 kJ/mol	Boublik 1972, Fogg 1953, Zaalishvili 1962, Raetzsch 1965, ThermoData 2004
0.001	5984.2	2 CH3I (l) + H2 (g) → 2 CH4 (g) + I2 (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -28.04 ± 2.4 kcal/mol	Carson 1949a
0.001	5983.4	CH3I (l) → CH3I (g)	Δ_rH°(287.05 K) = 28.29 ± 2.61 kJ/mol	Boublik 1972, Fogg 1953, Zaalishvili 1962, Raetzsch 1965, ThermoData 2004
0.000	5983.6	CH3I (l) → CH3I (g)	Δ_rH°(285.78 K) = 28.09 ± 2.77 kJ/mol	Thompson 1936, Fogg 1953, Zaalishvili 1962, Raetzsch 1965, ThermoData 2004

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2023; available at ATcT.anl.gov [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1997229]
4		N. Genossar, P. B. Changala, B. Gans, J.-C. Loison, S. Hartweg, M.-A. Martin-Drumel, G. A. Garcia, J. F. Stanton, B. Ruscic, and J. H. Baraban Ring-Opening Dynamics of the Cyclopropyl Radical and Cation: the Transition State Nature of the Cyclopropyl Cation J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18518-18525 (2022) [DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c07740]
5		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects. Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021) [DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
6		J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton, Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021) [DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
7		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
8		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.