Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.124 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was generated by additional expansion of version 1.122x [4] to include additional information relevant to the study of thermophysical and thermochemical properties of CH2 and CH3 using nonrigid rotor anharmonic oscillator (NRRAO) partition functions [5], the development and benchmarking of a state-of-the-art computational approach that aims to reproduce total atomization energies of small molecules within 10–15 cm^-1 [6], as well as the study of the reversible reaction C₂H₃ + H₂ ⇌ C₂H₄ + H ⇌ C₂H₅ [7]

1-Propanol

Formula: CH3CH2CH2OH (g)

CAS RN: 71-23-8

ATcT ID: 71-23-8*0

SMILES: CCCO

InChI: InChI=1S/C3H8O/c1-2-3-4/h4H,2-3H2,1H3

InChIKey: BDERNNFJNOPAEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: C3H8O1

2D Image:

Aliases: CH3CH2CH2OH; 1-Propanol; 1-Hydroxypropane; 1-Propyl alcohol; Ethylcarbinol; n-Propanol; n-Propyl alcohol; n-Propan-1-ol; Propan-1-ol; n-PrOH; UN 1274; Optal; Osmosol extra; Propanol; CH3(CH2)2OH

Relative Molecular Mass: 60.0950 ± 0.0025

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
-231.26	-255.10	± 0.24	kJ/mol

3D Image of CH3CH2CH2OH (g)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH3CH2CH2OH (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 78.4% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH3CH2CH2OH (g).
A total of 84 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
46.5	4523.2	CH3CH2CH2OH (cr,l) + 9/2 O2 (g) → 3 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -2021.17 ± 0.25 kJ/mol	Dekker 1970, mw conversion
7.0	4523.3	CH3CH2CH2OH (cr,l) + 9/2 O2 (g) → 3 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -2020.41 ± 0.63 (×1.022) kJ/mol	Lewis 1967, Buckley 1967, Dekker 1970, mw conversion
5.5	120.2	1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/mol	Rossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
5.1	4523.1	CH3CH2CH2OH (cr,l) + 9/2 O2 (g) → 3 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -483.12 ± 0.18 kcal/mol	Snelson 1961
2.5	4524.1	CH3CH2CH2OH (cr,l) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 47.50 ± 0.12 kJ/mol	Majer 1985
2.3	4524.3	CH3CH2CH2OH (cr,l) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 11.32 ± 0.03 kcal/mol	Wadso 1966a
1.6	4524.2	CH3CH2CH2OH (cr,l) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 47.51 ± 0.15 kJ/mol	Polak 1971, est unc
1.0	2245.1	2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g)	Δ_rG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/mol	Smith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
0.9	4523.4	CH3CH2CH2OH (cr,l) + 9/2 O2 (g) → 3 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(303.15 K) = -2018.61 ± 0.30 (×5.907) kJ/mol	Chao 1965, mw conversion
0.8	2101.7	C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -393.464 ± 0.024 kJ/mol	Hawtin 1966, note CO2e
0.8	6584.6	CH3CH2CHO (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → CH3CHO (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 1.25 ± 2.00 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.8	6583.6	CH3CH2CHO (g) → CH3C(O)CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -29.60 ± 2.00 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.8	4515.7	CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 17.33 ± 2.00 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.4	2244.4	CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -890.61 ± 0.21 kJ/mol	Dale 2002
0.3	152.1	OH (g) → [OH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 104989 ± 5 (×2.229) cm-1	Wiedmann 1992, note unc
0.3	2101.4	C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -393.462 ± 0.038 kJ/mol	Lewis 1965, note CO2d
0.3	2101.5	C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -393.468 ± 0.038 kJ/mol	Fraser 1952, note CO2f
0.3	161.6	H2O (g) → [OH]+ (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 18.1183 ± 0.0015 eV	Bodi 2014
0.3	4684.6	HC(O)CH2OH (g, syn-syn) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CHO (g) + CH3CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.05 ± 2.00 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.2	2244.6	CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -890.44 ± 0.26 kJ/mol	GOMB Ref Calorimeter, Alexandrov 2002

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of CH3CH2CH2OH (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
99.6	Propionaldehyde	CH3CH2CHO (g)	-171.22	-186.62	± 0.24	kJ/mol	58.0791 ± 0.0025	123-38-6*0
94.9	1-Propanol	CH3CH2CH2OH (cr,l)	-290.38	-302.56	± 0.23	kJ/mol	60.0950 ± 0.0025	71-23-8*500
85.7	Propionaldehyde	CH3CH2CHO (cr,l)	-218.02	-216.57	± 0.28	kJ/mol	58.0791 ± 0.0025	123-38-6*500
39.4	Carbonic acid	C(O)(OH)2 (aq, undissoc)		-698.991	± 0.030	kJ/mol	62.0248 ± 0.0012	463-79-6*1000
38.9	Water	H2O (cr, l, eq.press.)	-286.269	-285.797	± 0.025	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*499
38.9	Water	H2O (l, eq.press.)		-285.797	± 0.025	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*589
38.9	Oxonium	[H3O]+ (aq)		-285.796	± 0.025	kJ/mol	19.02267 ± 0.00037	13968-08-6*800
38.9	Water	H2O (l)		-285.796	± 0.025	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*590
38.9	Water	H2O (cr,l)	-286.268	-285.796	± 0.025	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*500
38.9	Water	H2O (g)	-238.898	-241.801	± 0.025	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*0

Most Influential reactions involving CH3CH2CH2OH (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.998	6585.4	CH3CH2CHO (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rG°(499 K) = -11.553 ± 0.021 kJ/mol	Connett 1972, 3rd Law
0.371	4524.1	CH3CH2CH2OH (cr,l) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 47.50 ± 0.12 kJ/mol	Majer 1985
0.339	4524.3	CH3CH2CH2OH (cr,l) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 11.32 ± 0.03 kcal/mol	Wadso 1966a
0.238	4524.2	CH3CH2CH2OH (cr,l) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 47.51 ± 0.15 kJ/mol	Polak 1971, est unc
0.127	6633.5	CH3CH2CH2ONO (g, gauche-trans-cis) + CH3CH2OH (g) → CH3CH2ONO (g, trans-cis) + CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.08 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.113	6633.2	CH3CH2CH2ONO (g, gauche-trans-cis) + CH3CH2OH (g) → CH3CH2ONO (g, trans-cis) + CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.13 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.113	6633.4	CH3CH2CH2ONO (g, gauche-trans-cis) + CH3CH2OH (g) → CH3CH2ONO (g, trans-cis) + CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.18 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.113	6633.1	CH3CH2CH2ONO (g, gauche-trans-cis) + CH3CH2OH (g) → CH3CH2ONO (g, trans-cis) + CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.15 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.092	6633.3	CH3CH2CH2ONO (g, gauche-trans-cis) + CH3CH2OH (g) → CH3CH2ONO (g, trans-cis) + CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.13 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.030	4524.4	CH3CH2CH2OH (cr,l) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 11.44 ± 0.10 kcal/mol	Snelson 1961, Williamson 1957
0.028	7866.5	CH3CH2CH2NH2 (g) + CH3CH2OH (g) → CH3CH2NH2 (g) + CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.14 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.025	4515.7	CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 17.33 ± 2.00 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.025	7866.1	CH3CH2CH2NH2 (g) + CH3CH2OH (g) → CH3CH2NH2 (g) + CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.05 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.025	7866.2	CH3CH2CH2NH2 (g) + CH3CH2OH (g) → CH3CH2NH2 (g) + CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.03 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.025	7866.4	CH3CH2CH2NH2 (g) + CH3CH2OH (g) → CH3CH2NH2 (g) + CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.16 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.020	7866.3	CH3CH2CH2NH2 (g) + CH3CH2OH (g) → CH3CH2NH2 (g) + CH3CH2CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.04 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.014	4518.5	CH3CH2CH2OH (g) + CH3OH (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -3.07 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.013	4518.1	CH3CH2CH2OH (g) + CH3OH (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -3.04 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.013	4518.2	CH3CH2CH2OH (g) + CH3OH (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -2.94 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.013	4518.4	CH3CH2CH2OH (g) + CH3OH (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -2.99 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.124 of the Thermochemical Network, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2022; available at ATcT.anl.gov [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1885923]
4		Y. Ren, L. Zhou, A. Mellouki, V. Daële, M. Idir, S. S. Brown, B. Ruscic, Robert S. Paton, M. R. McGillen, and A. R. Ravishankara, Reactions of NO3 with Aromatic Aldehydes: Gas-Phase Kinetics and Insights into the Mechanism of the Reaction. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 13537-13551 (2021) [DOI: 10.5194/acp2021-228]
5		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects. Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021) [DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
6		J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton, Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021) [DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
7		T. L. Nguyen, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, G. B. Ellison, and J. F. Stanton, Mechanism, Thermochemistry, and Kinetics of the Reversible Reactions: C2H3 + H2 ⇌ C2H4 + H ⇌ C2H5. Faraday Discuss. , (Advance Article) (2022) [DOI: 10.1039/D1FD00124H]
8		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
9		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [8,9]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.