Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.124 of the Thermochemical Network [3] This version of ATcT results was generated by additional expansion of version 1.122x [4] to include additional information relevant to the study of thermophysical and thermochemical properties of CH2 and CH3 using nonrigid rotor anharmonic oscillator (NRRAO) partition functions [5], the development and benchmarking of a state-of-the-art computational approach that aims to reproduce total atomization energies of small molecules within 10–15 cm-1 [6], as well as the study of the reversible reaction C2H3 + H2 ⇌ C2H4 + H ⇌ C2H5 [7]
|
Cyclohexane |
Formula: CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) |
CAS RN: 110-82-7 |
ATcT ID: 110-82-7*500 |
SMILES: C1CCCCC1 |
InChI: InChI=1S/C6H12/c1-2-4-6-5-3-1/h1-6H2 |
InChIKey: XDTMQSROBMDMFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
Hills Formula: C6H12 |
2D Image: |
|
Aliases: CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2); Cyclohexane; Hexanaphthene; Hexamethylene; Hexahydrobenzene; UN 1145 |
Relative Molecular Mass: 84.1595 ± 0.0049 |
ΔfH°(0 K) | ΔfH°(298.15 K) | Uncertainty | Units |
---|
-131.77 | -155.90 | ± 0.29 | kJ/mol |
|
Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)The 20 contributors listed below account only for 77.3% of the provenance of ΔfH° of CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l). A total of 70 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.
Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.
|
Contribution (%) | TN ID | Reaction | Measured Quantity | Reference | 12.9 | 3783.1 | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.87 ± 0.13 kcal/mol | Good 1969 | 7.8 | 3783.2 | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3919.86 ± 0.70 kJ/mol | Johnson 1946, Prosen 1946 | 7.5 | 3783.3 | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.77 ± 0.17 kcal/mol | Kaarsemaker 1952, as quoted by Cox 1970 | 7.5 | 120.2 | 1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/mol | Rossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930 | 5.9 | 3786.6 | CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (g) + H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)  | ΔrH°(355 K) = -28.60 ± 0.10 kcal/mol | Kistiakowsky 1936a | 5.5 | 3782.1 | C6H6 (g) + 3 H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)  | ΔrH°(355. K) = -49.84 ± 0.15 (×1.445) kcal/mol | Kistiakowsky 1936 | 3.3 | 7365.1 | CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3937.67 ± 0.75 kJ/mol | Johnson 1946, Prosen 1946 | 3.1 | 7365.2 | CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -941.32 ± 0.16 (×1.139) kcal/mol | Good 1969 | 2.8 | 3788.1 | CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 17/2 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3752.31 ± 0.49 kJ/mol | Steele 1996 | 2.5 | 2101.7 | C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.464 ± 0.024 kJ/mol | Hawtin 1966, note CO2e | 2.5 | 7367.1 | CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)  | ΔrG°(298.15 K) = -1.150 ± 0.090 kcal/mol | Glasebrook 1939, est unc | 2.3 | 3788.2 | CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 17/2 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -896.79 ± 0.13 kcal/mol | Good 1969 | 2.2 | 3783.5 | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.78 ± 0.31 kcal/mol | Moore 1940, Moore 1939, Cox 1970 | 2.1 | 3790.2 | CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -28.4 ± 0.2 kcal/mol | Roth 1980a, note unc | 2.1 | 3783.4 | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.52 ± 0.24 (×1.325) kcal/mol | Spitzer 1947 | 1.8 | 3788.3 | CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 17/2 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -896.61 ± 0.12 (×1.215) kcal/mol | Labbauf 1961 | 1.4 | 2245.1 | 2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g)  | ΔrG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/mol | Smith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law | 1.0 | 2101.4 | C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.462 ± 0.038 kJ/mol | Lewis 1965, note CO2d | 1.0 | 2101.5 | C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.468 ± 0.038 kJ/mol | Fraser 1952, note CO2f | 0.9 | 3789.1 | CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 33.57 ± 0.17 kJ/mol | Majer 1985 |
|
Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) |
Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances. The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.
|
Correlation Coefficent (%) | Species Name | Formula | Image | ΔfH°(0 K) | ΔfH°(298.15 K) | Uncertainty | Units | Relative Molecular Mass | ATcT ID | 96.9 | Cyclohexane | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) | | -83.20 | -122.76 | ± 0.29 | kJ/mol | 84.1595 ± 0.0049 | 110-82-7*0 | 63.6 | Methylcyclopentane | CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) | | -116.54 | -137.90 | ± 0.36 | kJ/mol | 84.1595 ± 0.0049 | 96-37-7*500 | 62.1 | Methylcyclopentane | CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) | | -68.59 | -106.12 | ± 0.37 | kJ/mol | 84.1595 ± 0.0049 | 96-37-7*0 | 55.9 | Cyclohexene | CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (g) | | 27.21 | -4.26 | ± 0.32 | kJ/mol | 82.1436 ± 0.0049 | 110-83-8*0 | 54.0 | Cyclohexene | CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) | | -21.94 | -37.81 | ± 0.30 | kJ/mol | 82.1436 ± 0.0049 | 110-83-8*500 | 50.3 | Carbonic acid | C(O)(OH)2 (aq, undissoc) | | | -698.991 | ± 0.030 | kJ/mol | 62.0248 ± 0.0012 | 463-79-6*1000 | 45.5 | Water | H2O (cr,l) | | -286.268 | -285.796 | ± 0.025 | kJ/mol | 18.01528 ± 0.00033 | 7732-18-5*500 | 45.5 | Water | H2O (l) | | | -285.796 | ± 0.025 | kJ/mol | 18.01528 ± 0.00033 | 7732-18-5*590 | 45.5 | Oxonium | [H3O]+ (aq) | | | -285.796 | ± 0.025 | kJ/mol | 19.02267 ± 0.00037 | 13968-08-6*800 | 45.5 | Water | H2O (l, eq.press.) | | | -285.797 | ± 0.025 | kJ/mol | 18.01528 ± 0.00033 | 7732-18-5*589 |
|
Most Influential reactions involving CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.
|
Influence Coefficient | TN ID | Reaction | Measured Quantity | Reference | 0.788 | 3784.1 | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 33.12 ± 0.08 kJ/mol | Majer 1985 | 0.552 | 7367.1 | CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)  | ΔrG°(298.15 K) = -1.150 ± 0.090 kcal/mol | Glasebrook 1939, est unc | 0.194 | 3783.1 | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.87 ± 0.13 kcal/mol | Good 1969 | 0.117 | 3783.2 | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3919.86 ± 0.70 kJ/mol | Johnson 1946, Prosen 1946 | 0.115 | 3784.3 | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 7.91 ± 0.05 kcal/mol | Prosen 1946 | 0.113 | 3783.3 | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.77 ± 0.17 kcal/mol | Kaarsemaker 1952, as quoted by Cox 1970 | 0.112 | 3790.2 | CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -28.4 ± 0.2 kcal/mol | Roth 1980a, note unc | 0.077 | 7367.3 | CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -4.47 ± 0.24 kcal/mol | Good 1969 | 0.074 | 3784.2 | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 7.983 ± 0.025 (×2.484) kcal/mol | Aston 1943a | 0.071 | 7367.2 | CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -4.26 ± 0.25 kcal/mol | Johnson 1946, Prosen 1946 | 0.034 | 3783.5 | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.78 ± 0.31 kcal/mol | Moore 1940, Moore 1939, Cox 1970 | 0.032 | 3783.4 | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.52 ± 0.24 (×1.325) kcal/mol | Spitzer 1947 | 0.030 | 7367.4 | CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3.93 ± 0.35 (×1.091) kcal/mol | Moore 1939, Moore 1940 | 0.018 | 3790.6 | CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -27.97 ± 0.5 kcal/mol | Molnar 1984, est unc | 0.003 | 3790.5 | CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -27.10 ± 1.0 (×1.139) kcal/mol | Turner 1957, est unc | 0.003 | 3790.3 | CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)  | ΔrH°(293 K) = -28.7 ± 1.2 kcal/mol | Lopes 1975 | 0.001 | 3790.4 | CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -26.9 ± 1.8 kcal/mol | Rogers 1971, est unc | 0.000 | 3783.6 | CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -938.6 ± 2 kcal/mol | Roth 1915c, Prosen 1946, est unc |
|
|
References
|
1
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004)
[DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
|
2
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005)
[DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
|
3
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.124 of the Thermochemical Network, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2022; available at ATcT.anl.gov [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1885923]
|
4
|
|
Y. Ren, L. Zhou, A. Mellouki, V. Daële, M. Idir, S. S. Brown, B. Ruscic, Robert S. Paton, M. R. McGillen, and A. R. Ravishankara,
Reactions of NO3 with Aromatic Aldehydes: Gas-Phase Kinetics and Insights into the Mechanism of the Reaction.
Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 13537-13551 (2021)
[DOI: 10.5194/acp2021-228]
|
5
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects.
Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021)
[DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
|
6
|
|
J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton,
Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions
J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021)
[DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
|
7
|
|
T. L. Nguyen, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, G. B. Ellison, and J. F. Stanton,
Mechanism, Thermochemistry, and Kinetics of the Reversible Reactions: C2H3 + H2 ⇌ C2H4 + H ⇌ C2H5.
Faraday Discuss. , (Advance Article) (2022)
[DOI: 10.1039/D1FD00124H]
|
8
|
|
B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014)
[DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
|
9
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019)
[DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]
|
|
|
Formula
|
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
|
|
Uncertainties
|
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [8,9]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
|
|
Website Functionality Credits
|
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
|
|
Acknowledgement
|
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.
|