Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122p of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122o [4] to include an updated enthalpy of formation for Hydrazine. [5].

Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
Benzylide[C6H5CH2]- (g)c1ccc(cc1)[CH2-]141.78122.86± 0.44kJ/mol91.1310 ±
0.0056		18860-15-6*0

Representative Geometry of [C6H5CH2]- (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of [C6H5CH2]- (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 61.1% of the provenance of ΔfH° of [C6H5CH2]- (g).
A total of 256 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)		TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
16.95048.4 C6H5CH3 (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 7 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -934.45 ± 0.12 kcal/molGood 1969
16.95048.1 C6H5CH3 (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 7 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -934.49 ± 0.12 kcal/molProsen 1945a, as quoted by Cox 1970
3.72439.9 CH3OH (g) → CH3O (g) + H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 104.06 ± 0.17 kcal/molNguyen 2015a
2.75060.2 [C6H5CH2]- (g) + CH3OH (g) → C6H5CH3 (g) + [CH3O]- (g) ΔrG°(300 K) = 0.16 ± 0.02 kcal/molEllison 1996
2.72436.1 [CH3O]- (g) → CH3O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 12655 ± 15 cm-1Nee 2006
2.65048.2 C6H5CH3 (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 7 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -934.72 ± 0.11 (×2.768) kcal/molCoops 1946, as quoted by Cox 1970
2.42444.1 CH3OH (g) + F- (g) → [CH3O]- (g) + HF (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.462 ± 0.003 (×3.668) eVDeTuri 1999, Ervin 2002
2.32467.10 CH2OH (g) → CH3O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 9.47 ± 0.17 kcal/molNguyen 2015a
1.9118.2 1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/molRossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
1.61764.7 C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.464 ± 0.024 kJ/molHawtin 1966, note CO2e
1.35052.1 [C6H5CH2]- (g) → C6H5CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.912 ± 0.006 eVGunion 1992
1.02446.1 CH3O (g) → CH3 (g) + O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 87.8 ± 0.3 kcal/molOsborn 1995, Osborn 1997
0.65047.1 C6H5CH3 (l) → C6H5CH3 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 38.06 ± 0.08 kJ/molMajer 1985
0.61764.4 C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.462 ± 0.038 kJ/molLewis 1965, note CO2d
0.61764.5 C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.468 ± 0.038 kJ/molFraser 1952, note CO2f
0.62440.9 CH3OH (g) → [CH3O]- (g) + H+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 381.8 ± 0.50 kcal/molMatus 2007
0.52436.2 [CH3O]- (g) → CH3O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.572 ± 0.004 eVRamond 2000
0.53280.1 [CH3CH2O]- (g) + CH3OH (g) → [CH3O]- (g) + CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.129 ± 0.004 (×3.83) eVDeTuri 1999, Ervin 2002
0.52438.9 [CH3O]- (g) → C (g) + 3 H (g) + O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 413.01 ± 0.50 kcal/molMatus 2007
0.42447.1 CH3O (g) → CH2O (g) + H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 6950 ± 150 cm-1Dertinger 1995

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of [C6H5CH2]- (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation
Coefficent
(%)		Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
75.8 TolueneC6H5CH3 (g)c1ccc(cc1)C73.2950.01± 0.34kJ/mol92.1384 ±
0.0056		108-88-3*0
74.6 TolueneC6H5CH3 (l)c1ccc(cc1)C19.7211.97± 0.34kJ/mol92.1384 ±
0.0056		108-88-3*500
61.6 BenzylC6H5CH2 (g)c1ccc(cc1)[CH2]229.93211.11± 0.60kJ/mol91.1305 ±
0.0056		2154-56-5*0
61.4 Benzylium[C6H5CH2]+ (g)c1ccc(cc1)[CH2+]929.35909.85± 0.61kJ/mol91.1299 ±
0.0056		6711-19-9*0
55.1 Methoxide[CH3O]- (g)C[O-]-122.64-130.37± 0.30kJ/mol31.03447 ±
0.00088		3315-60-4*0
46.7 MethoxyCH3O (g)C[O]28.8221.45± 0.29kJ/mol31.03392 ±
0.00088		2143-68-2*0
23.1 Succinic acid(CH2C(O)OH)2 (cr,l)OC(=O)CCC(=O)O-918.55-940.28± 0.13kJ/mol118.0880 ±
0.0034		110-15-6*500
21.3 Carbon dioxideCO2 (g)C(=O)=O-393.108-393.474± 0.015kJ/mol44.00950 ±
0.00100		124-38-9*0
21.2 WaterH2O (cr,l)O-286.302-285.830± 0.026kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*500
21.2 Oxonium[H3O]+ (aq)[OH3+]-285.830± 0.026kJ/mol19.02267 ±
0.00037		13968-08-6*800

Most Influential reactions involving [C6H5CH2]- (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient		 TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.9905060.2 [C6H5CH2]- (g) + CH3OH (g) → C6H5CH3 (g) + [CH3O]- (g) ΔrG°(300 K) = 0.16 ± 0.02 kcal/molEllison 1996
0.6785052.1 [C6H5CH2]- (g) → C6H5CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.912 ± 0.006 eVGunion 1992
0.1505105.5 [CH(CHCHCHCHCHCH)]- (g) → [C6H5CH2]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -29.02 ± 1.2 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.1285105.2 [CH(CHCHCHCHCHCH)]- (g) → [C6H5CH2]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -28.97 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.1105105.1 [CH(CHCHCHCHCHCH)]- (g) → [C6H5CH2]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -28.97 ± 1.4 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0845105.3 [CH(CHCHCHCHCHCH)]- (g) → [C6H5CH2]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -29.24 ± 1.6 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0645063.5 [C6H5CH2]- (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → C6H5CH3 (g) + [CH3CH2]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 37.14 ± 0.85 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0575063.2 [C6H5CH2]- (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → C6H5CH3 (g) + [CH3CH2]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 37.76 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0575063.4 [C6H5CH2]- (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → C6H5CH3 (g) + [CH3CH2]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 37.81 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0465063.3 [C6H5CH2]- (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → C6H5CH3 (g) + [CH3CH2]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 36.73 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0425063.1 [C6H5CH2]- (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → C6H5CH3 (g) + [CH3CH2]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 38.11 ± 0.90 (×1.164) kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0095052.10 [C6H5CH2]- (g) → C6H5CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.926 ± 0.050 eVRuscic W1RO
0.0075052.3 [C6H5CH2]- (g) → C6H5CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 6964 ± 450 cm-1Drzaic 1984, note unc3
0.0065052.7 [C6H5CH2]- (g) → C6H5CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.951 ± 0.061 eVRuscic G4
0.0055059.5 C6H5CH3 (g) → [C6H5CH2]- (g) + H+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 381.60 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0045061.1 [C6H5CH2]- (g) + CH3CH2OH (g) → C6H5CH3 (g) + [CH3CH2O]- (g) ΔrG°(338 K) = -5.6 ± 2 (×3.668) kJ/molGal 2001, est unc
0.0035052.6 [C6H5CH2]- (g) → C6H5CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.982 ± 0.085 eVRuscic G3X
0.0035061.2 [C6H5CH2]- (g) + CH3CH2OH (g) → C6H5CH3 (g) + [CH3CH2O]- (g) ΔrG°(298.15 K) = -2.7 ± 2.0 kcal/molBartmess 1979
0.0035052.9 [C6H5CH2]- (g) → C6H5CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.960 ± 0.090 eVRuscic CBS-n
0.0025052.8 [C6H5CH2]- (g) → C6H5CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.899 ± 0.092 eVRuscic CBS-n
References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122p of the Thermochemical Network (2020); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   P. B. Changala, T. L. Nguyen, J. H. Baraban, G. B. Ellison, J. F. Stanton, D. H. Bross, and B. Ruscic,
Active Thermochemical Tables: The Adiabatic Ionization Energy of Hydrogen Peroxide.
J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 8799-8806 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b06221] (highlighted on the journal cover)
5   D. Feller, D. H. Bross, and B. Ruscic,
Enthalpy of Formation of N2H4 (Hydrazine) Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 6187-6198 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b06017]
6   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.