Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122g of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122e [4] to include results centered on the determination of the appearance energy of CH3+ from CH4. [5].

Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
EthanolCH3CH2OH (l)CCO-269.72-277.48± 0.23kJ/mol46.0684 ±
0.0017		64-17-5*500

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of CH3CH2OH (l)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 59.6% of the provenance of ΔfH° of CH3CH2OH (l).
A total of 265 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)		TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
23.33162.1 CH3CH2OH (g) + 3 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(305.65 K) = -1408.03 ± 0.40 kJ/molRossini 1932a, Rossini 1934a, note old units, mw conversion
10.73165.2 CH3CH2OH (l) + 3 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(303.15 K) = -1367.06 ± 0.26 (×2.327) kJ/molChao 1965, mw conversion
9.93264.1 CH3CHO (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(355.15 K) = -16.752 ± 0.100 kcal/molDolliver 1938, note unc
3.1118.2 1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/molRossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
2.53155.13 CH3CH2OH (g) → 2 C (g) + O (g) + 6 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 760.68 ± 0.30 kcal/molKarton 2011
1.03690.5 CH3CH2CH2OH (g) + CH3OH (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -3.07 ± 0.85 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.93690.2 CH3CH2CH2OH (g) + CH3OH (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -2.94 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.93690.4 CH3CH2CH2OH (g) + CH3OH (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -2.99 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.93690.1 CH3CH2CH2OH (g) + CH3OH (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -3.04 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.73690.3 CH3CH2CH2OH (g) + CH3OH (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -2.91 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.73155.12 CH3CH2OH (g) → 2 C (g) + O (g) + 6 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 760.75 ± 0.56 kcal/molKarton 2011
0.61888.1 2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g) ΔrG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/molSmith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
0.53661.1 CH3CH2OCH2CH3 (cr,l) + 6 O2 (g) → 4 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -651.58 ± 0.43 kcal/molPihlaja 1968
0.53666.5 CH3CH2OCH2CH3 (g) + H2O (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 6.30 ± 0.85 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.53496.8 CH2(OH)2 (g, conrot gauche) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 6.55 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.43500.8 CH2(OH)2 (g, disrot gauche) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 4.12 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.43660.1 CH3CH2OCH2CH3 (g) + 6 O2 (g) → 4 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -657.51 ± 0.18 (×2.484) kcal/molPilcher 1963
0.43666.2 CH3CH2OCH2CH3 (g) + H2O (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 6.44 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.43666.4 CH3CH2OCH2CH3 (g) + H2O (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 6.88 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.43666.1 CH3CH2OCH2CH3 (g) + H2O (g) → 2 CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 6.59 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G3X

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of CH3CH2OH (l)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation
Coefficent
(%)		Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
98.7 EthanolCH3CH2OH (g)CCO-217.30-235.02± 0.22kJ/mol46.0684 ±
0.0017		64-17-5*0
52.4 1-Hydroxyethylium[CH3CHOH]+ (g)C[CH+]O608.78594.35± 0.40kJ/mol45.0600 ±
0.0017		18682-96-7*0
52.4 1-Hydroxyethylium[CH3CHOH]+ (g, anti)C[CH+]O608.78594.35± 0.40kJ/mol45.0600 ±
0.0017		18682-96-7*1
38.6 EthoxyCH3CH2O (g, X 2A")CC[O]1.48-12.42± 0.48kJ/mol45.0605 ±
0.0017		2154-50-9*51
38.6 EthoxyCH3CH2O (g)CC[O]1.48-11.94± 0.48kJ/mol45.0605 ±
0.0017		2154-50-9*0
38.4 EthoxyCH3CH2O (g, A 2A')CC[O]5.74-8.69± 0.48kJ/mol45.0605 ±
0.0017		2154-50-9*52
38.3 Ethoxide[CH3CH2O]- (g)CC[O-]-163.65-178.59± 0.49kJ/mol45.0610 ±
0.0017		16331-64-9*0
33.3 AcetaldehydeCH3CHO (g)CC=O-155.16-165.64± 0.26kJ/mol44.0526 ±
0.0017		75-07-0*0
32.9 Acetaldehyde cation[CH3CHO]+ (g)CC=[O+]831.83821.85± 0.27kJ/mol44.0520 ±
0.0017		36505-03-0*0
30.8 2-HydroxyethylCH2CH2OH (g, gauche-syn)[CH2]CO-13.06-26.32± 0.61kJ/mol45.0605 ±
0.0017		4422-54-2*1

Most Influential reactions involving CH3CH2OH (l)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient		 TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.2443164.9 CH3CH2OH (l) → CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(320.03 K) = 41.36 ± 0.07 kJ/molCounsell 1970, note unc
0.2443164.4 CH3CH2OH (l) → CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 42.43 ± 0.07 kJ/molPolak 1971, note unc
0.1233165.2 CH3CH2OH (l) + 3 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(303.15 K) = -1367.06 ± 0.26 (×2.327) kJ/molChao 1965, mw conversion
0.1193164.6 CH3CH2OH (l) → CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 42.54 ± 0.10 kJ/molFiock 1931, Rossini 1932a, Rossini 1934a, Green 1961
0.1153164.3 CH3CH2OH (l) → CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 42.523 ± 0.102 kJ/molThermoData 2004
0.0993164.1 CH3CH2OH (l) → CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 42.46 ± 0.11 kJ/molMajer 1985
0.0763164.7 CH3CH2OH (l) → CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 10.15 ± 0.03 kcal/molWadso 1966a
0.0433824.1 HC(O)OCH2CH3 (cr,l) + CH3OH (l) → HC(O)OCH3 (l) + CH3CH2OH (l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -0.68 ± 1.22 kcal/molHine 1974, note unc
0.0273164.8 CH3CH2OH (l) → CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 10.13 ± 0.05 kcal/molMcCurdy 1963, note unc
0.0273164.11 CH3CH2OH (l) → CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(350.57 K) = 9.47 ± 0.05 kcal/molMathews 1926, note unc2
0.0193164.5 CH3CH2OH (l) → CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 42.28 ± 0.25 kJ/molBernardes 2007
0.0123164.13 CH3CH2OH (l) → CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrG°(298.329 K) = 6.337 ± 0.310 kJ/molThermoData 2004, 3rd Law
0.0073164.2 CH3CH2OH (l) → CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 42.59 ± 0.40 kJ/molNBS Tables 1989
0.0053272.1 CH3CHO (cr,l) + H2 (g) → CH3CH2OH (l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -19.44 ± 0.68 (×1.509) kcal/molWiberg 1991
0.0033164.10 CH3CH2OH (l) → CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(351.23 K) = 9.60 ± 0.07 (×2.089) kcal/molBennewitz 1938, ThermoData 2004
0.0023165.3 CH3CH2OH (l) + 3 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(287 K) = -326.2 ± 1.0 kcal/molBerthelot 1892, Rossini 1932a
0.0013165.5 CH3CH2OH (l) + 3 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -325.8 ± 1.2 kcal/molAtwater 1903, Rossini 1932a
0.0013165.6 CH3CH2OH (l) + 3 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(293.15 K) = -327.69 ± 1.28 kcal/molRichards 1920, Parks 1925, Verkade 1927, est unc
0.0013165.7 CH3CH2OH (l) + 3 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(293.15 K) = -326.5 ± 1.6 kcal/molEmery 1911, Rossini 1932a, est unc
0.0003165.4 CH3CH2OH (l) + 3 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(293 K) = -325.0 ± 2.0 kcal/molAtwater 1899, Rossini 1932a, note unc2
References (for your convenience, also available in RIS and BibTex format)
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122g of the Thermochemical Network (2019); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   J. P. Porterfield, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, J. H. Thorpe, T. L. Nguyen, J. H. Baraban, J. F. Stanton, J. W. Daily, and G. B. Ellison,
Thermal Decomposition of Potential Ester Biofuels, Part I: Methyl Acetate and Methyl Butanoate.
J. Chem. Phys. A 121, 4658-4677 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b02639] (Veronica Vaida Festschrift)
5   Y.-C. Chang, B. Xiong, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and C. Y. Ng,
A Vacuum Ultraviolet laser Pulsed Field Ionization-Photoion Study of Methane (CH4): Determination of the Appearance Energy of Methylium From Methane with Unprecedented Precision and the Resulting Impact on the Bond Dissociation Energies of CH4 and CH4+.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 9592-9605 (2017) [DOI: 10.1039/c6cp08200a] (part of 2017 PCCP Hot Articles collection)
6   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.