Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122e of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122d [4] to include chemical species related to methyl acetate and methyl formate [5].

Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
2-PropanolCH3CH(OH)CH3 (g)CC(O)C-249.47-273.57± 0.38kJ/mol60.0950 ±
0.0025		67-63-0*0

Representative Geometry of CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 53.5% of the provenance of ΔfH° of CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g).
A total of 157 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)		TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
12.03687.1 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (cr,l) + 9/2 O2 (g) → 3 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -479.25 ± 0.24 kcal/molParks 1950a, mw conversion
11.23687.2 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (cr,l) + 9/2 O2 (g) → 3 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -479.39 ± 0.10 (×2.484) kcal/molSnelson 1961
6.65157.1 CH3C(O)CH3 (g) → [CH3CO]+ (g) + CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.532 ± 0.006 eVBodi 2015
3.55155.1 CH3C(O)CH3 (g) + 4 O2 (g) → 3 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -435.42 ± 0.44 kcal/molMiles 1941, note unc, note old units
2.83761.2 CH3C(O)OH (g) → OH (g) + [CH3CO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 11.641 ± 0.008 eVShuman 2010
2.43687.3 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (cr,l) + 9/2 O2 (g) → 3 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(303.15 K) = -2006.33 ± 0.22 (×10.15) kJ/molChao 1965, mw conversion
2.05159.2 CH3C(O)CH3 (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) ΔrG°(434 K) = -5.514 ± 0.083 kJ/molBuckley 1965, 3rd Law
1.95237.1 (CH3CO)2 (cr,l) → (CH3CO)2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 9.25 ± 0.25 kcal/molNicholson 1954
1.7118.2 1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/molRossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
1.75161.9 CH3C(O)CH3 (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH3CHO (g) + CH3CHCH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 4.84 ± 0.50 kcal/molPorterfield 2015, est unc
0.83683.5 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 4.15 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.75163.8 CH3C(O)CH3 (g) + CH4 (g) → CH2O (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 18.67 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.75238.1 (CH3CO)2 (g) → CH3CO (g) + [CH3CO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.090 ± 0.006 eVFogleman 2004
0.75162.5 CH3C(O)CH3 (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH2O (g) + CH2C(CH3)2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 9.28 ± 0.85 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.73684.4 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH3CH2OH (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.17 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.63259.1 CH3CHO (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(355.15 K) = -16.752 ± 0.100 kcal/molDolliver 1938, note unc
0.65162.4 CH3C(O)CH3 (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH2O (g) + CH2C(CH3)2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 9.23 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.65162.2 CH3C(O)CH3 (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH2O (g) + CH2C(CH3)2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 8.69 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.65162.1 CH3C(O)CH3 (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH2O (g) + CH2C(CH3)2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 9.05 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.63683.3 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 4.26 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation
Coefficent
(%)		Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
98.6 2-PropanolCH3CH(OH)CH3 (cr,l)CC(O)C-306.20-319.01± 0.38kJ/mol60.0950 ±
0.0025		67-63-0*500
97.6 AcetoneCH3C(O)CH3 (g)CC(=O)C-200.16-216.85± 0.38kJ/mol58.0791 ±
0.0025		67-64-1*0
97.5 AcetoneCH3C(O)CH3 (cr,l)CC(=O)C-245.11-248.22± 0.38kJ/mol58.0791 ±
0.0025		67-64-1*500
45.3 Acetylium[CH3CO]+ (g)C[C+]=O666.52659.23± 0.47kJ/mol43.0441 ±
0.0016		15762-07-9*0
30.9 2,3-Butanedione(CH3CO)2 (g)CC(=O)C(=O)C-310.42-326.98± 0.70kJ/mol86.0892 ±
0.0033		431-03-8*0
29.1 Acetonate[CH3C(O)CH2]- (g)CC(=[O-])[CH2]-187.92-201.47± 0.98kJ/mol57.0717 ±
0.0024		24262-31-5*0
28.5 3-Buten-2-oneCH3C(O)CHCH2 (g, trans)CC(=O)C=C-95.61-111.85± 0.88kJ/mol70.0898 ±
0.0032		78-94-4*1
28.5 3-Buten-2-oneCH3C(O)CHCH2 (g)CC(=O)C=C-95.61-111.15± 0.88kJ/mol70.0898 ±
0.0032		78-94-4*0
26.4 AcetaldehydeCH3CHO (g)CC=O-155.14-165.61± 0.26kJ/mol44.0526 ±
0.0017		75-07-0*0
26.1 Acetaldehyde cation[CH3CHO]+ (g)CC=[O+]831.85821.88± 0.27kJ/mol44.0520 ±
0.0017		36505-03-0*0

Most Influential reactions involving CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient		 TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.9795159.2 CH3C(O)CH3 (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) ΔrG°(434 K) = -5.514 ± 0.083 kJ/molBuckley 1965, 3rd Law
0.3203688.1 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (cr,l) → CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 45.48 ± 0.11 kJ/molMajer 1985
0.2463688.2 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (cr,l) → CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 10.88 ± 0.03 kcal/molHales 1963, as quoted by Cox 1970
0.2353688.3 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (cr,l) → CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 10.83 ± 0.03 (×1.022) kcal/molWadso 1966a
0.1723688.4 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (cr,l) → CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 45.43 ± 0.15 kJ/molPolak 1971, est unc
0.0173688.5 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (cr,l) → CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 10.97 ± 0.10 (×1.114) kcal/molSnelson 1961, Williamson 1957
0.0173684.4 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH3CH2OH (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.17 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0163686.1 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) → CH3CH2OCH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 53.4 ± 4.6 kJ/molKarton 2014
0.0133684.2 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH3CH2OH (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.04 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0133684.3 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH3CH2OH (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.29 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0123683.5 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 4.15 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0113684.1 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH3CH2OH (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.29 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0103683.3 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 4.26 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0103683.4 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 4.37 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0083683.6 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 16.8 ± 4.6 kJ/molKarton 2014
0.0083683.2 CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH2OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 4.36 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0035159.1 CH3C(O)CH3 (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) ΔrH°(355.15 K) = -13.407 ± 0.056 (×5.657) kcal/molDolliver 1938, note unc
0.0035159.3 CH3C(O)CH3 (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH(OH)CH3 (g) ΔrH°(434 K) = -56.62 ± 0.49 (×2.954) kJ/molBuckley 1965, 2nd Law
References (for your convenience, also available in RIS and BibTex format)
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122e of the Thermochemical Network, Argonne National Laboratory (2019); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   L. Cheng, J. Gauss, B. Ruscic, P. Armentrout, and J. Stanton,
Bond Dissociation Energies for Diatomic Molecules Containing 3d Transition Metals: Benchmark Scalar-Relativistic Coupled-Cluster Calculations for Twenty Molecules.
J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 1044-1056 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00970]
5   J. P. Porterfield, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, J. H. Thorpe, T. L. Nguyen, J. H. Baraban, J. F. Stanton, J. W. Daily, and G. B. Ellison,
Thermal Decomposition of Potential Ester Biofuels, Part I: Methyl Acetate and Methyl Butanoate.
J. Chem. Phys. A 121, 4658-4677 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b02639] (Veronica Vaida Festschrift)
6   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.