Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122d of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122b [4][5] to include the enthalpies of formation of methylamine, dimethylamine and trimethylamine that were used as reference values to derive the bond dissociation energies of 20 diatomic molecules containing 3d transition metals.[6].

Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
Ethylene cation[CH2CH2]+ (g)C=[CH2+]1075.221068.01± 0.12kJ/mol28.0526 ±
0.0016		34470-02-5*0

Representative Geometry of [CH2CH2]+ (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of [CH2CH2]+ (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 47.1% of the provenance of ΔfH° of [CH2CH2]+ (g).
A total of 531 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)		TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
10.31991.1 CH2CH2 (g) + 3 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -1411.18 ± 0.30 kJ/molRossini 1937
5.1118.2 1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/molRossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
4.41934.1 CH3CH3 (g) + 7/2 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -1560.68 ± 0.25 kJ/molPittam 1972
2.82841.1 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) → 2 CH2CH2 (g) ΔrG°(750 K) = -13.37 ± 0.12 kcal/molQuick 1972, 3rd Law, note unc3
2.81852.1 2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g) ΔrG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/molSmith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
2.81992.1 CH2CH2 (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH3 (g) ΔrH°(355.15 K) = -32.831 ± 0.05 kcal/molKistiakowsky 1935
2.22632.14 CH2CCH2 (g) + CH4 (g) → 2 CH2CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -8.78 ± 0.8 kJ/molFerguson 2013, est unc
2.12845.1 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 6 O2 (g) → 4 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -650.33 ± 0.12 kcal/molKaarsemaker 1952, Coops 1950, as quoted by Cox 1970
1.83787.1 CH3CH2Cl (g) + 3 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + HCl (aq, 600 H2O) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -337.73 ± 0.14 (×1.091) kcal/molFletcher 1971, as quoted by Pedley 1986
1.61775.2 CO (g) → C+ (g) + O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 22.3713 ± 0.0015 eVNg 2007
1.31992.2 CH2CH2 (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH3 (g) ΔrG°(723.15 K) = -10.867 ± 0.072 kcal/molKistiakowsky 1951
1.32632.11 CH2CCH2 (g) + CH4 (g) → 2 CH2CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -2.24 ± 0.25 kcal/molKarton 2009b, Karton 2011
1.22069.5 2 CH2CH2 (g) → HCCH (g) + CH3CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 9.26 ± 0.20 kcal/molKarton 2007
1.21729.7 C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.464 ± 0.024 kJ/molHawtin 1966, note CO2e
1.11978.1 CH2CH2 (g) → 2 C (g) + 4 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2226.23 ± 0.70 kJ/molHarding 2007, Ferguson 2013
0.92632.12 CH2CCH2 (g) + CH4 (g) → 2 CH2CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -2.38 ± 0.3 kcal/molWheeler 2007
0.92070.2 CH2CH2 (g) → [HCCH]+ (g) + H2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.135 ± 0.005 (×1.269) eVMahnert 1996
0.92070.1 CH2CH2 (g) → [HCCH]+ (g) + H2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.135 ± 0.005 (×1.269) eVMalow 1999, est unc
0.81977.13 CH2CH2 (g) → 2 C (g) + 4 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 532.06 ± 0.20 kcal/molKarton 2007
0.82531.12 CH3CH2CH3 (g) + CH4 (g) → 2 CH3CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.96 ± 0.20 kcal/molKarton 2011, Karton 2009b

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of [CH2CH2]+ (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation
Coefficent
(%)		Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
99.9 EthyleneCH2CH2 (g)C=C60.9152.39± 0.12kJ/mol28.0532 ±
0.0016		74-85-1*0
65.4 EthaneCH3CH3 (g)CC-68.33-83.96± 0.13kJ/mol30.0690 ±
0.0017		74-84-0*0
57.3 ChloroethaneCH3CH2Cl (g)CCCl-96.80-111.38± 0.20kJ/mol64.5138 ±
0.0019		75-00-3*0
55.7 ChloroethaneCH3CH2Cl (cr,l)CCCl-134.19-135.81± 0.20kJ/mol64.5138 ±
0.0019		75-00-3*500
47.6 Acetylene cation[HCCH]+ (g)C#[CH+]1328.841328.18± 0.13kJ/mol26.0367 ±
0.0016		25641-79-6*0
47.6 AcetyleneHCCH (g)C#C228.83228.27± 0.13kJ/mol26.0373 ±
0.0016		74-86-2*0
45.9 Carbon atomC (g)[C]711.407716.892± 0.048kJ/mol12.01070 ±
0.00080		7440-44-0*0
45.9 Carbon atomC (g, triplet)[C]711.407716.892± 0.048kJ/mol12.01070 ±
0.00080		7440-44-0*1
45.9 Carbon atomC (g, quintuplet)[C]1114.9701120.117± 0.048kJ/mol12.01070 ±
0.00080		7440-44-0*3
45.9 Carbon atomC (g, singlet)[C]833.338838.485± 0.048kJ/mol12.01070 ±
0.00080		7440-44-0*2

Most Influential reactions involving [CH2CH2]+ (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient		 TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.5681979.2 CH2CH2 (g) → [CH2CH2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 84790.2 ± 0.4 cm-1Xing 2006, note unc
0.4291979.1 CH2CH2 (g) → [CH2CH2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 84790.42 ± 0.46 cm-1Willitsch 2004, note unc
0.0864476.1 [C6H5]+ (g, triplet) + 2 CH2CH2 (g) → C6H6 (g) + [CH2CH2]+ (g) + CH2CH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 24.88 ± 1.5 kcal/molRuscic G3B3
0.0344476.2 [C6H5]+ (g, triplet) + 2 CH2CH2 (g) → C6H6 (g) + [CH2CH2]+ (g) + CH2CH (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 106 ± 10 kJ/molNicolaides 1997
0.0094476.3 [C6H5]+ (g, triplet) + 2 CH2CH2 (g) → C6H6 (g) + [CH2CH2]+ (g) + CH2CH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.979 ± 0.2 eVKlippenstein 1997, note unc4
0.0011979.3 CH2CH2 (g) → [CH2CH2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 84799 ± 5 (×1.756) cm-1Williams 1991
0.0001986.8 [CH2CH2]+ (g) → 2 C (g) + 4 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 289.95 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0001986.4 [CH2CH2]+ (g) → 2 C (g) + 4 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 289.20 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0001986.7 [CH2CH2]+ (g) → 2 C (g) + 4 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 288.55 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0001986.3 [CH2CH2]+ (g) → 2 C (g) + 4 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 289.15 ± 1.72 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0001980.7 CH2CH2 (g) → [CH2CH2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.515 ± 0.003 eVMasclet 1973
0.0001980.4 CH2CH2 (g) → [CH2CH2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.517 ± 0.002 (×2.181) eVStockbauer 1975
0.0001980.5 CH2CH2 (g) → [CH2CH2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.517 ± 0.003 (×1.477) eVStockbauer 1975a
0.0001980.8 CH2CH2 (g) → [CH2CH2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.511 ± 0.005 eVBrehm 1966
0.0001980.2 CH2CH2 (g) → [CH2CH2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.514 ± 0.005 eVDehmer 1979, est unc
0.0001980.6 CH2CH2 (g) → [CH2CH2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.507 ± 0.004 (×1.445) eVKnowles 1974
0.0001980.9 CH2CH2 (g) → [CH2CH2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.507 ± 0.004 (×1.445) eVNicholson 1965
0.0001979.4 CH2CH2 (g) → [CH2CH2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 84750 ± 50 cm-1Price 1940, est unc
0.0001980.1 CH2CH2 (g) → [CH2CH2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.514 ± 0.007 eVCarlier 1979
0.0001980.10 CH2CH2 (g) → [CH2CH2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.515 ± 0.010 eVWatanabe 1962
References (for your convenience, also available in RIS and BibTex format)
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122d of the Thermochemical Network, Argonne National Laboratory (2018); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   B. Ruscic,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Sequential Bond Dissociation Enthalpies of Methane, Ethane, and Methanol and the Related Thermochemistry.
J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 7810-7837 (2015) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b01346]
5   T. L. Nguyen, J. H. Baraban, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton,
On the HCN – HNC Energy Difference.
J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 10929-10934 (2015) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b08406]
6   L. Cheng, J. Gauss, B. Ruscic, P. Armentrout, and J. Stanton,
Bond Dissociation Energies for Diatomic Molecules Containing 3d Transition Metals: Benchmark Scalar-Relativistic Coupled-Cluster Calculations for Twenty Molecules.
J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 1044-1056 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00970]
7   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [7]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.