Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122d of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122b [4][5] to include the enthalpies of formation of methylamine, dimethylamine and trimethylamine that were used as reference values to derive the bond dissociation energies of 20 diatomic molecules containing 3d transition metals.[6].

Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
Hydrogen peroxideH2O2 (g)OO-129.492-135.478± 0.063kJ/mol34.01468 ±
0.00062		7722-84-1*0

Representative Geometry of H2O2 (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of H2O2 (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 75.5% of the provenance of ΔfH° of H2O2 (g).
A total of 133 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)		TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
28.2231.1 H2O2 (g) → 2 OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 17051.8 ± 3.4 cm-1Luo 1992
26.1118.2 1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/molRossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
2.5227.3 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O (cr,l) + 1/2 O2 (g) ΔrH°(293.15 K) = -23.48 ± 0.03 (×1.874) kcal/molRoth 1930, est unc
2.11852.1 2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g) ΔrG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/molSmith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
2.01851.4 CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -890.61 ± 0.21 kJ/molDale 2002
1.8227.4 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O (cr,l) + 1/2 O2 (g) ΔrH°(293.15 K) = -23.47 ± 0.02 (×3.292) kcal/molMatheson 1929, est unc
1.5161.1 [OH]- (g) → O- (g) + H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 4.7796 ± 0.0010 (×1.682) eVMartin 2001, est unc
1.31851.6 CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -890.44 ± 0.26 kJ/molGOMB Ref Calorimeter, Alexandrov 2002
1.2214.4 H2O2 (g) → 2 H (g) + 2 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1054.84 ± 0.56 kJ/molHarding 2008
1.21412.1 N2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) + 2 H+ (aq) → 3/2 O2 (g) + 2 [NH4]+ (aq) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 141.292 ± 0.119 kcal/molVanderzee 1972c
0.8227.1 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O (cr,l) + 1/2 O2 (g) ΔrH°(300.05 K) = -23.44 ± 0.02 (×4.757) kcal/molGiguere 1955
0.7214.2 H2O2 (g) → 2 H (g) + 2 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1055.04 ± 0.70 kJ/molHarding 2008
0.71934.1 CH3CH3 (g) + 7/2 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -1560.68 ± 0.25 kJ/molPittam 1972
0.71851.5 CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -890.43 ± 0.35 kJ/molAlexandrov 2002a, Alexandrov 2002
0.71851.1 CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(303.15 K) = -889.849 ± 0.350 kJ/molRossini 1931a, Rossini 1931b, Prosen 1945, Rossini 1940, note CH4
0.7214.3 H2O2 (g) → 2 H (g) + 2 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1054.64 ± 0.74 kJ/molHarding 2008
0.6214.1 H2O2 (g) → 2 H (g) + 2 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1054.81 ± 0.75 kJ/molTajti 2004, est unc
0.51782.3 CO (g) + H2O (g) → CO2 (g) + H2 (g) ΔrG°(893 K) = -6.369 ± 0.283 kJ/molMeyer 1938, note COi, 3rd Law
0.51775.2 CO (g) → C+ (g) + O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 22.3713 ± 0.0015 eVNg 2007
0.5214.7 H2O2 (g) → 2 H (g) + 2 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1054.42 ± 0.84 kJ/molHarding 2008

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of H2O2 (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation
Coefficent
(%)		Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
100.0 Hydrogen peroxideH2O2 (g, para)OO-129.492-135.478± 0.063kJ/mol34.01468 ±
0.00062		7722-84-1*2
100.0 Hydrogen peroxideH2O2 (g, ortho)OO-129.472-135.478± 0.063kJ/mol34.01468 ±
0.00062		7722-84-1*1
78.5 HydroxylOH (g)[OH]37.24237.482± 0.027kJ/mol17.00734 ±
0.00031		3352-57-6*0
78.5 Hydroxyde[OH]- (g)[OH-]-139.099-139.066± 0.027kJ/mol17.00789 ±
0.00031		14280-30-9*0
78.4 WaterH2O (g, ortho)O-238.654-241.842± 0.027kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*1
78.4 WaterH2O (g, para)O-238.938-241.842± 0.027kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*2
78.4 WaterH2O (g)O-238.938-241.842± 0.027kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*0
78.4 WaterH2O (l, eq.press.)O-285.838± 0.027kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*589
78.4 WaterH2O (l)O-285.836± 0.027kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*590
78.4 WaterH2O (cr, l, eq.press.)O-286.310-285.838± 0.027kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*499

Most Influential reactions involving H2O2 (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient		 TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
1.000219.1 H2O2 (g, para) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0 ± 0 cm-1triv, Hougen 1984
0.912231.1 H2O2 (g) → 2 OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 17051.8 ± 3.4 cm-1Luo 1992
0.720215.1 H2O2 (g) → [H2O2]+ (g, trans) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.631 ± 0.007 eVLitorja 1998a
0.542228.9 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 51.925 ± 0.073 kJ/molScatchard 1952, 3rd Law, apud Gurvich TPIS
0.3991681.6 HOONO (g, trans, perp) + H2O (g) → HONO (g, trans) + H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 6.93 ± 0.15 kcal/molMcGrath 2005
0.3551515.1 NH2OH (g, trans) + H2O (g) → H2O2 (g) + NH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 24.9 ± 0.2 kcal/molFeller 2003, est unc
0.245858.7 ClOOCl (g) + 2 HOCl (g) → H2O2 (g) + 2 ClOCl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.44 ± 0.30 kcal/molKarton 2009c
0.244896.4 2 HOOCl (g) → H2O2 (g) + ClOOCl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.35 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.198896.2 2 HOOCl (g) → H2O2 (g) + ClOOCl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.55 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.163896.1 2 HOOCl (g) → H2O2 (g) + ClOOCl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.72 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.153610.9 FOOF (g) + 2 OH (g) → H2O2 (g) + 2 FO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -4.55 ± 0.25 kcal/molKarton 2009c
0.148611.9 FOOF (g) + H2O (g) → H2O2 (g) + FOF (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 23.92 ± 0.25 kcal/molKarton 2009c
0.141857.7 ClOOCl (g) + H2O (g) → ClOCl (g) + H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.27 ± 0.30 kcal/molKarton 2009c
0.138858.6 ClOOCl (g) + 2 HOCl (g) → H2O2 (g) + 2 ClOCl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.43 ± 0.40 kcal/molKarton 2009c
0.1303227.9 CH3OOH (g) + H2O (g) → CH3OH (g) + H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 8.0 ± 0.5 kcal/molMatthews 2005, est unc
0.128228.4 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 51.92 ± 0.15 kJ/molMaass 1924, 3rd Law, apud Gurvich TPIS
0.117298.2 HOOOH (g, trans) → H2O2 (g) + O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 47.51 ± 0.5 kcal/molDenis 2009, est unc
0.117896.3 2 HOOCl (g) → H2O2 (g) + ClOOCl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.15 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.1161689.5 HOON(O)O (g) + H2O (g) → HNO3 (g) + H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 6.31 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.114252.8 [H2OOH]+ (g, trans) + H2O (g) → H2O2 (g) + [H3O]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -5.35 ± 0.8 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
References (for your convenience, also available in RIS and BibTex format)
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122d of the Thermochemical Network, Argonne National Laboratory (2018); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   B. Ruscic,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Sequential Bond Dissociation Enthalpies of Methane, Ethane, and Methanol and the Related Thermochemistry.
J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 7810-7837 (2015) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b01346]
5   T. L. Nguyen, J. H. Baraban, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton,
On the HCN – HNC Energy Difference.
J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 10929-10934 (2015) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b08406]
6   L. Cheng, J. Gauss, B. Ruscic, P. Armentrout, and J. Stanton,
Bond Dissociation Energies for Diatomic Molecules Containing 3d Transition Metals: Benchmark Scalar-Relativistic Coupled-Cluster Calculations for Twenty Molecules.
J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 1044-1056 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00970]
7   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [7]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.