Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was partially described in Ruscic et al. [4], and was also used for the initial development of high-accuracy ANLn composite electronic structure methods [5].

Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
Hydrogen peroxideH2O2 (cr,l)OO-193.162-187.345± 0.080kJ/mol34.01468 ±
0.00062		7722-84-1*500

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of H2O2 (cr,l)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 82.6% of the provenance of ΔfH° of H2O2 (cr,l).
A total of 47 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)		TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
20.8226.9 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 51.925 ± 0.073 kJ/molScatchard 1952, 3rd Law, as quoted by Gurvich TPIS
15.3117.2 1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/molRossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
14.1229.1 H2O2 (g) → 2 OH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 17051.8 ± 3.4 cm-1Luo 1992
6.5225.3 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O (cr,l) + 1/2 O2 (g) ΔrH°(293.15 K) = -23.48 ± 0.03 (×2) kcal/molRoth 1930, est unc
4.9226.4 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 51.92 ± 0.15 kJ/molMaass 1924, 3rd Law, as quoted by Gurvich TPIS
4.7225.4 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O (cr,l) + 1/2 O2 (g) ΔrH°(293.15 K) = -23.47 ± 0.02 (×3.513) kcal/molMatheson 1929, est unc
4.3226.7 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 51.75 ± 0.16 kJ/molEgerton 1951, 3rd Law, as quoted by Gurvich TPIS
2.3225.1 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O (cr,l) + 1/2 O2 (g) ΔrH°(300.05 K) = -23.44 ± 0.02 (×4.967) kcal/molGiguere 1955
1.21641.4 CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -890.61 ± 0.21 kJ/molDale 2002
1.11642.1 2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g) ΔrG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/molSmith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
0.8159.1 [OH]- (g) → O- (g) + H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 4.7796 ± 0.0010 (×1.795) eVMartin 2001, est unc
0.81641.6 CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -890.44 ± 0.26 kJ/molGOMB Ref Calorimeter, Alexandrov 2002
0.71208.1 N2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) + 2 H+ (aq) → 3/2 O2 (g) + 2 [NH4]+ (aq) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 141.292 ± 0.119 kcal/molVanderzee 1972c
0.6212.4 H2O2 (g) → 2 H (g) + 2 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1054.84 ± 0.56 kJ/molHarding 2008
0.6227.5 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(318.15 K) = 12.119 ± 0.1 kcal/molGiguere 1962, est unc
0.6227.6 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(333.15 K) = 11.949 ± 0.1 kcal/molGiguere 1962, est unc
0.6227.1 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(300.05 K) = 12.315 ± 0.1 kcal/molGiguere 1955, note H2O2c
0.6227.2 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(273.15 K) = 12.59 ± 0.1 kcal/molFoley 1951, note H2O2b
0.6227.3 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(273.15 K) = 12.616 ± 0.1 kcal/molGiguere 1962, est unc
0.6227.4 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 12.337 ± 0.1 kcal/molGiguere 1962, est unc

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of H2O2 (cr,l)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation
Coefficent
(%)		Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
73.8 Hydrogen peroxideH2O2 (g)OO-129.472-135.457± 0.064kJ/mol34.01468 ±
0.00062		7722-84-1*0
73.8 Hydrogen peroxideH2O2 (g, para)OO-129.472-135.457± 0.064kJ/mol34.01468 ±
0.00062		7722-84-1*2
73.8 Hydrogen peroxideH2O2 (g, ortho)OO-129.451-135.458± 0.064kJ/mol34.01468 ±
0.00062		7722-84-1*1
59.4 HydroxylOH (g)[OH]37.25037.490± 0.027kJ/mol17.00734 ±
0.00031		3352-57-6*0
59.4 Hydroxyde[OH]- (g)[OH-]-139.091-139.058± 0.027kJ/mol17.00789 ±
0.00031		14280-30-9*0
59.4 WaterH2O (l, eq.press.)O-285.830± 0.027kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*589
59.4 WaterH2O (g, ortho)O-238.646-241.834± 0.027kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*1
59.4 WaterH2O (g, para)O-238.931-241.834± 0.027kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*2
59.4 WaterH2O (g)O-238.931-241.834± 0.027kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*0
59.4 WaterH2O (l)O-285.828± 0.027kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*590

Most Influential reactions involving H2O2 (cr,l)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient		 TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.548226.9 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 51.925 ± 0.073 kJ/molScatchard 1952, 3rd Law, as quoted by Gurvich TPIS
0.522228.3 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (aq) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3.39 ± 0.40 kJ/molNBS Tables 1989
0.477228.2 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (aq) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -0.819 ± 0.100 kcal/molGiguere 1955, est unc
0.130226.4 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 51.92 ± 0.15 kJ/molMaass 1924, 3rd Law, as quoted by Gurvich TPIS
0.114226.7 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 51.75 ± 0.16 kJ/molEgerton 1951, 3rd Law, as quoted by Gurvich TPIS
0.072225.3 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O (cr,l) + 1/2 O2 (g) ΔrH°(293.15 K) = -23.48 ± 0.03 (×2) kcal/molRoth 1930, est unc
0.053225.4 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O (cr,l) + 1/2 O2 (g) ΔrH°(293.15 K) = -23.47 ± 0.02 (×3.513) kcal/molMatheson 1929, est unc
0.026225.1 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O (cr,l) + 1/2 O2 (g) ΔrH°(300.05 K) = -23.44 ± 0.02 (×4.967) kcal/molGiguere 1955
0.016227.5 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(318.15 K) = 12.119 ± 0.1 kcal/molGiguere 1962, est unc
0.016227.3 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(273.15 K) = 12.616 ± 0.1 kcal/molGiguere 1962, est unc
0.016227.1 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(300.05 K) = 12.315 ± 0.1 kcal/molGiguere 1955, note H2O2c
0.016227.6 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(333.15 K) = 11.949 ± 0.1 kcal/molGiguere 1962, est unc
0.016227.4 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 12.337 ± 0.1 kcal/molGiguere 1962, est unc
0.016227.2 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(273.15 K) = 12.59 ± 0.1 kcal/molFoley 1951, note H2O2b
0.016226.1 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 51.47 ± 0.40 (×1.067) kJ/molNBS Tables 1989
0.000226.6 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 47.51 ± 3.1 (×1.414) kJ/molEgerton 1951, 2nd Law, as quoted by Gurvich TPIS
0.000226.3 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 47.95 ± 4.4 kJ/molMaass 1924, 2nd Law, as quoted by Gurvich TPIS
0.000226.8 H2O2 (cr,l) → H2O2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 52.2 ± 10 kJ/molScatchard 1952, 2nd Law, as quoted by Gurvich TPIS
References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122 of the Thermochemical Network (2016); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   B. Ruscic,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Sequential Bond Dissociation Enthalpies of Methane, Ethane, and Methanol and the Related Thermochemistry.
J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 7810-7837 (2015) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b01346]
5   S. J. Klippenstein, L. B. Harding, and B. Ruscic,
Ab initio Computations and Active Thermochemical Tables Hand in Hand: Heats of Formation of Core Combustion Species.
J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 6580-6602 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b05945]
6   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.