Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.202 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.176 in order to include species related to the thermochemistry of glycine[4].

Nitrogen sesquioxide

Formula: ONN(O)O (g)

CAS RN: 10544-73-7

ATcT ID: 10544-73-7*0

SMILES: O=N-[N](=O)[O]

InChI: InChI=1S/N2O3/c3-1-2(4)5

InChIKey: LZDSILRDTDCIQT-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: N2O3

2D Image:

Aliases: ONN(O)O; Nitrogen sesquioxide; N-Oxonitramide; Dinitrogen trioxide; asym-Dinitrogen trioxide; Nitrogen trioxide; Nitrous anhydride; asym-N2O3; O2NNO; ONNO2

Relative Molecular Mass: 76.01168 ± 0.00091

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
90.73	86.16	± 0.15	kJ/mol

3D Image of ONN(O)O (g)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of ONN(O)O (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 82.7% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of ONN(O)O (g).
A total of 43 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
17.9	1483.1	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 52400 ± 10 cm-1	Callear 1970
17.9	1483.2	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 52400 ± 10 cm-1	Dingle 1975
15.5	1575.10	ONN(O)O (g) → NO (g) + ONO (g)	Δ_rG°(300 K) = -1.84 ± 0.07 kJ/mol	Beattie 1957, 3rd Law, apud Gurvich TPIS
13.8	1483.4	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 52408 ± 10 (×1.139) cm-1	Kley 1973, Miescher 1974, est unc
3.2	1483.3	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 52420 ± 12 (×1.957) cm-1	Miescher 1974, Huber 1979
1.9	1436.3	N2 (g) → N+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 24.2880 ± 0.0009 eV	Tang 2005
1.5	1436.1	N2 (g) → N+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 24.2888 ± 0.0010 eV	Tang 2005
1.5	1436.2	N2 (g) → N+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 24.2883 ± 0.0010 eV	Tang 2005
1.4	1725.3	(NH4)NO3 (cr,l) → N2 (g) + 1/2 O2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(293.65 K) = -49.44 ± 0.06 kcal/mol	Becker 1934
1.1	1575.2	ONN(O)O (g) → NO (g) + ONO (g)	Δ_rG°(263.15 K) = 3.429 ± 0.255 kJ/mol	Solc 1967, 3rd Law
1.0	1575.4	ONN(O)O (g) → NO (g) + ONO (g)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = -1.85 ± 0.15 (×1.834) kJ/mol	Vosper 1976, 3rd Law, apud Gurvich TPIS
0.8	1486.4	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 626.47 ± 0.56 kJ/mol	Harding 2008
0.7	2000.3	ONN(O)O (g) + H2O (g) → 2 HONO (g)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = -3.26 ± 0.15 (×2.089) kJ/mol	Vosper 1976, 3rd Law
0.6	1485.10	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 149.82 ± 0.15 kcal/mol	Karton 2007a, Karton 2008
0.6	1413.11	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 941.14 ± 0.15 kJ/mol	Thorpe 2021
0.6	1483.6	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 6.503 ± 0.004 (×1.682) eV	Brewer 1956, Frisch 1965
0.5	1484.10	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 149.78 ± 0.16 kcal/mol	Feller 2014
0.5	1952.4	HNO (g) → H (g) + N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 823.10 ± 0.56 kJ/mol	Harding 2008
0.5	1486.2	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 626.74 ± 0.70 kJ/mol	Harding 2008
0.5	1498.1	1/2 N2 (g) + 1/2 O2 (g) → NO (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 90.0 ± 0.8 kJ/mol	Szakacs 2011

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of ONN(O)O (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
89.6	Nitrogen dioxide	ONO (g)	36.861	34.054	± 0.064	kJ/mol	46.00554 ± 0.00060	10102-44-0*0
89.6	Nitric oxide	NO (g)	90.622	91.126	± 0.064	kJ/mol	30.00614 ± 0.00031	10102-43-9*0
89.4	Nitrosyl ion	[NO]+ (g)	984.490	984.485	± 0.064	kJ/mol	30.00559 ± 0.00031	14452-93-8*0
87.1	Dinitrogen tetraoxide	O2NNO2 (g)	20.16	10.87	± 0.14	kJ/mol	92.0111 ± 0.0012	10544-72-6*0
86.4	Nitrosyl chloride	ClNO (g)	54.457	52.555	± 0.066	kJ/mol	65.45884 ± 0.00095	2696-92-6*0
84.3	Dioxohydrazine	ONNO (g)	172.90	171.13	± 0.14	kJ/mol	60.01228 ± 0.00062	16824-89-8*0
84.3	Dioxohydrazine	ONNO (g, cis)	172.90	171.13	± 0.14	kJ/mol	60.01228 ± 0.00062	16824-89-8*2
75.1	Nitrous acid	HONO (g)	-72.988	-78.645	± 0.077	kJ/mol	47.01348 ± 0.00061	7782-77-6*0
75.1	Nitrous acid	HONO (g, trans)	-72.988	-79.132	± 0.077	kJ/mol	47.01348 ± 0.00061	7782-77-6*1
73.4	Nitric oxide	NO (aq, undissoc)		79.213	± 0.078	kJ/mol	30.00614 ± 0.00031	10102-43-9*1000

Most Influential reactions involving ONN(O)O (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.800	1575.10	ONN(O)O (g) → NO (g) + ONO (g)	Δ_rG°(300 K) = -1.84 ± 0.07 kJ/mol	Beattie 1957, 3rd Law, apud Gurvich TPIS
0.463	1567.3	ONN(O)O (g) → [ONN(O)O]+ (g, vdW)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 9.660 ± 0.073 eV	Ruscic G4
0.285	1567.2	ONN(O)O (g) → [ONN(O)O]+ (g, vdW)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 9.765 ± 0.093 eV	Ruscic G3X
0.269	1590.9	ONN(O)O (g) → ONONO (g, t, t)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 294 ± 200 cm-1	Ruscic ab initio
0.251	1567.4	ONN(O)O (g) → [ONN(O)O]+ (g, vdW)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 9.741 ± 0.099 eV	Ruscic CBS-n
0.196	1569.7	[ONN(O)O]- (g, non-vdW) → ONN(O)O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 1.894 ± 0.050 eV	Ruscic W1RO
0.171	1606.8	ONN(O)O (g) → N(O3)N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 122.03 ± 1.2 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.165	1600.4	ONN(OO) (g, trans) + ONO (g) → ONN(O)O (g) + N(OO) (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.16 ± 0.9 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.146	1606.4	ONN(O)O (g) → N(O3)N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 121.96 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.146	1606.7	ONN(O)O (g) → N(O3)N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 123.08 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.140	1568.6	[ONN(O)O]- (g, vdW) → ONN(O)O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 2.005 ± 0.050 eV	Ruscic W1RO
0.134	1600.3	ONN(OO) (g, trans) + ONO (g) → ONN(O)O (g) + N(OO) (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.46 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.134	1600.2	ONN(OO) (g, trans) + ONO (g) → ONN(O)O (g) + N(OO) (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.95 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.131	1569.4	[ONN(O)O]- (g, non-vdW) → ONN(O)O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 1.830 ± 0.061 eV	Ruscic G4
0.125	1606.3	ONN(O)O (g) → N(O3)N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 122.61 ± 1.4 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.122	1599.4	ONN(OO) (g, trans) → ONN(O)O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -77.05 ± 1.2 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.110	1600.1	ONN(OO) (g, trans) + ONO (g) → ONN(O)O (g) + N(OO) (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.12 ± 1.1 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.106	2000.3	ONN(O)O (g) + H2O (g) → 2 HONO (g)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = -3.26 ± 0.15 (×2.089) kJ/mol	Vosper 1976, 3rd Law
0.104	1599.2	ONN(OO) (g, trans) → ONN(O)O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -76.96 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.104	1599.3	ONN(OO) (g, trans) → ONN(O)O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -77.09 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.202 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross Accurate and Reliable Thermochemistry by Data Analysis of Complex Thermochemical Networks using Active Thermochemical Tables: The Case of Glycine Thermochemistry Faraday Discuss. (in press) (2024) [DOI: 10.1039/D4FD00110A]
5		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.