Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.202 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.176 in order to include species related to the thermochemistry of glycine[4].

Sulfur hydroxide oxide

Formula: OHS(O)(O)O (g, eclipsed)

CAS RN: 12337-07-4

ATcT ID: 12337-07-4*2

SMILES: OS(=O)(=O)[O]

InChI: InChI=1S/HO4S/c1-5(2,3)4/h(H,1,2,3)

InChIKey: NIAGBSSWEZDNMT-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: H1O4S1

2D Image:

Aliases: OHS(O)(O)O; Sulfur hydroxide oxide; HOSO3; (SO3)OH; O3SOH; S(OH)O3

Relative Molecular Mass: 97.0715 ± 0.0061

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
-473.7	-483.0	± 2.5	kJ/mol

3D Image of OHS(O)(O)O (g, eclipsed)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of OHS(O)(O)O (g, eclipsed)

The 18 contributors listed below account for 90.3% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of OHS(O)(O)O (g, eclipsed).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
16.5	9850.7	OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, eclipsed)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 34 ± 300 cm-1	Ruscic W1RO
15.4	9850.4	OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, eclipsed)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 73 ± 310 cm-1	Ruscic G4
14.9	9850.3	OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, eclipsed)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 64 ± 315 cm-1	Ruscic G3X
12.1	9850.6	OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, eclipsed)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 99 ± 350 cm-1	Ruscic CBS-n
4.5	9897.4	OS(OH)O (g) + OS(O)O (g) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) + OSO (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -2.20 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
4.0	9897.1	OS(OH)O (g) + OS(O)O (g) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) + OSO (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -3.57 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
2.9	9897.2	OS(OH)O (g) + OS(O)O (g) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) + OSO (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -3.92 ± 0.90 (×1.164) kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
2.5	9845.8	[OHS(O)(O)O]- (g) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 4.882 ± 0.050 eV	Ruscic W1RO
2.4	9853.4	OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) → OH (g) + OS(O)O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 28.66 ± 1.50 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
2.4	9897.3	OS(OH)O (g) + OS(O)O (g) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) + OSO (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.73 ± 1.00 (×1.164) kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
2.1	9853.2	OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) → OH (g) + OS(O)O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 29.69 ± 1.60 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
1.8	9853.1	OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) → OH (g) + OS(O)O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 28.10 ± 1.72 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
1.7	9854.4	OS(O)(OH)2 (g) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 110.00 ± 1.50 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
1.6	9845.5	[OHS(O)(O)O]- (g) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 4.834 ± 0.061 eV	Ruscic G4
1.4	9854.2	OS(O)(OH)2 (g) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 107.65 ± 1.60 (×1.022) kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
1.3	9854.1	OS(O)(OH)2 (g) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 108.88 ± 1.72 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
1.1	9853.3	OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) → OH (g) + OS(O)O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 28.53 ± 2.16 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.8	9845.4	[OHS(O)(O)O]- (g) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 4.886 ± 0.085 eV	Ruscic G3X

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of OHS(O)(O)O (g, eclipsed)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
63.9	Sulfur hydroxide oxide	OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered)	-474.5	-483.9	± 1.6	kJ/mol	97.0715 ± 0.0061	12337-07-4*1
63.9	Sulfur hydroxide oxide	OHS(O)(O)O (g)	-474.5	-483.5	± 1.6	kJ/mol	97.0715 ± 0.0061	12337-07-4*0
29.7	Sulfur hydroxide oxide cation	[OHS(O)(O)O]+ (g, eclipsed)	658.6	647.8	± 3.4	kJ/mol	97.0710 ± 0.0061	12337-07-42
29.7	Sulfur hydroxide oxide cation	[OHS(O)(O)O]+ (g)	658.6	648.3	± 3.4	kJ/mol	97.0710 ± 0.0061	12337-07-40
25.9	Sulfur hydroxide oxide cation	[OHS(O)(O)O]+ (g, staggered)	663.1	652.2	± 3.9	kJ/mol	97.0710 ± 0.0061	12337-07-41
22.9	Sulfo	OS(OH)O (g)	-366.9	-374.7	± 1.1	kJ/mol	81.0721 ± 0.0061	32750-86-0*0
18.6	Hydrogen sulfate	[OHS(O)(O)O]- (g)	-944.0	-954.4	± 1.4	kJ/mol	97.0721 ± 0.0061	14996-02-2*0
16.3	Sulfuric acid	OS(O)(OH)2 (g)	-715.5	-729.7	± 1.1	kJ/mol	98.0795 ± 0.0061	7664-93-9*0
10.1	Sulfate	[OS(O)(O)O]-2 (g)	-599.7	-608.4	± 1.8	kJ/mol	96.0647 ± 0.0061	14808-79-8*0
10.1	Sulfur trioxide	OS(O)O (g)	-389.75	-395.50	± 0.24	kJ/mol	80.0642 ± 0.0061	7446-11-9*0

Most Influential reactions involving OHS(O)(O)O (g, eclipsed)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.279	9850.7	OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, eclipsed)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 34 ± 300 cm-1	Ruscic W1RO
0.261	9850.4	OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, eclipsed)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 73 ± 310 cm-1	Ruscic G4
0.253	9850.3	OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, eclipsed)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 64 ± 315 cm-1	Ruscic G3X
0.205	9850.6	OHS(O)(O)O (g, staggered) → OHS(O)(O)O (g, eclipsed)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 99 ± 350 cm-1	Ruscic CBS-n

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.202 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross Accurate and Reliable Thermochemistry by Data Analysis of Complex Thermochemical Networks using Active Thermochemical Tables: The Case of Glycine Thermochemistry Faraday Discuss. (in press) (2024) [DOI: 10.1039/D4FD00110A]
5		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.