Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.202 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.176 in order to include species related to the thermochemistry of glycine[4].

Fluoromethane

Formula: CH3F (l)

CAS RN: 593-53-3

ATcT ID: 593-53-3*590

SMILES: CF

InChI: InChI=1S/CH3F/c1-2/h1H3

InChIKey: NBVXSUQYWXRMNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: C1H3F1

2D Image:

Aliases: CH3F; Fluoromethane; Methyl fluoride; Methyl monofluoride; Monofluoromethane; Carbon monofluoride; Monofluorocarbon; MeF; UN 2454; Freon 41; HFC 41; FC 41; R 41

Relative Molecular Mass: 34.03292 ± 0.00083

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
	-251.65	± 0.25	kJ/mol

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH3F (l)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 45.1% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH3F (l).
A total of 196 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
11.3	6306.7	4 CH3F (g) → CF4 (g) + 3 CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -218.8 ± 2.5 kJ/mol	Klopper 2010a, est unc
3.0	6653.11	CH3CH2F (g) + CH4 (g) → CH3F (g) + CH3CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 6.78 ± 0.20 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
3.0	6298.5	CH3F (g) → C (g) + 3 H (g) + F (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 397.68 ± 0.30 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
2.4	6552.7	3 CH3F (g) → CHF3 (g) + 2 CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -33.23 ± 0.9 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
2.4	6733.12	HCCH (g) + CH3F (g) → HCCF (g) + CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 8.81 ± 0.20 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
2.0	6716.12	FCCF (g) → 2 C (g) + 2 F (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 376.20 ± 0.30 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
2.0	6444.9	CH2F2 (g) + CH4 (g) → 2 CH3F (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 55.5 ± 2.5 kJ/mol	Klopper 2010a, est unc
1.9	6734.12	HCCF (g) + CH3F (g) → FCCF (g) + CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 14.03 ± 0.20 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
1.9	6552.4	3 CH3F (g) → CHF3 (g) + 2 CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -33.21 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
1.9	6552.6	3 CH3F (g) → CHF3 (g) + 2 CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -34.11 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
1.9	6688.11	CH2CHF (g) + CH4 (g) → CH2CH2 (g) + CH3F (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 8.36 ± 0.20 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
1.6	6552.3	3 CH3F (g) → CHF3 (g) + 2 CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -33.29 ± 1.1 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
1.3	6653.10	CH3CH2F (g) + CH4 (g) → CH3F (g) + CH3CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 6.77 ± 0.30 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
1.2	6301.1	CH3F (g) → C (g) + 3/2 H2 (g) + 1/2 F2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 940.16 ± 2.0 kJ/mol	Csontos 2010
1.1	6552.5	3 CH3F (g) → CHF3 (g) + 2 CH4 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -32.45 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
1.0	6309.12	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rG°(291.98 K) = -8.498 ± 0.200 kJ/mol	Demiriz 1993, 3rd Law, est unc
1.0	6309.16	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rG°(217.885 K) = -2.035 ± 0.200 kJ/mol	Michels 1948, 3rd Law, est unc
1.0	6309.5	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rG°(175 K) = 1.777 ± 0.200 kJ/mol	Li 1961, 3rd Law, est unc
1.0	6309.1	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rG°(165 K) = 2.699 ± 0.200 kJ/mol	Oi 1983, 3rd Law, est unc
1.0	6309.9	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rG°(298.38 K) = -9.053 ± 0.200 kJ/mol	Bominaar 1987, 3rd Law, est unc

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of CH3F (l)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
95.6	Fluoromethane	CH3F (g)	-227.44	-235.47	± 0.24	kJ/mol	34.03292 ± 0.00083	593-53-3*0
36.2	Fluoromethane cation	[CH3F]+ (g)	981.82	974.32	± 0.62	kJ/mol	34.03237 ± 0.00083	59122-96-2*0
30.4	1,2-Difluoroacetylene	FCCF (g)	2.85	5.67	± 0.63	kJ/mol	62.0182 ± 0.0016	689-99-6*0
24.0	Difluoromethane	CH2F2 (g)	-443.32	-450.93	± 0.35	kJ/mol	52.02339 ± 0.00081	75-10-5*0
23.9	Vinyl fluoride	CH2CHF (g)	-134.50	-142.31	± 0.45	kJ/mol	46.0436 ± 0.0016	75-02-5*0
23.4	Fluoroacetylene	HCCF (g)	104.99	105.71	± 0.39	kJ/mol	44.0277 ± 0.0016	2713-09-9*0
22.5	Difluoromethane	CH2F2 (l)		-468.91	± 0.37	kJ/mol	52.02339 ± 0.00081	75-10-5*590
21.9	Fluoroethane	CH3CH2F (g)	-257.24	-272.10	± 0.35	kJ/mol	48.0595 ± 0.0016	353-36-6*0
17.6	Difluorobromomethane	CHF2Br (g)	-411.40	-424.59	± 0.47	kJ/mol	130.9194 ± 0.0013	1511-62-2*0
16.9	Fluoroform	CHF3 (g)	-689.28	-696.23	± 0.40	kJ/mol	70.01385 ± 0.00080	75-46-7*0

Most Influential reactions involving CH3F (l)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.126	6309.11	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rG°(298.38 K) = -9.054 ± 0.200 kJ/mol	Biswas 1989, 3rd Law, est unc
0.126	6309.1	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rG°(165 K) = 2.699 ± 0.200 kJ/mol	Oi 1983, 3rd Law, est unc
0.126	6309.5	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rG°(175 K) = 1.777 ± 0.200 kJ/mol	Li 1961, 3rd Law, est unc
0.126	6309.9	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rG°(298.38 K) = -9.053 ± 0.200 kJ/mol	Bominaar 1987, 3rd Law, est unc
0.126	6309.12	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rG°(291.98 K) = -8.498 ± 0.200 kJ/mol	Demiriz 1993, 3rd Law, est unc
0.126	6309.16	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rG°(217.885 K) = -2.035 ± 0.200 kJ/mol	Michels 1948, 3rd Law, est unc
0.080	6309.7	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rG°(179.733 K) = 1.343 ± 0.250 kJ/mol	Fonseca 1988, Fonseca 1989, 3rd Law, est unc
0.080	6309.3	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rG°(170.67 K) = 2.188 ± 0.250 kJ/mol	Senra 2002, Fonseca 1989, 3rd Law, est unc
0.020	6309.17	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rH°(217.885 K) = 17.19 ± 0.50 kJ/mol	Michels 1948, 2nd Law, est unc
0.020	6309.6	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rH°(175 K) = 17.893 ± 0.50 kJ/mol	Li 1961, 2nd Law, est unc
0.014	6309.8	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rH°(179.733 K) = 17.642 ± 0.600 kJ/mol	Fonseca 1988, Fonseca 1989, 2nd Law, est unc
0.014	6309.4	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rH°(170.67 K) = 18.008 ± 0.600 kJ/mol	Senra 2002, Fonseca 1989, 2nd Law, est unc
0.005	6309.10	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rH°(298.38 K) = 17.16 ± 1.00 kJ/mol	Bominaar 1987, 2nd Law, est unc
0.005	6309.13	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rH°(291.98 K) = 16.96 ± 1.00 kJ/mol	Demiriz 1993, 2nd Law, est unc
0.001	6309.22	CH3F (l) → CH3F (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 4.196 ± 0.5 kcal/mol	Grosse 1940, est unc

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.202 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross Accurate and Reliable Thermochemistry by Data Analysis of Complex Thermochemical Networks using Active Thermochemical Tables: The Case of Glycine Thermochemistry Faraday Discuss. (in press) (2024) [DOI: 10.1039/D4FD00110A]
5		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.