Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.202 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.176 in order to include species related to the thermochemistry of glycine[4].

Propane cation

Formula: [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g)
CAS RN: 34479-70-4
ATcT ID: 34479-70-4*0
SMILES: CC[CH3+]
InChI: InChI=1S/C3H8/c1-3-2/h3H2,1-2H3/q+1
InChIKey: BOAWJBNUJFQAIH-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Hills Formula: C3H8+

2D Image:

CC[CH3+]
Aliases: [CH3CH2CH3]+; Propane cation; Propane ion (1+); CH3CH2CH3+
Relative Molecular Mass: 44.0951 ± 0.0025

   ΔfH°(0 K)   ΔfH°(298.15 K)UncertaintyUnits
974.7954.6± 1.7kJ/mol

3D Image of [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g)

The 10 contributors listed below account for 91.7% of the provenance of ΔfH° of [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
17.43259.2 [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) CH3CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH3 (g) [CH3CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.580 ± 0.039 eVRuscic G3X
14.33259.4 [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) CH3CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH3 (g) [CH3CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.574 ± 0.043 eVRuscic CBS-n
12.03252.1 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.94 ± 0.05 eVStockbauer 1971
12.03252.2 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.95 ± 0.05 eVChupka 1967
12.03252.3 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.97 ± 0.05 eVVlaskov 1969, est unc
11.73259.3 [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) CH3CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH3 (g) [CH3CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.596 ± 0.039 (×1.215) eVRuscic G4
3.83259.5 [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) CH3CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH3 (g) [CH3CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.479 ± 0.035 (×2.378) eVRuscic W1RO
3.03252.8 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.9 ± 0.1 eVBieri 1977
2.83252.4 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 11.06 ± 0.05 (×2.044) eVDewar 1969a, est unc
2.43252.6 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 11.07 ± 0.05 (×2.229) eVTurner 1964, Al-Joboury 1964, est unc

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.


Correlation
Coefficent
(%)
Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass
ATcT ID
18.7 Ethane cation[CH3CH3]+ (g)C[CH3+]1043.151029.14± 0.59kJ/mol30.0685 ±
0.0017
34488-65-8*0
8.4 PropaneCH3CH2CH3 (g)CCC-82.71-104.99± 0.15kJ/mol44.0956 ±
0.0025
74-98-6*0
5.9 n-ButaneCH3CH2CH2CH3 (g)CCCC-98.22-125.53± 0.19kJ/mol58.1222 ±
0.0033
106-97-8*0
5.6 EthaneCH3CH3 (g)CC-68.39-84.01± 0.12kJ/mol30.0690 ±
0.0017
74-84-0*0
5.3 iso-Propylium[CH3CHCH3]+ (g)C[CH+]C822.99805.91± 0.23kJ/mol43.0871 ±
0.0024
19252-53-0*0
5.1 Propylene cation[CH3CHCH2]+ (g)CC=[CH2+]975.20961.67± 0.18kJ/mol42.0792 ±
0.0024
34504-10-4*0
5.1 PropeneCH3CHCH2 (g)CC=C34.9220.08± 0.18kJ/mol42.0797 ±
0.0024
115-07-1*0
4.1 Allyl anion[CH2CHCH2]- (g)C=C[CH2-]134.02123.01± 0.21kJ/mol41.0723 ±
0.0024
1724-46-5*0
4.1 EthyleneCH2CH2 (g)C=C60.9152.40± 0.11kJ/mol28.0532 ±
0.0016
74-85-1*0
4.1 Ethylene cation[CH2CH2]+ (g)C=[CH2+]1075.231068.01± 0.11kJ/mol28.0526 ±
0.0016
34470-02-5*0

Most Influential reactions involving [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.1983259.2 [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) CH3CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH3 (g) [CH3CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.580 ± 0.039 eVRuscic G3X
0.1623259.4 [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) CH3CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH3 (g) [CH3CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.574 ± 0.043 eVRuscic CBS-n
0.1343259.3 [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) CH3CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH3 (g) [CH3CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.596 ± 0.039 (×1.215) eVRuscic G4
0.1213252.2 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.95 ± 0.05 eVChupka 1967
0.1213252.1 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.94 ± 0.05 eVStockbauer 1971
0.1213252.3 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.97 ± 0.05 eVVlaskov 1969, est unc
0.0433259.5 [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) CH3CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH3 (g) [CH3CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.479 ± 0.035 (×2.378) eVRuscic W1RO
0.0303252.8 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.9 ± 0.1 eVBieri 1977
0.0293252.4 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 11.06 ± 0.05 (×2.044) eVDewar 1969a, est unc
0.0243252.5 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 11.07 ± 0.05 (×2.229) eVWatanabe 1962
0.0243252.6 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 11.07 ± 0.05 (×2.229) eVTurner 1964, Al-Joboury 1964, est unc
0.0203252.7 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → [CH3CH2CH3]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 11.08 ± 0.03 (×4.088) eVWatanabe 1957


References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.202 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross
Accurate and Reliable Thermochemistry by Data Analysis of Complex Thermochemical Networks using Active Thermochemical Tables: The Case of Glycine Thermochemistry
Faraday Discuss. (in press) (2024) [DOI: 10.1039/D4FD00110A]
5   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.