Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.202 of the Thermochemical Network [3]This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.176 in order to include species related to the thermochemistry of glycine[4].
|
Trihydrogen cation |
Formula: [H3]+ (g) |
CAS RN: 28132-48-1 |
ATcT ID: 28132-48-1*0 |
SMILES: [H]1[H+][H]1 |
InChI: InChI=1S/H3/c1-2-3-1/q+1 |
InChIKey: RQZCXKHVAUFVMF-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
SMILES: [H][H+][H] |
InChI: InChI=1S/H3/h1H2/q+1 |
InChIKey: QWLPJNYQVKBMAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
Hills Formula: H3+ |
2D Image: |
|
Aliases: [H3]+; Trihydrogen cation; Trihydrogen ion (1+); Triatomic hydrogen cation; Triatomic hydrogen ion (1+) |
Relative Molecular Mass: 3.02327 ± 0.00021 |
ΔfH°(0 K) | ΔfH°(298.15 K) | Uncertainty | Units |
---|
1110.304 | 1106.696 | ± 0.013 | kJ/mol |
|
3D Image of [H3]+ (g) |
|
spin ON spin OFF |
|
Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of [H3]+ (g)The 2 contributors listed below account for 99.2% of the provenance of ΔfH° of [H3]+ (g).
Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.
|
|
Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of [H3]+ (g) |
Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances. The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.
|
Correlation Coefficent (%) | Species Name | Formula | Image | ΔfH°(0 K) | ΔfH°(298.15 K) | Uncertainty | Units | Relative Molecular Mass | ATcT ID | 100.0 | Trihydrogen cation | [H3]+ (g, para) | | 1110.304 | 1106.697 | ± 0.013 | kJ/mol | 3.02327 ± 0.00021 | 28132-48-1*2 | 100.0 | Trihydrogen cation | [H3]+ (g, ortho) | | 1110.577 | 1106.695 | ± 0.013 | kJ/mol | 3.02327 ± 0.00021 | 28132-48-1*1 | 90.9 | Trihydrogen | H(HH) (g, 2p 2A2" Ry) | | 756.931 | 754.146 | ± 0.015 | kJ/mol | 3.02382 ± 0.00021 | 12184-91-7*2 | 20.5 | Trihydrogen | H(HH) (g, 2s 2A1' Ry) | | 745.878 | 743.094 | ± 0.062 | kJ/mol | 3.02382 ± 0.00021 | 12184-91-7*1 | 20.5 | Trihydrogen | H(HH) (g, Ry) | | 745.878 | 743.199 | ± 0.062 | kJ/mol | 3.02382 ± 0.00021 | 12184-91-7*0 | 11.7 | Dioxidenium | [HOO]+ (g) | | 1110.87 | 1107.98 | ± 0.11 | kJ/mol | 33.00619 ± 0.00060 | 12207-52-2*0 | 1.7 | Kryptonium | [KrH]+ (g) | | 1106.29 | 1104.50 | ± 0.68 | kJ/mol | 84.8074 ± 0.1000 | 37276-90-7*0 |
|
Most Influential reactions involving [H3]+ (g)Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.
|
Influence Coefficient | TN ID | Reaction | Measured Quantity | Reference | 1.000 | 101.1 | [H3]+ (g, para) → [H3]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 0. ± 0. cm-1 | Lindsay 2001 | 0.932 | 93.1 | H(HH) (g, 2p 2A2" Ry) → [H3]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 29539.74 ± 0.5 cm-1 | Helm 1988, Lembo 1990 | 0.596 | 297.10 | [H3]+ (g) + O2 (g) → [HOO]+ (g) + H2 (g)  | ΔrG°(80 K) = 0.57 ± 0.13 kJ/mol | Adams 1984, 3rd Law, note unc | 0.575 | 9557.2 | [KrH]+ (g) + H2 (g) → [H3]+ (g) + Kr (g)  | ΔrG°(296 K) = 6.97 ± 0.89 kJ/mol | Payzant 1975, 3rd Law, note unc | 0.496 | 98.6 | [H3]+ (g) → 3 H+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 290399.69 ± 1.5 cm-1 | Cencek 1998, Jaquet 1998, note H3+, Lindsay 2001, Rohse 1993 | 0.496 | 98.7 | [H3]+ (g) → 3 H+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 290398.83 ± 1.5 cm-1 | Cencek 1998, Matyus 2007, Lindsay 2001, Rohse 1993 | 0.202 | 88.1 | (H)(HH) (g, vdW) → [H3]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 74759 ± 200 cm-1 | Pavanello 2009b, Matyus 2007, est unc | 0.194 | 9557.1 | [KrH]+ (g) + H2 (g) → [H3]+ (g) + Kr (g)  | ΔrG°(296 K) = 8.28 ± 1.53 kJ/mol | Bohme 1980, 3rd Law, note unc | 0.159 | 297.11 | [H3]+ (g) + O2 (g) → [HOO]+ (g) + H2 (g)  | ΔrH°(150 K) = 0.33 ± 0.06 kcal/mol | Adams 1984, 2nd Law, note unc | 0.114 | 265.8 | [H2OOH]+ (g, trans) + H2 (g) → HOOH (g) + [H3]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 58.18 ± 0.8 kcal/mol | Ruscic W1RO | 0.077 | 88.6 | (H)(HH) (g, vdW) → [H3]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 9.261 ± 0.040 eV | Ruscic W1RO | 0.077 | 297.12 | [H3]+ (g) + O2 (g) → [HOO]+ (g) + H2 (g)  | ΔrH°(83 K) = 0.94 ± 0.25 (×1.445) kJ/mol | Kluge 2012, est unc | 0.073 | 265.7 | [H2OOH]+ (g, trans) + H2 (g) → HOOH (g) + [H3]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 58.16 ± 1.0 kcal/mol | Ruscic CBS-n | 0.073 | 265.4 | [H2OOH]+ (g, trans) + H2 (g) → HOOH (g) + [H3]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 58.82 ± 1.0 kcal/mol | Ruscic G4 | 0.073 | 585.5 | [HFH]+ (g, singlet) + H2 (g) → HF (g) + [H3]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 15.46 ± 0.8 kcal/mol | Ruscic W1RO, Ruscic W1U | 0.058 | 93.2 | H(HH) (g, 2p 2A2" Ry) → [H3]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 29538 ± 2 cm-1 | Dodhy 1988, est unc | 0.050 | 265.3 | [H2OOH]+ (g, trans) + H2 (g) → HOOH (g) + [H3]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 58.33 ± 1.2 kcal/mol | Ruscic G3X | 0.046 | 585.2 | [HFH]+ (g, singlet) + H2 (g) → HF (g) + [H3]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 15.95 ± 1.0 kcal/mol | Ruscic G4 | 0.046 | 585.4 | [HFH]+ (g, singlet) + H2 (g) → HF (g) + [H3]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 15.47 ± 1.0 kcal/mol | Ruscic CBS-n | 0.043 | 265.6 | [H2OOH]+ (g, trans) + H2 (g) → HOOH (g) + [H3]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 57.48 ± 1.3 kcal/mol | Ruscic CBS-n |
|
|
References
|
1
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004)
[DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
|
2
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005)
[DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
|
3
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.202 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov |
4
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross
Accurate and Reliable Thermochemistry by Data Analysis of Complex Thermochemical Networks using Active Thermochemical Tables: The Case of Glycine Thermochemistry
Faraday Discuss. (in press) (2024)
[DOI: 10.1039/D4FD00110A]
|
5
|
|
B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014)
[DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
|
6
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019)
[DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]
|
|
|
Formula
|
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
|
|
Uncertainties
|
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
|
|
Website Functionality Credits
|
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
|
|
Acknowledgement
|
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.
|