Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.202 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.176 in order to include species related to the thermochemistry of glycine[4].

Propyne cation

Formula: [CH3CCH]+ (g)

CAS RN: 34526-53-9

ATcT ID: 34526-53-9*0

SMILES: CC#[CH+]

InChI: InChI=1S/C3H4/c1-3-2/h1H,2H3/q+1

InChIKey: JHSCZNODJFWRIZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: C3H4+

2D Image:

Aliases: [CH3CCH]+; Propyne cation; Propyne ion (1+); 1-Propyne cation; 1-Propyne ion (1+); Methylacetylene cation; Methylacetylene ion (1+); CH3CCH+

Relative Molecular Mass: 40.0633 ± 0.0024

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
1192.69	1186.97	± 0.38	kJ/mol

3D Image of [CH3CCH]+ (g)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of [CH3CCH]+ (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 74.9% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of [CH3CCH]+ (g).
A total of 126 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
30.2	3458.1	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.364 ± 0.005 eV	Carlier 1975
7.5	3458.4	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.36 ± 0.01 eV	Watanabe 1956
7.5	3458.7	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.37 ± 0.01 eV	Parr 1979
7.5	3458.8	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.37 ± 0.01 eV	Baker 1968
3.3	3458.3	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.349 ± 0.015 eV	Omura 1969
3.3	3458.2	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.365 ± 0.015 eV	Person 1970
1.8	3458.5	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.36 ± 0.02 eV	Matthews 1969
1.8	3458.6	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.37 ± 0.02 eV	Kimura 1981
1.8	3458.9	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.37 ± 0.02 eV	Bieri 1977
1.8	3458.10	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.37 ± 0.02 eV	Brogli 1973
1.4	3474.2	CH3CCH (g) → CH2CCH2 (g)	Δ_rG°(521.5 K) = 1.580 ± 0.062 kcal/mol	Cordes 1959, 3rd Law
1.3	3461.1	CH3CCH (g) + 4 O2 (g) → 3 CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -463.131 ± 0.204 kcal/mol	Wagman 1945, Wagman 1945a
0.8	3463.14	CH3CCH (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → CH3CH2CH3 (g) + HCCH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 21.92 ± 0.8 kJ/mol	Ferguson 2013, est unc
0.7	3465.11	CH3CCH (g) + CH4 (g) → HCCH (g) + CH3CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 33.87 ± 0.8 kJ/mol	Ferguson 2013, est unc
0.7	2376.1	2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g)	Δ_rG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/mol	Smith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
0.7	3464.13	CH3CCH (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH3CHCH2 (g) + HCCH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.57 ± 0.8 kJ/mol	Ferguson 2013, est unc
0.6	3464.11	CH3CCH (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH3CHCH2 (g) + HCCH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 2.30 ± 0.20 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
0.4	125.2	1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/mol	Rossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
0.4	3458.15	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.346 ± 0.040 eV	Ruscic W1RO
0.4	3477.5	CH2CCH2 (g) + [CH3CCH]+ (g) → [CH2CCH2]+ (g) + CH3CCH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.638 ± 0.040 eV	Ruscic W1RO

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of [CH3CCH]+ (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
53.2	Propyne	CH3CCH (g)	192.73	185.58	± 0.20	kJ/mol	40.0639 ± 0.0024	74-99-7*0
35.3	Allene	CH2CCH2 (g)	197.50	190.04	± 0.22	kJ/mol	40.0639 ± 0.0024	463-49-0*0
35.3	Allene cation	[CH2CCH2]+ (g)	1132.29	1125.14	± 0.22	kJ/mol	40.0633 ± 0.0024	65812-77-3*0
21.7	Acetylene	HCCH (g)	228.89	228.34	± 0.12	kJ/mol	26.0373 ± 0.0016	74-86-2*0
21.7	Acetylene cation	[HCCH]+ (g)	1328.91	1328.24	± 0.12	kJ/mol	26.0367 ± 0.0016	25641-79-6*0
21.6	Carbon	C (g, quintuplet)	1114.956	1120.102	± 0.040	kJ/mol	12.01070 ± 0.00080	7440-44-0*3
21.6	Carbon cation	C+ (g)	1797.845	1803.443	± 0.040	kJ/mol	12.01015 ± 0.00080	14067-05-1*0
21.6	Carbon	C (g, triplet)	711.393	716.878	± 0.040	kJ/mol	12.01070 ± 0.00080	7440-44-0*1
21.6	Carbon	C (g)	711.393	716.878	± 0.040	kJ/mol	12.01070 ± 0.00080	7440-44-0*0
21.6	Carbon	C (g, singlet)	833.324	838.470	± 0.040	kJ/mol	12.01070 ± 0.00080	7440-44-0*2

Most Influential reactions involving [CH3CCH]+ (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.426	3458.1	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.364 ± 0.005 eV	Carlier 1975
0.106	3458.7	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.37 ± 0.01 eV	Parr 1979
0.106	3458.8	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.37 ± 0.01 eV	Baker 1968
0.106	3458.4	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.36 ± 0.01 eV	Watanabe 1956
0.047	3458.3	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.349 ± 0.015 eV	Omura 1969
0.047	3458.2	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.365 ± 0.015 eV	Person 1970
0.026	3458.9	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.37 ± 0.02 eV	Bieri 1977
0.026	3458.10	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.37 ± 0.02 eV	Brogli 1973
0.026	3458.6	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.37 ± 0.02 eV	Kimura 1981
0.026	3458.5	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.36 ± 0.02 eV	Matthews 1969
0.006	3477.5	CH2CCH2 (g) + [CH3CCH]+ (g) → [CH2CCH2]+ (g) + CH3CCH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.638 ± 0.040 eV	Ruscic W1RO
0.006	3458.15	CH3CCH (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.346 ± 0.040 eV	Ruscic W1RO
0.005	3478.5	[CH2CCH2]+ (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 13.59 ± 1.2 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.004	3478.4	[CH2CCH2]+ (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 14.93 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.004	3478.2	[CH2CCH2]+ (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 13.63 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.003	3478.1	[CH2CCH2]+ (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 13.90 ± 1.4 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.003	3459.5	[CH3CCH]+ (g) → 3 C (g) + 4 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 432.46 ± 1.50 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.003	3459.2	[CH3CCH]+ (g) → 3 C (g) + 4 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 431.88 ± 1.60 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.003	3459.4	[CH3CCH]+ (g) → 3 C (g) + 4 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 431.40 ± 1.60 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.002	3478.3	[CH2CCH2]+ (g) → [CH3CCH]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 14.53 ± 1.6 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.202 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross Accurate and Reliable Thermochemistry by Data Analysis of Complex Thermochemical Networks using Active Thermochemical Tables: The Case of Glycine Thermochemistry Faraday Discuss. (in press) (2024) [DOI: 10.1039/D4FD00110A]
5		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.