Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.172 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.156 to include species relevant to a study of photodissociation of formamide[4].

Cyclohexane

Formula: CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)
CAS RN: 110-82-7
ATcT ID: 110-82-7*500
SMILES: C1CCCCC1
InChI: InChI=1S/C6H12/c1-2-4-6-5-3-1/h1-6H2
InChIKey: XDTMQSROBMDMFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Hills Formula: C6H12

2D Image:

C1CCCCC1
Aliases: CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2); Cyclohexane; Hexanaphthene; Hexamethylene; Hexahydrobenzene; UN 1145
Relative Molecular Mass: 84.1595 ± 0.0049

   ΔfH°(0 K)   ΔfH°(298.15 K)UncertaintyUnits
-131.81-155.94± 0.28kJ/mol

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 79.7% of the provenance of ΔfH° of CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l).
A total of 54 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
13.54037.1 CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.87 ± 0.13 kcal/molGood 1969
8.24037.2 CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3919.86 ± 0.70 kJ/molJohnson 1946, Prosen 1946
7.94037.3 CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.77 ± 0.17 kcal/molKaarsemaker 1952, as quoted by Cox 1970
5.94036.1 C6H6 (g) + 3 H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) ΔrH°(355. K) = -49.84 ± 0.15 (×1.384) kcal/molKistiakowsky 1936
5.94040.6 CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (g) H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) ΔrH°(355 K) = -28.60 ± 0.10 kcal/molKistiakowsky 1936a
5.0125.2 1/2 O2 (g) H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/molRossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
3.68426.2 CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -941.32 ± 0.16 (×1.067) kcal/molGood 1969
3.38426.1 CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3937.67 ± 0.75 kJ/molJohnson 1946, Prosen 1946
2.94042.1 CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 17/2 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3752.31 ± 0.49 kJ/molSteele 1996
2.88428.1 CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) ΔrG°(298.15 K) = -1.150 ± 0.090 kcal/molGlasebrook 1939, est unc
2.52375.1 H2 (g) C (graphite) → CH4 (g) ΔrG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/molSmith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
2.52228.7 C (graphite) O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.464 ± 0.024 kJ/molHawtin 1966, note CO2e
2.44042.2 CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 17/2 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -896.79 ± 0.13 kcal/molGood 1969
2.34037.5 CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.78 ± 0.31 kcal/molMoore 1940, Moore 1939, Cox 1970
2.24044.2 CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -28.4 ± 0.2 kcal/molRoth 1980a, note unc
2.14037.4 CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.52 ± 0.24 (×1.354) kcal/molSpitzer 1947
1.92373.7 CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -890.578 ± 0.078 kJ/molSchley 2010
1.84042.3 CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) + 17/2 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -896.61 ± 0.12 (×1.242) kcal/molLabbauf 1961
1.02228.5 C (graphite) O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.468 ± 0.038 kJ/molFraser 1952, note CO2f
1.02228.4 C (graphite) O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.462 ± 0.038 kJ/molLewis 1965, note CO2d

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.


Correlation
Coefficent
(%)
Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass
ATcT ID
96.7 CyclohexaneCH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)C1CCCCC1-83.23-122.80± 0.29kJ/mol84.1595 ±
0.0049
110-82-7*0
61.9 MethylcyclopentaneCH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l)CC1CCCC1-116.56-137.92± 0.35kJ/mol84.1595 ±
0.0049
96-37-7*500
60.4 MethylcyclopentaneCH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)CC1CCCC1-68.61-106.13± 0.36kJ/mol84.1595 ±
0.0049
96-37-7*0
54.0 CyclohexeneCH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (g)C1CCC=CC127.17-4.30± 0.32kJ/mol82.1436 ±
0.0049
110-83-8*0
51.9 CyclohexeneCH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l)C1CCC=CC1-21.98-37.85± 0.30kJ/mol82.1436 ±
0.0049
110-83-8*500
47.0 Carbonic acidC(O)(OH)2 (aq, undissoc)OC(=O)O-698.673± 0.028kJ/mol62.0248 ±
0.0012
463-79-6*1000
41.1 WaterH2O (cr,l)O-286.276-285.804± 0.022kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033
7732-18-5*500
41.1 WaterH2O (l)O-285.804± 0.022kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033
7732-18-5*590
41.1 Oxonium[H3O]+ (aq)[OH3+]-285.804± 0.022kJ/mol19.02267 ±
0.00037
13968-08-6*800
41.1 WaterH2O (l, eq.press.)O-285.806± 0.022kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033
7732-18-5*589

Most Influential reactions involving CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.7884038.1 CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 33.12 ± 0.08 kJ/molMajer 1985
0.5468428.1 CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) ΔrG°(298.15 K) = -1.150 ± 0.090 kcal/molGlasebrook 1939, est unc
0.1924037.1 CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.87 ± 0.13 kcal/molGood 1969
0.1164037.2 CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3919.86 ± 0.70 kJ/molJohnson 1946, Prosen 1946
0.1154038.3 CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 7.91 ± 0.05 kcal/molProsen 1946
0.1124037.3 CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.77 ± 0.17 kcal/molKaarsemaker 1952, as quoted by Cox 1970
0.1124044.2 CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -28.4 ± 0.2 kcal/molRoth 1980a, note unc
0.0768428.3 CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -4.47 ± 0.24 kcal/molGood 1969
0.0744038.2 CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 7.983 ± 0.025 (×2.484) kcal/molAston 1943a
0.0708428.2 CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -4.26 ± 0.25 kcal/molJohnson 1946, Prosen 1946
0.0334037.5 CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.78 ± 0.31 kcal/molMoore 1940, Moore 1939, Cox 1970
0.0304037.4 CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -936.52 ± 0.24 (×1.354) kcal/molSpitzer 1947
0.0308428.4 CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3.93 ± 0.35 (×1.091) kcal/molMoore 1939, Moore 1940
0.0184044.6 CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -27.97 ± 0.5 kcal/molMolnar 1984, est unc
0.0034044.5 CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -27.10 ± 1.0 (×1.139) kcal/molTurner 1957, est unc
0.0034044.3 CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) ΔrH°(293 K) = -28.7 ± 1.2 kcal/molLopes 1975
0.0014044.4 CH2(CHCHCH2CH2CH2) (cr,l) H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -26.9 ± 1.8 kcal/molRogers 1971, est unc
0.0004037.6 CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 9 O2 (g) → 6 CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -938.6 ± 2 kcal/molRoth 1915c, Prosen 1946, est unc


References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.172 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   K. L. Caster, N. A. Seifert, B. Ruscic, A. W. Jasper, and K. Prozument,
Dynamics of HCN, NHC, and HNCO Formation in the 193 nm Photodissociation of Formamide
J. Phys. Chem. A (in press) (2024) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c02232]
5   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.