Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.156 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.148 to include species relevant to a recent study of the oxidation of ethylene [4] as well as new measurements that led to refining the thermochemistry of CF and SiF and their cations [5].

Nitric acid

Formula: HON(O)O (aq, 2000 H2O)
CAS RN: 7697-37-2
ATcT ID: 7697-37-2*841
SMILES: O[N+](=O)[O-]
InChI: InChI=1S/HNO3/c2-1(3)4/h(H,2,3,4)
InChIKey: GRYLNZFGIOXLOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N
SMILES: [H+].[N+](=O)([O-])[O-]
InChI: InChI=1S/NO3/c2-1(3)4/q-1/p+1
InChIKey: NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-O
Hills Formula: H1N1O3

2D Image:

O[N+](=O)[O-]
Aliases: HON(O)O; Nitric acid; Azotic acid; Fumic acid; Hydrogen nitrate; NSC 147791; NSC 15203; Nital; Nitryl hydroxide; Aqua fortis; UN 2032; HNO3; HONO2
Relative Molecular Mass: 63.01288 ± 0.00091

   ΔfH°(0 K)   ΔfH°(298.15 K)UncertaintyUnits
-206.30± 0.18kJ/mol

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of HON(O)O (aq, 2000 H2O)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 87.5% of the provenance of ΔfH° of HON(O)O (aq, 2000 H2O).
A total of 28 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
39.71711.3 (NH4)NO3 (cr,l) → N2 (g) + 1/2 O2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(293.65 K) = -49.44 ± 0.06 kcal/molBecker 1934
15.92020.1 ONO (g) + 1/2 O2 (g) H2O (g) → 2 HON(O)O (g) ΔrG°(371 K) = -6.04 ± 0.63 kJ/molJones 1943, 3rd Law
6.22019.1 ONO (g) H2O (g) → NO (g) + 2 HON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(293.1 K) = -8.95 ± 0.24 kcal/molForsythe 1942, Chambers 1937, Wilson 1940, apud Gurvich TPIS
5.92040.1 HON(O)O (cr,l) → HON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(293.15 K) = 9.426 ± 0.030 kcal/molWilson 1940, est unc
4.02019.4 ONO (g) H2O (g) → NO (g) + 2 HON(O)O (g) ΔrG°(298.15 K) = 10.33 ± 1.08 (×1.164) kJ/molChambers 1937, 3rd Law
2.32072.1 NO (g) + 3/2 O2 (g) H2O (cr,l) → 2 HON(O)O (aq) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -74.05 ± 0.5 kcal/molForsythe 1942, est unc
2.12040.4 HON(O)O (cr,l) → HON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 9.33 ± 0.05 kcal/molNBS Tables 1989, est unc
1.62035.2 [ON(O)O]- (g) HBr (g) → Br- (g) HON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(391 K) = -1.03 ± 0.21 kcal/molDavidson 1977, 2nd Law
1.42019.2 ONO (g) H2O (g) → NO (g) + 2 HON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -9.184 ± 0.5 kcal/molForsythe 1942, est unc
1.42019.3 ONO (g) H2O (g) → NO (g) + 2 HON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -9.124 ± 0.5 kcal/molForsythe 1942, Chambers 1937, est unc
1.01469.1 NO (g) → N (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 52400 ± 10 cm-1Callear 1970
1.01469.2 NO (g) → N (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 52400 ± 10 cm-1Dingle 1975
0.71469.4 NO (g) → N (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 52408 ± 10 (×1.189) cm-1Kley 1973, Miescher 1974, est unc
0.61712.1 NH3 (g) → NH3 (aq, undissoc) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -8.448 ± 0.015 kcal/molVanderzee 1972
0.52035.1 [ON(O)O]- (g) HBr (g) → Br- (g) HON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.045 ± 0.015 eVFerguson 1972b
0.5125.2 1/2 O2 (g) H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/molRossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
0.52040.3 HON(O)O (cr,l) → HON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(293.15 K) = 9.350 ± 0.100 kcal/molForsythe 1942, Wilson 1940
0.52040.2 HON(O)O (cr,l) → HON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(293.15 K) = 9.450 ± 0.100 kcal/molWilson 1940, Forsythe 1942
0.41720.2 (NH4)NO3 (cr,l) → [NH4]+ (aq) [ON(O)O]- (aq) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 25.544 ± 0.030 kJ/molVanderzee 1980, Vanderzee 1980a, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals
0.42016.1 NH3 (g) + 3 H2O (g) → HON(O)O (g) + 4 H2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 631.27 ± 2.0 kJ/molKlippenstein 2017

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of HON(O)O (aq, 2000 H2O)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.


Correlation
Coefficent
(%)
Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass
ATcT ID
99.9 Nitric acidHON(O)O (aq, 1000 H2O)O[N+](=O)[O-]-206.23± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091
7697-37-2*839
99.9 Nitric acidHON(O)O (aq, 25 H2O)O[N+](=O)[O-]-206.00± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091
7697-37-2*819
99.9 Nitric acidHON(O)O (aq, 100 H2O)O[N+](=O)[O-]-206.05± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091
7697-37-2*828
99.9 Nitric acidHON(O)O (aq, 4 H2O)O[N+](=O)[O-]-200.29± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091
7697-37-2*807
99.9 Nitric acidHON(O)O (aq, 5000 H2O)O[N+](=O)[O-]-206.37± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091
7697-37-2*844
99.9 Nitric acidHON(O)O (aq, 3 H2O)O[N+](=O)[O-]-197.76± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091
7697-37-2*805
99.9 Nitric acidHON(O)O (aq, 1 H2O)O[N+](=O)[O-]-186.82± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091
7697-37-2*801
99.9 Nitrate[ON(O)O]- (aq)O=[N+]([O-])[O-]-206.55± 0.18kJ/mol62.00549 ±
0.00090
14797-55-8*800
99.9 Nitric acidHON(O)O (aq)O[N+](=O)[O-]-206.55± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091
7697-37-2*800
99.9 Nitric acidHON(O)O (aq, 5 H2O)O[N+](=O)[O-]-201.95± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091
7697-37-2*809

Most Influential reactions involving HON(O)O (aq, 2000 H2O)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
1.0002059.1 HON(O)O (aq, 1000 H2O) → HON(O)O (aq, 2000 H2O) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -0.071 ± 0.004 kJ/molNBS Tables 1989, NBS TN270, Parker 1965


References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.156 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   N. A. Seifert, B. Ruscic, R. Sivaramakrishnan, and K. Prozument,
The C2H4O Isomers in the Oxidation of Ethylene
J. Mol. Spectrosc. 398, 111847/1-8 (2023) [DOI: 10.1016/j.jms.2023.111847]
5   U. Jacovella, B. Ruscic, N. L. Chen, H.-L. Le, S. Boyé-Péronne, S. Hartweg, M. Roy-Chowdhury, G. A. Garcia, J.-C. Loison, and B. Gans,
Refining Thermochemical Properties of CF, SiF, and Their Cations by Combining Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Quantum Chemical Calculations, and the Active Thermochemical Tables Approach
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 30838-30847 (2023) [DOI: 10.1039/D3CP04244H]
6   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
7   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6] and Ruscic and Bross[7]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.