Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.156 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.148 to include species relevant to a recent study of the oxidation of ethylene [4] as well as new measurements that led to refining the thermochemistry of CF and SiF and their cations [5].

Vinyl chloride

Formula: CH2CHCl (g)

CAS RN: 75-01-4

ATcT ID: 75-01-4*0

SMILES: C=CCl

InChI: InChI=1S/C2H3Cl/c1-2-3/h2H,1H2

InChIKey: BZHJMEDXRYGGRV-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: C2H3Cl1

2D Image:

Aliases: CH2CHCl; Vinyl chloride; 1-Chloroethene; 1-Chloroethylene; Chloroethene; Chloroethylene; Monochloroethene; Monochloroethylene; F 1140; R 1140; VCM; Vinyl C monomer; Vinyl chloride monomer; H2C=CHCl

Relative Molecular Mass: 62.4979 ± 0.0018

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
29.39	21.80	± 0.27	kJ/mol

3D Image of CH2CHCl (g)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH2CHCl (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 72.7% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH2CHCl (g).
A total of 128 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
13.0	6083.9	CH2CHCl (g) → 2 C (g) + 3 H (g) + Cl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 2161.08 ± 0.70 kJ/mol	Harding 2007
12.3	6091.2	HCCH (g) + HCl (g) → CH2CHCl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -107.17 ± 0.70 kJ/mol	Harding 2007
11.7	6087.1	CH2CHCl (g) + H (g) → CH2CH2 (g) + Cl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -65.15 ± 0.70 kJ/mol	Harding 2007
11.7	6086.7	CH2CHCl (g) + H2 (g) → CH2CH2 (g) + HCl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -60.54 ± 0.70 kJ/mol	Harding 2007
4.2	6088.1	CH2CHCl (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → CH3CH2Cl (g) + CH2CH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.49 ± 0.25 kcal/mol	Karton 2017, Karton 2011, Karton 2007, Karton 2006
3.4	6139.1	HCCCl (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH2CHCl (g) + HCCH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -7.80 ± 0.25 kcal/mol	Karton 2017, Karton 2011, Karton 2007, Karton 2006
2.9	6083.8	CH2CHCl (g) → 2 C (g) + 3 H (g) + Cl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 516.46 ± 0.35 kcal/mol	Karton 2017
1.9	6089.1	CH2CHCl (g) → [CH2CH]+ (g) + Cl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 12.530 ± 0.010 eV	Shuman 2008
1.5	6092.2	CH3CHCl2 (g) → CH2CHCl (g) + HCl (g)	Δ_rG°(420.5 K) = 0.8 ± 0.7 kJ/mol	Levanova 1976, Manion 2002, 3rd Law
1.4	6104.4	CHClCHCl (g, cis) + CH2CH2 (g) → 2 CH2CHCl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.95 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
1.2	6104.1	CHClCHCl (g, cis) + CH2CH2 (g) → 2 CH2CHCl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.71 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
1.2	6104.2	CHClCHCl (g, cis) + CH2CH2 (g) → 2 CH2CHCl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.66 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
1.1	6094.1	CH2CHCl (cr,l) + 5/2 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + H2O (cr,l) + HCl (aq, 600 H2O)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -1241.1 ± 1.9 kJ/mol	Joshi 1964, Sinke 1958, Manion 2002
1.0	6095.1	CH3CHCl2 (cr,l) → CH2CHCl (g) + HCl (g)	Δ_rH°(308 K) = 93.24 ± 0.7 kJ/mol	Levanova 1976, Manion 2002, 2nd Law
1.0	6104.3	CHClCHCl (g, cis) + CH2CH2 (g) → 2 CH2CHCl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.64 ± 1.00 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.6	2359.1	2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g)	Δ_rG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/mol	Smith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
0.5	2512.1	CH2CH2 (g) + 3 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -1411.18 ± 0.30 kJ/mol	Rossini 1937
0.4	6089.3	CH2CHCl (g) → [CH2CH]+ (g) + Cl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 12.538 ± 0.02 eV	Sheng 1995
0.4	6084.6	CH2CHCl (g) + CH4 (g) → CH2CH2 (g) + CH3Cl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 5.39 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.4	6042.2	CH3CCl3 (l) + 2 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 3 HCl (aq, 600 H2O)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -264.83 ± 0.19 (×1.325) kcal/mol	Hu 1972

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of CH2CHCl (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
42.9	1,1-Dichloroethane	CH3CHCl2 (g)	-120.16	-132.94	± 0.43	kJ/mol	98.9586 ± 0.0024	75-34-3*0
41.7	1,1-Dichloroethane	CH3CHCl2 (cr,l)		-163.75	± 0.48	kJ/mol	98.9586 ± 0.0024	75-34-3*500
27.9	Ethylene	CH2CH2 (g)	60.91	52.40	± 0.11	kJ/mol	28.0532 ± 0.0016	74-85-1*0
27.9	Ethylene cation	[CH2CH2]+ (g)	1075.22	1068.01	± 0.11	kJ/mol	28.0526 ± 0.0016	34470-02-5*0
24.7	Vinylium	[CH2CH]+ (g)	1119.15	1115.70	± 0.55	kJ/mol	27.0447 ± 0.0016	14604-48-9*0
24.1	Vinyl bromide	CH2CHBr (g)	88.79	73.98	± 0.56	kJ/mol	106.9492 ± 0.0019	593-60-2*0
23.2	Vinyl chloride	CH2CHCl (cr,l)	-3.60	0.96	± 0.91	kJ/mol	62.4979 ± 0.0018	75-01-4*500
20.5	Carbon	C (g)	711.400	716.885	± 0.040	kJ/mol	12.01070 ± 0.00080	7440-44-0*0
20.5	Carbon	C (g, triplet)	711.400	716.885	± 0.040	kJ/mol	12.01070 ± 0.00080	7440-44-0*1
20.5	Carbon cation	C+ (g)	1797.853	1803.451	± 0.040	kJ/mol	12.01015 ± 0.00080	14067-05-1*0

Most Influential reactions involving CH2CHCl (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.786	6093.1	CH2CHCl (cr,l) → CH2CHCl (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 21.1 ± 1.0 kJ/mol	Manion 2002
0.385	6095.1	CH3CHCl2 (cr,l) → CH2CHCl (g) + HCl (g)	Δ_rH°(308 K) = 93.24 ± 0.7 kJ/mol	Levanova 1976, Manion 2002, 2nd Law
0.319	6089.1	CH2CHCl (g) → [CH2CH]+ (g) + Cl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 12.530 ± 0.010 eV	Shuman 2008
0.317	6092.2	CH3CHCl2 (g) → CH2CHCl (g) + HCl (g)	Δ_rG°(420.5 K) = 0.8 ± 0.7 kJ/mol	Levanova 1976, Manion 2002, 3rd Law
0.209	6139.1	HCCCl (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH2CHCl (g) + HCCH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -7.80 ± 0.25 kcal/mol	Karton 2017, Karton 2011, Karton 2007, Karton 2006
0.173	6099.5	(NN)CClCH3 (g) → CH2CHCl (g) + N2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -53.40 ± 1.50 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.173	8257.4	CH2CCHCl (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH2CCH2 (g) + CH2CHCl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -3.82 ± 0.9 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.160	6114.4	CHClCCl2 (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH2CHCl (g) + CH2CCl2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -3.23 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.152	6099.3	(NN)CClCH3 (g) → CH2CHCl (g) + N2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -52.84 ± 1.60 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.150	6091.2	HCCH (g) + HCl (g) → CH2CHCl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -107.17 ± 0.70 kJ/mol	Harding 2007
0.142	6114.2	CHClCCl2 (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH2CHCl (g) + CH2CCl2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -2.74 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.142	6114.1	CHClCCl2 (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH2CHCl (g) + CH2CCl2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -2.80 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.142	6083.9	CH2CHCl (g) → 2 C (g) + 3 H (g) + Cl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 2161.08 ± 0.70 kJ/mol	Harding 2007
0.140	8257.2	CH2CCHCl (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH2CCH2 (g) + CH2CHCl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -3.51 ± 1.0 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.138	6086.7	CH2CHCl (g) + H2 (g) → CH2CH2 (g) + HCl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -60.54 ± 0.70 kJ/mol	Harding 2007
0.138	6087.1	CH2CHCl (g) + H (g) → CH2CH2 (g) + Cl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -65.15 ± 0.70 kJ/mol	Harding 2007
0.131	6099.2	(NN)CClCH3 (g) → CH2CHCl (g) + N2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -53.19 ± 1.72 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.115	8257.1	CH2CCHCl (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH2CCH2 (g) + CH2CHCl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -3.60 ± 1.1 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.115	6114.3	CHClCCl2 (g) + CH2CH2 (g) → CH2CHCl (g) + CH2CCl2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -2.73 ± 1.00 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.103	6088.1	CH2CHCl (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → CH3CH2Cl (g) + CH2CH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.49 ± 0.25 kcal/mol	Karton 2017, Karton 2011, Karton 2007, Karton 2006

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.156 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4		N. A. Seifert, B. Ruscic, R. Sivaramakrishnan, and K. Prozument, The C2H4O Isomers in the Oxidation of Ethylene J. Mol. Spectrosc. 398, 111847/1-8 (2023) [DOI: 10.1016/j.jms.2023.111847]
5		U. Jacovella, B. Ruscic, N. L. Chen, H.-L. Le, S. Boyé-Péronne, S. Hartweg, M. Roy-Chowdhury, G. A. Garcia, J.-C. Loison, and B. Gans, Refining Thermochemical Properties of CF, SiF, and Their Cations by Combining Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Quantum Chemical Calculations, and the Active Thermochemical Tables Approach Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 30838-30847 (2023) [DOI: 10.1039/D3CP04244H]
6		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
7		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6] and Ruscic and Bross[7]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.