Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.148 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.140 to include species relevant to a recent study of the role of atmospheric methanediol[4].

Chlorine atom cation

Formula: Cl+ (g)

CAS RN: 24203-47-2

ATcT ID: 24203-47-2*0

SMILES: [Cl+]

InChI: InChI=1S/Cl/q+1

InChIKey: KVPIFZRDXDYGBA-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: Cl1+

2D Image:

Aliases: Cl+; Chlorine atom cation; Chlorine atom ion (1+); Chlorine cation; Chlorine ion (1+); Atomic chlorine cation; Atomic chlorine ion (1+); Monochlorine cation; Monochlorine ion (1+)

Relative Molecular Mass: 35.45215 ± 0.00090

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
1370.807	1372.603	± 0.0021	kJ/mol

3D Image of Cl+ (g)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of Cl+ (g)

The 5 contributors listed below account for 96.3% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of Cl+ (g).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
35.6	752.1	Cl (g) → Cl+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 104591.01 ± 0.14 cm-1	Yang 2015, est unc
24.4	741.7	Cl2 (g) → 2 Cl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 19999.12 ± 0.2 cm-1	Douglas 1975, est unc
17.4	752.5	Cl (g) → Cl+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 104590.9 ± 0.2 cm-1	Biemont 1999, note unc
10.8	741.6	Cl2 (g) → 2 Cl (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 19999.09 ± 0.3 cm-1	LeRoy 1971, note Cl2, LeRoy 1970d, LeRoy 1970b
7.7	752.2	Cl (g) → Cl+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 104591.0 ± 0.3 cm-1	Moore 1970, Radziemski 1969

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of Cl+ (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
60.3	Chlorine atom	Cl (g)	119.621	121.302	± 0.0011	kJ/mol	35.45270 ± 0.00090	22537-15-1*0
60.3	Chlorine atom	Cl (g, 2P3/2)	119.621	121.228	± 0.0011	kJ/mol	35.45270 ± 0.00090	22537-15-1*1
60.3	Chlorine atom	Cl (g, 2P1/2)	130.176	131.783	± 0.0011	kJ/mol	35.45270 ± 0.00090	22537-15-1*2
25.0	Chloroniumyl ion	[HCl]+ (g)	1137.798	1137.732	± 0.0051	kJ/mol	36.46009 ± 0.00090	12258-94-5*0
21.9	Chloride	Cl- (g)	-228.953	-227.346	± 0.0021	kJ/mol	35.45325 ± 0.00090	16887-00-6*0
13.4	Chlorine atom dication	[Cl]+2 (g)	3668.474	3670.081	± 0.013	kJ/mol	35.45160 ± 0.00090	15723-23-6*0
12.9	Hydrogen chloride	HCl (g)	-91.988	-92.172	± 0.0062	kJ/mol	36.46064 ± 0.00090	7647-01-0*0
4.8	Iodine monochloride	ICl (g)	19.024	17.391	± 0.013	kJ/mol	162.35717 ± 0.00090	7790-99-0*0
3.0	Hydrogen chloride	HCl (aq)		-166.989	± 0.023	kJ/mol	36.46064 ± 0.00090	7647-01-0*800
3.0	Chloride	Cl- (aq)		-166.989	± 0.023	kJ/mol	35.45325 ± 0.00090	16887-00-6*800

Most Influential reactions involving Cl+ (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.961	753.1	Cl+ (g) → [Cl]+2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 192070.0 ± 1.0 cm-1	NIST Atomic Web, Radziemski 1974
0.807	789.1	[HCl]+ (g) → H (g) + Cl+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 37537.0 ± 0.5 cm-1	Michel 2002, note HCl
0.574	752.1	Cl (g) → Cl+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 104591.01 ± 0.14 cm-1	Yang 2015, est unc
0.390	776.4	[Cl3]+ (g, singlet) → Cl+ (g) + Cl2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 75.4 ± 0.50 kcal/mol	Thanthiriwatte 2014
0.333	881.1	[ClF]+ (g) → Cl+ (g) + F (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 67.42 ± 0.2 kcal/mol	Vassilakis 2014, est unc
0.281	752.5	Cl (g) → Cl+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 104590.9 ± 0.2 cm-1	Biemont 1999, note unc
0.125	752.2	Cl (g) → Cl+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 104591.0 ± 0.3 cm-1	Moore 1970, Radziemski 1969
0.061	748.1	Cl2 (g) → Cl+ (g) + Cl- (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 95451.6 ± 1.1 cm-1	Mollet 2010
0.043	776.3	[Cl3]+ (g, singlet) → Cl+ (g) + Cl2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 75.14 ± 1.50 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.038	753.2	Cl+ (g) → [Cl]+2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 192070 ± 5 cm-1	Moore 1970, Edlen 1964, Kaufman 1969, est unc
0.038	776.1	[Cl3]+ (g, singlet) → Cl+ (g) + Cl2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 74.42 ± 1.60 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.020	776.2	[Cl3]+ (g, singlet) → Cl+ (g) + Cl2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 74.92 ± 2.16 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.008	2815.1	ClCN (g) → Cl+ (g) + CN (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 17.324 ± 0.049 eV	Dibeler 1967b, AE corr, est unc
0.008	789.2	[HCl]+ (g) → H (g) + Cl+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 37536.8 ± 5 cm-1	Michel 2001, note HCl
0.003	748.2	Cl2 (g) → Cl+ (g) + Cl- (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 95447 ± 5 cm-1	Li 2007
0.000	752.4	Cl (g) → Cl+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 104588 ± 10 cm-1	Huffman 1967
0.000	879.1	ClF (g) → Cl+ (g) + F- (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 12.13 ± 0.05 (×1.091) eV	Dibeler 1970a, est unc
0.000	753.4	Cl+ (g) → [Cl]+2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 23.788 ± 0.040 eV	Ruscic W1RO
0.000	790.1	HCl (g) → H (g) + Cl+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 17.37 ± 0.02 (×1.509) eV	Krauss 1968, AE corr, note unc3
0.000	753.3	Cl+ (g) → [Cl]+2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 23.775 ± 0.073 eV	Ruscic G4

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.148 of the Thermochemical Network (2023); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4		T. L. Nguyen, J. Peeters, J.-F. Müller, A. Perera, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton, Methanediol from Cloud-Processed Formaldehyde is Only a Minor Source of Atmospheric Formic Acid Natl. Acad. Sci. 120, e2304650120/1-8 (2023) [DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2304650120]
5		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.