Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[4] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.128 [5,6] to include with the calculations provided in reference [4].

Hydrogen atom

Formula: H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)

CAS RN: 12385-13-6

ATcT ID: 12385-13-6*1002001

SMILES: [H]

InChI: InChI=1S/H

InChIKey: YZCKVEUIGOORGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: H1

2D Image:

Aliases: H; Hydrogen atom; Protium; Hydrogen; Atomic hydrogen; Hydrogen radical; Monohydrogen; H-atom

Relative Molecular Mass: 1.007940 ± 0.000070

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
-18.9	-21.4	± 4.3	kJ/mol

3D Image of H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)

The 11 contributors listed below account for 90.2% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
31.7	9014.1	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.023 ± 0.070 eV	Yan 2018, note unc3
6.9	9014.6	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.03 ± 0.15 eV	Olsen 1999, est unc
6.9	9014.5	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.021 ± 0.15 eV	Badescu 2003, est unc
6.9	9014.4	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.08 ± 0.15 eV	Papoian 2000, est unc
6.9	9014.3	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.055 ± 0.150 eV	Hanh 2014, est unc
6.9	9014.2	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.029 ± 0.150 eV	Yan 2018, est unc
6.9	9014.7	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.04 ± 0.15 eV	Olsen 1999, est unc
4.6	8991.1	H2 (g) → 2 H (ad, Pt(111))	Δ_rH°(155 K) = -18.4 ± 0.6 kcal/mol	Poelsema 2010, note unc2
4.2	9017.1	H (ad, 4 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 4 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.095 ± 0.150 eV	Kallen 2001, est unc
3.9	9017.2	H (ad, 4 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 4 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 6.4 ± 15 kJ/mol	Watson 2001, est unc
3.9	9017.3	H (ad, 4 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 4 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 8.5 ± 15 kJ/mol	Hamada 2008, est unc

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
64.0	Hydrogen atom	H (ad, 4 Pt(111) atop)	-30.3	-32.7	± 5.3	kJ/mol	1.007940 ± 0.000070	12385-13-6*1002004
33.4	Hydrogen atom	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc)	-22.3	-25.6	± 1.5	kJ/mol	1.007940 ± 0.000070	12385-13-6*1001001
33.4	Hydrogen atom	H (ad, 1 Pt(111))	-22.3	-24.0	± 1.5	kJ/mol	1.007940 ± 0.000070	12385-13-6*1000001
25.8	Hydrogen atom	H (ad, 4 Pt(111))	-33.4	-35.1	± 1.5	kJ/mol	1.007940 ± 0.000070	12385-13-6*1000004
25.8	Hydrogen atom	H (ad, 4 Pt(111) fcc)	-33.4	-36.7	± 1.5	kJ/mol	1.007940 ± 0.000070	12385-13-6*1001004
24.7	Hydrogen atom	H (ad, Pt(111) fcc)	-37.0	-40.2	± 1.1	kJ/mol	1.007940 ± 0.000070	12385-13-6*1001000
24.7	Hydrogen atom	H (ad, Pt(111))	-37.0	-38.7	± 1.1	kJ/mol	1.007940 ± 0.000070	12385-13-6*1000000
11.5	Hydrogen atom	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) hcp)	-17.0	-20.2	± 5.2	kJ/mol	1.007940 ± 0.000070	12385-13-6*1003001
9.3	Hydrogen atom	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) bridge)	-14.1	-17.0	± 8.5	kJ/mol	1.007940 ± 0.000070	12385-13-6*1004001
2.1	Hydrogen atom	H (ad, 4 Pt(111) bridge)	-28.3	-31.1	± 7.6	kJ/mol	1.007940 ± 0.000070	12385-13-6*1004004

Most Influential reactions involving H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.665	9027.1	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop) + H (ad, 4 Pt(111) bridge) → H (ad, 4 Pt(111) atop) + H (ad, 1 Pt(111) bridge)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 2.9 ± 10 kJ/mol	Hamada 2008, est unc
0.542	9026.1	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop) + H (ad, 4 Pt(111) hcp) → H (ad, 4 Pt(111) atop) + H (ad, 1 Pt(111) hcp)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 1.2 ± 10 kJ/mol	Hamada 2008, est unc
0.357	9014.1	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.023 ± 0.070 eV	Yan 2018, note unc3
0.174	9025.1	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) + H (ad, 4 Pt(111) atop) → H (ad, 4 Pt(111) fcc) + H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.03 ± 0.10 eV	Olsen 1999, est unc
0.174	9025.2	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) + H (ad, 4 Pt(111) atop) → H (ad, 4 Pt(111) fcc) + H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.02 ± 0.10 eV	Olsen 1999, est unc
0.174	9025.3	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) + H (ad, 4 Pt(111) atop) → H (ad, 4 Pt(111) fcc) + H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.02 ± 0.10 eV	Olsen 1999, est unc
0.162	9025.4	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) + H (ad, 4 Pt(111) atop) → H (ad, 4 Pt(111) fcc) + H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.3 ± 10 kJ/mol	Hamada 2008, est unc
0.077	9014.6	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.03 ± 0.15 eV	Olsen 1999, est unc
0.077	9014.4	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.08 ± 0.15 eV	Papoian 2000, est unc
0.077	9014.5	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.021 ± 0.15 eV	Badescu 2003, est unc
0.077	9014.3	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.055 ± 0.150 eV	Hanh 2014, est unc
0.077	9014.7	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.04 ± 0.15 eV	Olsen 1999, est unc
0.077	9014.2	H (ad, 1 Pt(111) fcc) → H (ad, 1 Pt(111) atop)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.029 ± 0.150 eV	Yan 2018, est unc

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2023; available at ATcT.anl.gov [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1997229]
4		N. Genossar, P. B. Changala, B. Gans, J.-C. Loison, S. Hartweg, M.-A. Martin-Drumel, G. A. Garcia, J. F. Stanton, B. Ruscic, and J. H. Baraban Ring-Opening Dynamics of the Cyclopropyl Radical and Cation: the Transition State Nature of the Cyclopropyl Cation J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18518-18525 (2022) [DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c07740]
5		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects. Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021) [DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
6		J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton, Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021) [DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
7		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
8		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.