Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[4] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.128 [5,6] to include with the calculations provided in reference [4].

Aminomethylidyne

Formula: CNH2 (g)

CAS RN: 84654-89-7

ATcT ID: 84654-89-7*0

SMILES: [C]N

InChI: InChI=1S/CH2N/c1-2/h2H2

InChIKey: OGBYLFXCCAHRHC-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: C1H2N1

2D Image:

Aliases: Aminomethylidyne; CNH2; H2NC; NH2C; C-NH2; NH2-C; H2N-C

Relative Molecular Mass: 28.03332 ± 0.00082

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
371.9	368.4	± 1.1	kJ/mol

3D Image of CNH2 (g)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of CNH2 (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account for 90.7% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of CNH2 (g).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
26.0	2648.9	CNH2 (g) → C (g) + N (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 296.69 ± 0.50 kcal/mol	Puzzarini 2010, est unc
20.1	2652.9	CH2N (g) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 31.17 ± 0.50 kcal/mol	Puzzarini 2010, est unc
3.8	2653.8	HCNH (g, trans) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 7916 ± 420 cm-1	Ruscic W1RO
3.4	2652.8	CH2N (g) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10638 ± 420 cm-1	Ruscic W1RO
3.3	2653.4	HCNH (g, trans) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 7988 ± 450 cm-1	Ruscic G4
3.2	2653.7	HCNH (g, trans) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 8099 ± 455 cm-1	Ruscic CBS-n
3.0	2652.4	CH2N (g) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10821 ± 450 cm-1	Ruscic G4
2.9	2652.7	CH2N (g) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10798 ± 455 cm-1	Ruscic CBS-n
2.8	2648.8	CNH2 (g) → C (g) + N (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 297.28 ± 1.50 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
2.8	2653.3	HCNH (g, trans) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 8052 ± 490 cm-1	Ruscic G3X
2.5	2652.3	CH2N (g) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10879 ± 490 cm-1	Ruscic G3X
2.5	2648.7	CNH2 (g) → C (g) + N (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 296.42 ± 1.60 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
2.5	2648.4	CNH2 (g) → C (g) + N (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 297.59 ± 1.60 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
2.2	2648.3	CNH2 (g) → C (g) + N (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 297.32 ± 1.72 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
2.1	2653.6	HCNH (g, trans) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 8011 ± 560 cm-1	Ruscic CBS-n
1.9	2652.6	CH2N (g) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10942 ± 560 cm-1	Ruscic CBS-n
1.4	2649.8	CNH2 (g) → [CNH2]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 8.256 ± 0.040 eV	Ruscic W1RO
1.3	2648.6	CNH2 (g) → C (g) + N (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 296.49 ± 2.16 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
1.0	2623.11	CH2N (g) → C (g) + N (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 327.95 ± 0.30 kcal/mol	Karton 2008, Karton 2011
0.9	2651.8	[CNH2]+ (g) → C (g) + N (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 106.90 ± 1.50 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of CNH2 (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
33.8	Aminomethylidyne anion	[CNH2]- (g, triplet)	481.6	478.1	± 3.2	kJ/mol	28.03387 ± 0.00082	96808-04-7*1
27.7	Aminomethyliumylidene	[CNH2]+ (g)	1168.3	1165.1	± 2.2	kJ/mol	28.03277 ± 0.00082	86784-42-1*0
23.9	Methyleneamidogen	CH2N (g)	242.08	238.42	± 0.55	kJ/mol	28.03332 ± 0.00082	15845-29-1*0
15.5	(E)-Iminomethyl	HCNH (g, trans)	275.79	272.18	± 0.56	kJ/mol	28.03332 ± 0.00082	54980-10-8*0
15.5	Iminomethyl	HCNH (g)	275.79	272.19	± 0.56	kJ/mol	28.03332 ± 0.00082	15691-95-9*0
14.0	Methyleneamidogen anion	[CH2N]- (g)	192.84	189.09	± 0.88	kJ/mol	28.03387 ± 0.00082	28892-56-0*0
8.1	(Z)-Iminomethyl	HCNH (g, cis)	294.52	291.03	± 0.89	kJ/mol	28.03332 ± 0.00082	54980-11-9*0
5.9	Ethylideneamidogen	CH3CHN (g)	209.7	199.2	± 1.1	kJ/mol	42.0599 ± 0.0016	28445-33-2*0
3.9	1-Iminoethyl	CH3CNH (g, anti)	233.1	223.0	± 1.1	kJ/mol	42.0599 ± 0.0016	128365-64-0*2
3.9	1-Iminoethyl	CH3CNH (g)	233.1	223.0	± 1.1	kJ/mol	42.0599 ± 0.0016	128365-64-0*0

Most Influential reactions involving CNH2 (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.381	2650.5	[CNH2]- (g, triplet) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.116 ± 0.050 eV	Ruscic W1RO
0.305	2649.8	CNH2 (g) → [CNH2]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 8.256 ± 0.040 eV	Ruscic W1RO
0.265	2652.9	CH2N (g) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 31.17 ± 0.50 kcal/mol	Puzzarini 2010, est unc
0.261	2648.9	CNH2 (g) → C (g) + N (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 296.69 ± 0.50 kcal/mol	Puzzarini 2010, est unc
0.256	2650.2	[CNH2]- (g, triplet) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.135 ± 0.061 eV	Ruscic G4
0.132	2650.1	[CNH2]- (g, triplet) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.146 ± 0.085 eV	Ruscic G3X
0.117	2650.4	[CNH2]- (g, triplet) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.167 ± 0.090 eV	Ruscic CBS-n
0.112	2650.3	[CNH2]- (g, triplet) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.169 ± 0.092 eV	Ruscic CBS-n
0.091	2649.4	CNH2 (g) → [CNH2]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 8.272 ± 0.073 eV	Ruscic G4
0.086	2649.7	CNH2 (g) → [CNH2]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 8.252 ± 0.075 eV	Ruscic CBS-n
0.056	2649.3	CNH2 (g) → [CNH2]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 8.262 ± 0.093 eV	Ruscic G3X
0.050	2653.8	HCNH (g, trans) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 7916 ± 420 cm-1	Ruscic W1RO
0.049	2649.6	CNH2 (g) → [CNH2]+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 8.242 ± 0.099 eV	Ruscic CBS-n
0.046	2652.8	CH2N (g) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10638 ± 420 cm-1	Ruscic W1RO
0.043	2653.4	HCNH (g, trans) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 7988 ± 450 cm-1	Ruscic G4
0.042	2653.7	HCNH (g, trans) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 8099 ± 455 cm-1	Ruscic CBS-n
0.040	2652.4	CH2N (g) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10821 ± 450 cm-1	Ruscic G4
0.039	2652.7	CH2N (g) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10798 ± 455 cm-1	Ruscic CBS-n
0.036	2653.3	HCNH (g, trans) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 8052 ± 490 cm-1	Ruscic G3X
0.033	2652.3	CH2N (g) → CNH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10879 ± 490 cm-1	Ruscic G3X

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2023; available at ATcT.anl.gov [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1997229]
4		N. Genossar, P. B. Changala, B. Gans, J.-C. Loison, S. Hartweg, M.-A. Martin-Drumel, G. A. Garcia, J. F. Stanton, B. Ruscic, and J. H. Baraban Ring-Opening Dynamics of the Cyclopropyl Radical and Cation: the Transition State Nature of the Cyclopropyl Cation J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18518-18525 (2022) [DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c07740]
5		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects. Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021) [DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
6		J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton, Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021) [DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
7		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
8		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.