Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[4] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.128 [5,6] to include with the calculations provided in reference [4].

Carbonate

Formula: [OC(O)O]-2 (aq)

CAS RN: 3812-32-6

ATcT ID: 3812-32-6*800

SMILES: [O-]C(=O)[O-]

InChI: InChI=1S/CH2O3/c2-1(3)4/h(H2,2,3,4)/p-2

InChIKey: BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L

InChI: InChI=1S/CO3/c2-1(3)4/q-2

InChIKey: ZNHAHGQGZASUPF-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: C1O3-2

2D Image:

Aliases: [OC(O)O]-2; Carbonate; Carbonate dianion; Carbonate ion (2-); OC(O)O-2; [CO3]-2; CO3-2

Relative Molecular Mass: 60.0100 ± 0.0012

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
	-675.160	± 0.053	kJ/mol

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of [OC(O)O]-2 (aq)

The 17 contributors listed below account for 90.2% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of [OC(O)O]-2 (aq).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
36.0	3124.1	[HOC(O)O]- (aq) → [OC(O)O]-2 (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = 14.092 ± 0.010 kcal/mol	MacInnes 1933, Harned 1941, Berg 1978a, CODATA Key Vals
29.3	3122.1	CO2 (g) + H2O (cr,l) → [HOC(O)O]- (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = 10.666 ± 0.007 kcal/mol	Berg 1978a, CODATA Key Vals, Bates 1978
5.7	3124.3	[HOC(O)O]- (aq) → [OC(O)O]-2 (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 3.513 ± 0.025 kcal/mol	Berg 1978, Berg 1978a, CODATA Key Vals
4.6	121.2	1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/mol	Rossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
4.0	3124.5	[HOC(O)O]- (aq) → [OC(O)O]-2 (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = 14.090 ± 0.030 kcal/mol	Ryzhenko 1963, Berg 1978a, est unc
2.2	2279.1	2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g)	Δ_rG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/mol	Smith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
1.9	2134.7	C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -393.464 ± 0.024 kJ/mol	Hawtin 1966, note CO2e
1.7	2277.7	CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -890.578 ± 0.078 kJ/mol	Schley 2010
0.7	2134.4	C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -393.462 ± 0.038 kJ/mol	Lewis 1965, note CO2d
0.7	2134.5	C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -393.468 ± 0.038 kJ/mol	Fraser 1952, note CO2f
0.5	2134.11	C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -94.051 ± 0.011 kcal/mol	Prosen 1944a, Cox 1970, NBS TN270, NBS Tables 1989
0.4	3123.1	CO2 (g) + [OH]- (aq) → [HOC(O)O]- (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -15.870 ± 0.033 (×1.682) kcal/mol	Berg 1978, Berg 1978a, CODATA Key Vals
0.4	3124.2	[HOC(O)O]- (aq) → [OC(O)O]-2 (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 3.603 ± 0.050 (×1.795) kcal/mol	MacInnes 1933, Harned 1941, est unc
0.3	3124.7	[HOC(O)O]- (aq) → [OC(O)O]-2 (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = 58.96 ± 0.40 kJ/mol	NBS Tables 1989
0.3	3124.8	[HOC(O)O]- (aq) → [OC(O)O]-2 (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 14.85 ± 0.40 kJ/mol	NBS Tables 1989
0.3	3124.6	[HOC(O)O]- (aq) → [OC(O)O]-2 (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 3.500 ± 0.100 kcal/mol	Pitzer 1937
0.3	2134.6	C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -393.462 ± 0.056 kJ/mol	Hawtin 1966, note CO2e

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of [OC(O)O]-2 (aq)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
72.5	Hydrogen carbonate	[HOC(O)O]- (aq)		-689.862	± 0.039	kJ/mol	61.0174 ± 0.0012	71-52-3*800
43.5	Carbonic acid	C(O)(OH)2 (aq, undissoc)		-698.995	± 0.028	kJ/mol	62.0248 ± 0.0012	463-79-6*1000
39.4	Water	H2O (g, para)	-238.902	-241.805	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*2
39.4	Water	H2O (g)	-238.902	-241.805	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*0
39.4	Water	H2O (cr, l, eq.press.)	-286.274	-285.801	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*499
39.4	Water	H2O (l, eq.press.)		-285.801	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*589
39.4	Oxonium	[H3O]+ (aq)		-285.800	± 0.022	kJ/mol	19.02267 ± 0.00037	13968-08-6*800
39.4	Water	H2O (l)		-285.800	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*590
39.4	Water	H2O (cr,l)	-286.272	-285.800	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*500
39.4	Water	H2O (g, ortho)	-238.617	-241.805	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*1

Most Influential reactions involving [OC(O)O]-2 (aq)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.760	3124.1	[HOC(O)O]- (aq) → [OC(O)O]-2 (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = 14.092 ± 0.010 kcal/mol	MacInnes 1933, Harned 1941, Berg 1978a, CODATA Key Vals
0.121	3124.3	[HOC(O)O]- (aq) → [OC(O)O]-2 (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 3.513 ± 0.025 kcal/mol	Berg 1978, Berg 1978a, CODATA Key Vals
0.084	3124.5	[HOC(O)O]- (aq) → [OC(O)O]-2 (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = 14.090 ± 0.030 kcal/mol	Ryzhenko 1963, Berg 1978a, est unc
0.009	3124.2	[HOC(O)O]- (aq) → [OC(O)O]-2 (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 3.603 ± 0.050 (×1.795) kcal/mol	MacInnes 1933, Harned 1941, est unc
0.008	3124.8	[HOC(O)O]- (aq) → [OC(O)O]-2 (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 14.85 ± 0.40 kJ/mol	NBS Tables 1989
0.008	3124.7	[HOC(O)O]- (aq) → [OC(O)O]-2 (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = 58.96 ± 0.40 kJ/mol	NBS Tables 1989
0.007	3124.6	[HOC(O)O]- (aq) → [OC(O)O]-2 (aq) + H+ (aq)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 3.500 ± 0.100 kcal/mol	Pitzer 1937

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2023; available at ATcT.anl.gov [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1997229]
4		N. Genossar, P. B. Changala, B. Gans, J.-C. Loison, S. Hartweg, M.-A. Martin-Drumel, G. A. Garcia, J. F. Stanton, B. Ruscic, and J. H. Baraban Ring-Opening Dynamics of the Cyclopropyl Radical and Cation: the Transition State Nature of the Cyclopropyl Cation J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18518-18525 (2022) [DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c07740]
5		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects. Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021) [DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
6		J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton, Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021) [DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
7		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
8		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.