Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[4] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.128 [5,6] to include with the calculations provided in reference [4].

Cyclopentane

Formula: CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)

CAS RN: 287-92-3

ATcT ID: 287-92-3*0

SMILES: C1CCCC1

InChI: InChI=1S/C5H10/c1-2-4-5-3-1/h1-5H2

InChIKey: RGSFGYAAUTVSQA-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: C5H10

2D Image:

Aliases: CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2); Cyclopentane; cyc-C5H10; Pentamethylene; Exxsol HP 95; H&N; Marukazol FH; NSC 60213; Zeonsolv HP; UN 1146

Relative Molecular Mass: 70.1329 ± 0.0041

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
-43.70	-76.27	± 0.41	kJ/mol

3D Image of CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 74.9% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g).
A total of 71 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
25.5	3790.1	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 15/2 O2 (g) → 5 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -3290.85 ± 0.72 kJ/mol	Johnson 1946
21.9	3790.4	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 15/2 O2 (g) → 5 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -786.84 ± 0.14 (×1.325) kcal/mol	Kaarsemaker 1952, as quoted by Cox 1970
8.4	3790.3	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 15/2 O2 (g) → 5 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -786.61 ± 0.30 kcal/mol	Spitzer 1947
2.1	3800.1	CH2(CHCHCHCH) (g) + 2 H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(355.15 K) = -50.907 ± 0.200 kcal/mol	Kistiakowsky 1936
2.0	3795.2	CH2(CH2CHCHCH2) (l) + 7 O2 (g) → 5 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -744.54 ± 0.14 (×4.269) kcal/mol	Labbauf 1961
1.7	121.2	1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/mol	Rossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
1.5	3795.1	CH2(CH2CHCHCH2) (l) + 7 O2 (g) → 5 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -744.45 ± 0.17 (×4) kcal/mol	Prosen 1944c, Labbauf 1961, Epstein 1949
1.4	3797.6	CH2(CHCHCHCH) (g) → 5 C (g) + 6 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 1123.70 ± 0.50 kcal/mol	Karton 2017
0.9	2279.1	2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g)	Δ_rG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/mol	Smith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
0.9	6622.2	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2C (cr,l) + 21/2 O2 (g) → 7 CO2 (g) + 7 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -1099.09 ± 0.14 kcal/mol	Kaarsemaker 1952, as quoted by Cox 1970
0.9	3842.5	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 5.53 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.9	7943.5	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.30 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.8	3842.1	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 5.97 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.8	3842.2	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 5.96 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.8	3842.4	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 5.76 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.8	2134.7	C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -393.464 ± 0.024 kJ/mol	Hawtin 1966, note CO2e
0.8	7943.2	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.49 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.8	7943.4	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.45 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.8	7943.1	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.43 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.6	6621.5	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2C (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.69 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
99.3	Cyclopentane	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l)		-104.96	± 0.41	kJ/mol	70.1329 ± 0.0041	287-92-3*590
86.0	Cyclopentene	CH2(CH2CHCHCH2) (g)	59.58	35.32	± 0.46	kJ/mol	68.1170 ± 0.0040	142-29-0*0
76.8	Cyclopentene	CH2(CH2CHCHCH2) (l)		7.04	± 0.51	kJ/mol	68.1170 ± 0.0040	142-29-0*590
69.0	Cyclopentadiene	CH2(CHCHCHCH) (l)		110.06	± 0.58	kJ/mol	66.1011 ± 0.0040	542-92-7*590
47.3	Cyclopentadiene	CH2(CHCHCHCH) (g)	151.43	134.31	± 0.60	kJ/mol	66.1011 ± 0.0040	542-92-7*0
31.6	Norbornadiene	(CHCH)(CHCH2CH)(CHCH (g)	267.65	242.21	± 0.98	kJ/mol	92.1384 ± 0.0056	121-46-0*0
27.0	Carbonic acid	C(O)(OH)2 (aq, undissoc)		-698.995	± 0.028	kJ/mol	62.0248 ± 0.0012	463-79-6*1000
26.6	Norbornadiene	(CHCH)(CHCH2CH)(CHCH (l)		208.9	± 1.2	kJ/mol	92.1384 ± 0.0056	121-46-0*500
24.1	Water	H2O (l)		-285.800	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*590
24.1	Water	H2O (l, eq.press.)		-285.801	± 0.022	kJ/mol	18.01528 ± 0.00033	7732-18-5*589

Most Influential reactions involving CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.855	3792.1	CH2(CH2CHCHCH2) (g) + H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -26.67 ± 0.06 kcal/mol	Dolliver 1937
0.437	3789.1	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 28.72 ± 0.07 kJ/mol	Majer 1985
0.418	3800.1	CH2(CHCHCHCH) (g) + 2 H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(355.15 K) = -50.907 ± 0.200 kcal/mol	Kistiakowsky 1936
0.306	3789.3	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 6.86 ± 0.02 kcal/mol	Aston 1943, est unc
0.174	3789.2	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 6.83 ± 0.02 (×1.325) kcal/mol	McCullough 1959, note unc
0.076	3789.4	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = 6.86 ± 0.04 kcal/mol	Prosen 1946
0.041	3792.2	CH2(CH2CHCHCH2) (g) + H2 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -26.94 ± 0.13 (×2.089) kcal/mol	Allinger 1982
0.028	3802.5	CH2(CHCHCHCH) (g) + 2 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + 2 CH3CHCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 9.86 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.028	6621.5	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2C (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.69 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.025	3802.1	CH2(CHCHCHCH) (g) + 2 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + 2 CH3CHCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 9.40 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.025	3802.2	CH2(CHCHCHCH) (g) + 2 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + 2 CH3CHCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 9.50 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.025	3802.4	CH2(CHCHCHCH) (g) + 2 CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + 2 CH3CHCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.07 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.025	3803.5	CH2(CHCHCHCH) (g) + 2 CH3CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + 2 CH2CH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 15.37 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.025	6621.1	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2C (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.05 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.025	6621.2	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2C (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.03 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.025	6621.4	CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2C (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.22 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.023	7943.5	CH3CH(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH(CH3)3 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.30 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.022	3803.1	CH2(CHCHCHCH) (g) + 2 CH3CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + 2 CH2CH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 14.76 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.022	3803.4	CH2(CHCHCHCH) (g) + 2 CH3CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + 2 CH2CH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 15.76 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.022	3803.2	CH2(CHCHCHCH) (g) + 2 CH3CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2CH2) (g) + 2 CH2CH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 14.93 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2023; available at ATcT.anl.gov [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1997229]
4		N. Genossar, P. B. Changala, B. Gans, J.-C. Loison, S. Hartweg, M.-A. Martin-Drumel, G. A. Garcia, J. F. Stanton, B. Ruscic, and J. H. Baraban Ring-Opening Dynamics of the Cyclopropyl Radical and Cation: the Transition State Nature of the Cyclopropyl Cation J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18518-18525 (2022) [DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c07740]
5		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects. Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021) [DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
6		J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton, Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021) [DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
7		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
8		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.