Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network [3]This version of ATcT results[4] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.128 [5,6] to include with the calculations provided in reference [4].
|
Nitric acid |
Formula: HON(O)O (aq, 5000 H2O) |
CAS RN: 7697-37-2 |
ATcT ID: 7697-37-2*844 |
SMILES: O[N+](=O)[O-] |
InChI: InChI=1S/HNO3/c2-1(3)4/h(H,2,3,4) |
InChIKey: GRYLNZFGIOXLOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
SMILES: [H+].[N+](=O)([O-])[O-] |
InChI: InChI=1S/NO3/c2-1(3)4/q-1/p+1 |
InChIKey: NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-O |
Hills Formula: H1N1O3 |
2D Image: |
|
Aliases: HON(O)O; Nitric acid; Azotic acid; Fumic acid; Hydrogen nitrate; NSC 147791; NSC 15203; Nital; Nitryl hydroxide; Aqua fortis; UN 2032; HNO3; HONO2 |
Relative Molecular Mass: 63.01288 ± 0.00091 |
ΔfH°(0 K) | ΔfH°(298.15 K) | Uncertainty | Units |
---|
| -206.40 | ± 0.18 | kJ/mol |
|
Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of HON(O)O (aq, 5000 H2O)The 20 contributors listed below account only for 88.6% of the provenance of ΔfH° of HON(O)O (aq, 5000 H2O). A total of 24 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.
Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.
|
Contribution (%) | TN ID | Reaction | Measured Quantity | Reference | 40.1 | 1696.3 | (NH4)NO3 (cr,l) → N2 (g) + 1/2 O2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(293.65 K) = -49.44 ± 0.06 kcal/mol | Becker 1934 | 16.1 | 2005.1 | 2 ONO (g) + 1/2 O2 (g) + H2O (g) → 2 HON(O)O (g)  | ΔrG°(371 K) = -6.04 ± 0.63 kJ/mol | Jones 1943, 3rd Law | 6.3 | 2004.1 | 3 ONO (g) + H2O (g) → NO (g) + 2 HON(O)O (g)  | ΔrH°(293.1 K) = -8.95 ± 0.24 kcal/mol | Forsythe 1942, Chambers 1937, Wilson 1940, apud Gurvich TPIS | 5.8 | 2025.1 | HON(O)O (cr,l) → HON(O)O (g)  | ΔrH°(293.15 K) = 9.426 ± 0.030 kcal/mol | Wilson 1940, est unc | 4.6 | 2004.4 | 3 ONO (g) + H2O (g) → NO (g) + 2 HON(O)O (g)  | ΔrG°(298.15 K) = 10.33 ± 1.08 (×1.091) kJ/mol | Chambers 1937, 3rd Law | 2.3 | 2057.1 | 2 NO (g) + 3/2 O2 (g) + H2O (cr,l) → 2 HON(O)O (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -74.05 ± 0.5 kcal/mol | Forsythe 1942, est unc | 2.0 | 2025.4 | HON(O)O (cr,l) → HON(O)O (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 9.33 ± 0.05 kcal/mol | NBS Tables 1989, est unc | 1.6 | 2020.2 | [ON(O)O]- (g) + HBr (g) → Br- (g) + HON(O)O (g)  | ΔrH°(391 K) = -1.03 ± 0.21 kcal/mol | Davidson 1977, 2nd Law | 1.4 | 2004.2 | 3 ONO (g) + H2O (g) → NO (g) + 2 HON(O)O (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -9.184 ± 0.5 kcal/mol | Forsythe 1942, est unc | 1.4 | 2004.3 | 3 ONO (g) + H2O (g) → NO (g) + 2 HON(O)O (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -9.124 ± 0.5 kcal/mol | Forsythe 1942, Chambers 1937, est unc | 1.1 | 1459.1 | NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 52400 ± 10 cm-1 | Callear 1970 | 1.1 | 1459.2 | NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 52400 ± 10 cm-1 | Dingle 1975 | 0.6 | 1697.1 | NH3 (g) → NH3 (aq, undissoc)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -8.448 ± 0.015 kcal/mol | Vanderzee 1972 | 0.6 | 1459.4 | NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 52408 ± 10 (×1.325) cm-1 | Kley 1973, Miescher 1974, est unc | 0.5 | 2020.1 | [ON(O)O]- (g) + HBr (g) → Br- (g) + HON(O)O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.045 ± 0.015 eV | Ferguson 1972b | 0.5 | 121.2 | 1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/mol | Rossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930 | 0.5 | 2025.3 | HON(O)O (cr,l) → HON(O)O (g)  | ΔrH°(293.15 K) = 9.350 ± 0.100 kcal/mol | Forsythe 1942, Wilson 1940 | 0.5 | 2025.2 | HON(O)O (cr,l) → HON(O)O (g)  | ΔrH°(293.15 K) = 9.450 ± 0.100 kcal/mol | Wilson 1940, Forsythe 1942 | 0.4 | 1705.2 | (NH4)NO3 (cr,l) → [NH4]+ (aq) + [ON(O)O]- (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 25.544 ± 0.030 kJ/mol | Vanderzee 1980, Vanderzee 1980a, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals | 0.4 | 1614.6 | O2NONO2 (g) + H2O (g) → 2 HON(O)O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -8.68 ± 0.9 kcal/mol | Ruscic W1RO |
|
Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of HON(O)O (aq, 5000 H2O) |
Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances. The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.
|
Correlation Coefficent (%) | Species Name | Formula | Image | ΔfH°(0 K) | ΔfH°(298.15 K) | Uncertainty | Units | Relative Molecular Mass | ATcT ID | 99.9 | Nitric acid | HON(O)O (aq, 1000 H2O) | | | -206.25 | ± 0.18 | kJ/mol | 63.01288 ± 0.00091 | 7697-37-2*839 | 99.9 | Nitric acid | HON(O)O (aq, 25 H2O) | | | -206.03 | ± 0.18 | kJ/mol | 63.01288 ± 0.00091 | 7697-37-2*819 | 99.9 | Nitric acid | HON(O)O (aq, 7 H2O) | | | -203.81 | ± 0.18 | kJ/mol | 63.01288 ± 0.00091 | 7697-37-2*812 | 99.9 | Nitric acid | HON(O)O (aq, 2000 H2O) | | | -206.32 | ± 0.18 | kJ/mol | 63.01288 ± 0.00091 | 7697-37-2*841 | 99.9 | Nitric acid | HON(O)O (aq, 50 H2O) | | | -206.07 | ± 0.18 | kJ/mol | 63.01288 ± 0.00091 | 7697-37-2*822 | 99.9 | Nitric acid | HON(O)O (aq, 3 H2O) | | | -197.78 | ± 0.18 | kJ/mol | 63.01288 ± 0.00091 | 7697-37-2*805 | 99.9 | Nitric acid | HON(O)O (aq, 1 H2O) | | | -186.84 | ± 0.18 | kJ/mol | 63.01288 ± 0.00091 | 7697-37-2*801 | 99.9 | Nitrate | [ON(O)O]- (aq) | | | -206.57 | ± 0.18 | kJ/mol | 62.00549 ± 0.00090 | 14797-55-8*800 | 99.9 | Nitric acid | HON(O)O (aq) | | | -206.57 | ± 0.18 | kJ/mol | 63.01288 ± 0.00091 | 7697-37-2*800 | 99.9 | Nitric acid | HON(O)O (aq, 100 H2O) | | | -206.07 | ± 0.18 | kJ/mol | 63.01288 ± 0.00091 | 7697-37-2*828 |
|
Most Influential reactions involving HON(O)O (aq, 5000 H2O)Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.
|
|
|
References
|
1
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004)
[DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
|
2
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005)
[DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
|
3
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2023; available at ATcT.anl.gov [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1997229]
|
4
|
|
N. Genossar, P. B. Changala, B. Gans, J.-C. Loison, S. Hartweg, M.-A. Martin-Drumel, G. A. Garcia, J. F. Stanton, B. Ruscic, and J. H. Baraban
Ring-Opening Dynamics of the Cyclopropyl Radical and Cation: the Transition State Nature of the Cyclopropyl Cation
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18518-18525 (2022)
[DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c07740]
|
5
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross
Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects.
Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021)
[DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
|
6
|
|
J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton,
Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions
J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021)
[DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
|
7
|
|
B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014)
[DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
|
8
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019)
[DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]
|
|
|
Formula
|
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
|
|
Uncertainties
|
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
|
|
Website Functionality Credits
|
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
|
|
Acknowledgement
|
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.
|