Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[4] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.128 [5,6] to include with the calculations provided in reference [4].

Nitrous acid

Formula: HONO (g, trans)

CAS RN: 7782-77-6

ATcT ID: 7782-77-6*1

SMILES: N(=O)O

InChI: InChI=1S/HNO2/c2-1-3/h(H,2,3)

InChIKey: IOVCWXUNBOPUCH-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: H1N1O2

2D Image:

Aliases: HONO; Nitrous acid; Nytrosyl hydroxide; ONOH; HO-N=O; O=N-OH

Relative Molecular Mass: 47.01348 ± 0.00061

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
-72.971	-79.114	± 0.079	kJ/mol

3D Image of HONO (g, trans)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of HONO (g, trans)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 81.1% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of HONO (g, trans).
A total of 49 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
20.0	1970.8	NO (g) + ONO (g) + H2O (g) → 2 HONO (g)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = -1.44 ± 0.10 kJ/mol	Vosper 1976, 3rd Law
16.4	1459.2	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 52400 ± 10 cm-1	Dingle 1975
16.4	1459.1	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 52400 ± 10 cm-1	Callear 1970
9.3	1459.4	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 52408 ± 10 (×1.325) cm-1	Kley 1973, Miescher 1974, est unc
3.2	1970.2	NO (g) + ONO (g) + H2O (g) → 2 HONO (g)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = -1.25 ± 0.25 kJ/mol	Wayne 1951, 3rd Law
2.5	1459.3	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 52420 ± 12 (×2.134) cm-1	Miescher 1974, Huber 1979
1.8	1971.3	ONN(O)O (g) + H2O (g) → 2 HONO (g)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = -3.26 ± 0.15 (×2.089) kJ/mol	Vosper 1976, 3rd Law
1.7	1412.3	N2 (g) → N+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 24.2880 ± 0.0009 eV	Tang 2005
1.4	1412.1	N2 (g) → N+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 24.2888 ± 0.0010 eV	Tang 2005
1.4	1412.2	N2 (g) → N+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 24.2883 ± 0.0010 eV	Tang 2005
1.1	1696.3	(NH4)NO3 (cr,l) → N2 (g) + 1/2 O2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(293.65 K) = -49.44 ± 0.06 kcal/mol	Becker 1934
0.7	121.2	1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/mol	Rossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
0.7	1462.4	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 626.47 ± 0.56 kJ/mol	Harding 2008
0.6	1973.1	HONO (g, trans) → OH (g) + NO (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 16772 ± 14 (×1.509) cm-1	Reiche 2000, Reiche 2002, Dieke 1962
0.5	1391.11	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 941.14 ± 0.15 kJ/mol	Thorpe 2021
0.5	1461.10	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 149.82 ± 0.15 kcal/mol	Karton 2007a, Karton 2008
0.5	1459.6	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 6.503 ± 0.004 (×1.719) eV	Brewer 1956, Frisch 1965
0.5	1460.10	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 149.78 ± 0.16 kcal/mol	Feller 2014
0.5	1923.4	HNO (g) → H (g) + N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 823.10 ± 0.56 kJ/mol	Harding 2008
0.4	1462.2	NO (g) → N (g) + O (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 626.74 ± 0.70 kJ/mol	Harding 2008

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of HONO (g, trans)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
100.0	Nitrous acid	HONO (g)	-72.971	-78.627	± 0.079	kJ/mol	47.01348 ± 0.00061	7782-77-6*0
83.1	Nitrogen dioxide	ONO (g)	36.878	34.071	± 0.066	kJ/mol	46.00554 ± 0.00060	10102-44-0*0
83.1	Nitric oxide	NO (g)	90.639	91.143	± 0.066	kJ/mol	30.00614 ± 0.00031	10102-43-9*0
83.0	Nitrosyl ion	[NO]+ (g)	984.507	984.502	± 0.066	kJ/mol	30.00559 ± 0.00031	14452-93-8*0
80.9	Dinitrogen tetraoxide	O2NNO2 (g)	20.19	10.90	± 0.14	kJ/mol	92.0111 ± 0.0012	10544-72-6*0
80.3	Nitrosyl chloride	ClNO (g)	54.473	52.572	± 0.068	kJ/mol	65.45884 ± 0.00095	2696-92-6*0
78.5	Dioxohydrazine	ONNO (g, cis)	172.93	171.17	± 0.14	kJ/mol	60.01228 ± 0.00062	16824-89-8*2
78.5	Dioxohydrazine	ONNO (g)	172.93	171.17	± 0.14	kJ/mol	60.01228 ± 0.00062	16824-89-8*0
76.2	Nitrogen sesquioxide	ONN(O)O (g)	90.76	86.19	± 0.15	kJ/mol	76.01168 ± 0.00091	10544-73-7*0
59.1	Dinitrogen tetraoxide	O2NNO2 (cr,l)	-37.82	-26.97	± 0.19	kJ/mol	92.0111 ± 0.0012	10544-72-6*500

Most Influential reactions involving HONO (g, trans)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
1.000	1963.1	HONO (g, trans) → HONO (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0 ± 0 cm-1	Sironneau 2010, Ruscic G3B3
0.405	2073.6	HOONO (g, trans, perp) + H2O (g) → HONO (g, trans) + HOOH (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 6.93 ± 0.15 kcal/mol	McGrath 2005
0.383	1980.6	HN(O)O (g) → HONO (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -36.61 ± 1.5 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
0.347	1954.1	HONO (g, trans) → [HONO]+ (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.97 ± 0.03 eV	Taatjes 2004
0.338	1964.1	HONO (g, trans) → HONO (g, cis)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 141 ± 35 cm-1	Varma 1976
0.218	1986.5	HOON (g, trans) → HONO (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -177.0 ± 5 kJ/mol	Talipov 2013, est unc
0.195	1954.9	HONO (g, trans) → [HONO]+ (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 10.959 ± 0.040 eV	Ruscic W1RO
0.184	1986.2	HOON (g, trans) → HONO (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -41.47 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.165	1964.2	HONO (g, trans) → HONO (g, cis)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 100 ± 50 cm-1	Sironneau 2010, est unc
0.159	1986.1	HOON (g, trans) → HONO (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -41.73 ± 1.4 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.150	1965.12	HONO (g, trans) → HONO (g, cis)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.30 ± 0.15 kcal/mol	Feller 2012, est unc
0.138	1956.8	[HONO]- (g, trans) → HONO (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.300 ± 0.050 eV	Ruscic W1RO
0.133	1995.5	HN(OO) (g) → HONO (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -83.55 ± 1.2 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.122	1991.5	HNOO (g, cis) → HONO (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -75.48 ± 1.2 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.113	1995.2	HN(OO) (g) → HONO (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -83.50 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.113	1995.4	HN(OO) (g) → HONO (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -83.69 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.104	1991.4	HNOO (g, cis) → HONO (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -74.20 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.104	1991.2	HNOO (g, cis) → HONO (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -74.99 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.098	1995.1	HN(OO) (g) → HONO (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -84.40 ± 1.4 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.090	1991.1	HNOO (g, cis) → HONO (g, trans)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -75.15 ± 1.4 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2023; available at ATcT.anl.gov [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1997229]
4		N. Genossar, P. B. Changala, B. Gans, J.-C. Loison, S. Hartweg, M.-A. Martin-Drumel, G. A. Garcia, J. F. Stanton, B. Ruscic, and J. H. Baraban Ring-Opening Dynamics of the Cyclopropyl Radical and Cation: the Transition State Nature of the Cyclopropyl Cation J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18518-18525 (2022) [DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c07740]
5		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects. Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021) [DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
6		J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton, Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021) [DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
7		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
8		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.