Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[4] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.128 [5,6] to include with the calculations provided in reference [4].

Krypton cation

Formula: Kr+ (g)

CAS RN: 16915-28-9

ATcT ID: 16915-28-9*0

SMILES: [Kr+]

InChI: InChI=1S/Kr/q+1

InChIKey: CRBLVWQHDVTIJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: Kr1+

2D Image:

Aliases: Kr+; Krypton cation; Krypton ion (1+); Krypton atom cation; Krypton atom ion (1+); Atomic krypton cation; Atomic krypton ion (1+)

Relative Molecular Mass: 83.7995 ± 0.1000

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
1350.757	1350.756	± 0.000	kJ/mol

3D Image of Kr+ (g)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of Kr+ (g)

The 4 contributors listed below account for 98.0% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of Kr+ (g).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
44.3	8676.1	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 112914.433 ± 0.016 cm-1	Saloman 2007
28.4	8676.2	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 112914.422 ± 0.020 cm-1	Bounakhla 1993, Hollenstein 2003, Brandi 2002
12.6	8676.4	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 112914.414 ± 0.030 cm-1	Delsart 1981, Hollenstein 2003, Brandi 2002
12.6	8676.3	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 112914.412 ± 0.030 cm-1	Sugar 1991, Hollenstein 2003, Brandi 2002

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of Kr+ (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Image	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
1.0	Krypton dication	[Kr]+2 (g)		3701.124	3701.124	± 0.013	kJ/mol	83.7989 ± 0.1000	18469-91-5*0

Most Influential reactions involving Kr+ (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
1.000	8677.1	Kr+ (g) → [Kr]+2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 196475.4 ± 1.0 cm-1	Sugar 1991, Minnhagen 1969
0.444	8676.1	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 112914.433 ± 0.016 cm-1	Saloman 2007
0.284	8676.2	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 112914.422 ± 0.020 cm-1	Bounakhla 1993, Hollenstein 2003, Brandi 2002
0.126	8676.4	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 112914.414 ± 0.030 cm-1	Delsart 1981, Hollenstein 2003, Brandi 2002
0.126	8676.3	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 112914.412 ± 0.030 cm-1	Sugar 1991, Hollenstein 2003, Brandi 2002
0.015	8676.5	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 112914.512 ± 0.030 (×2.89) cm-1	Yoon 1994, Hollenstein 2003, Brandi 2002
0.004	6167.1	CF4 (g) + Kr+ (g) → [CF3]+ (g) + F (g) + Kr (g)	Δ_rG°(300 K) = 0.24 ± 0.07 eV	Fisher 1990a
0.003	8676.6	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 112914.6 ± 0.1 (×1.756) cm-1	Yoshino 1979
0.000	8676.7	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 112914.5 ± 0.5 cm-1	Moore 1970, NSRDS-NBS 35, Petersson 1964, est unc
0.000	8676.8	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 112925 ± 10 (×1.067) cm-1	Chaghtai 1973
0.000	8676.11	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 14.000 ± 0.002 eV	Kimura 1981, est unc
0.000	8676.10	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 13.999 ± 0.002 eV	Nicholson 1965
0.000	8676.14	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 14.01 ± 0.01 (×1.044) eV	Marquette 1985
0.000	8676.13	Kr (g) → Kr+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 14.05 ± 0.06 eV	Al-Joboury 1963, est unc

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2023; available at ATcT.anl.gov [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1997229]
4		N. Genossar, P. B. Changala, B. Gans, J.-C. Loison, S. Hartweg, M.-A. Martin-Drumel, G. A. Garcia, J. F. Stanton, B. Ruscic, and J. H. Baraban Ring-Opening Dynamics of the Cyclopropyl Radical and Cation: the Transition State Nature of the Cyclopropyl Cation J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18518-18525 (2022) [DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c07740]
5		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects. Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021) [DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
6		J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton, Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021) [DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
7		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
8		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.