Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122r of the Thermochemical Network [3] This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122q [4, 5] to include a non-rigid rotor anharmonic oscillator (NRRAO) partition function for hydroxymethyl [6], as well as data on 42 additional species, some of which are related to soot formation mechanisms.
|
Species Name |
Formula |
Image |
ΔfH°(0 K) |
ΔfH°(298.15 K) |
Uncertainty |
Units |
Relative Molecular Mass |
ATcT ID |
Oxygen atom anion | O- (g) | ![[O-]](../images/127.png) | 105.868 | 108.097 | ± 0.0021 | kJ/mol | 15.99995 ± 0.00030 | 14337-01-0*0 |
|
Representative Geometry of O- (g) |
|
spin ON spin OFF |
|
Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of O- (g)The 9 contributors listed below account for 98.7% of the provenance of ΔfH° of O- (g).
Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.
|
Contribution (%) | TN ID | Reaction | Measured Quantity | Reference | 47.7 | 1.4 | O2 (g) → 2 O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 41269.2 ± 0.5 cm-1 | Lewis 1985, note O2b | 24.0 | 22.2 | O2 (g) → O+ (g) + O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 139321.2 ± 0.7 cm-1 | Martin 1997, note O2c | 14.7 | 1.5 | O2 (g) → 2 O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 41269.6 ± 0.9 cm-1 | Gibson 1991, note O2b | 9.8 | 1.6 | O2 (g) → 2 O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 41268.6 ± 1.1 cm-1 | Cosby 1992, note O2b | 1.3 | 1.3 | O2 (g) → 2 O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 41268.2 ± 3 cm-1 | Brix 1954, Lewis 1985, note O2a | 0.3 | 21.6 | O2 (g) → O+ (g) + O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 151100.4 ± 2.6 (×2.229) cm-1 | note O2+f, Kong 1996, Cosby 1980, Pernot 1979 | 0.3 | 21.4 | O2 (g) → O+ (g) + O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 151111 ± 6 cm-1 | Cosby 1992, note O2+e, Yoshino 1968, Cosby 1980, Pernot 1979 | 0.1 | 15.1 | O (g) → O+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 109837.02 ± 0.06 cm-1 | Eriksson 1968, Moore 1970, NIST Atomic Web | 0.1 | 1.2 | O2 (g) → 2 O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 41260.7 ± 5 (×1.682) cm-1 | Brix 1954, Brix 1953, note O2 |
|
Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of O- (g) |
Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances. The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.
|
Correlation Coefficent (%) | Species Name | Formula | Image | ΔfH°(0 K) | ΔfH°(298.15 K) | Uncertainty | Units | Relative Molecular Mass | ATcT ID | 99.9 | Oxygen atom | O (g) | ![[O]](../images/18.png) | 246.844 | 249.229 | ± 0.0021 | kJ/mol | 15.99940 ± 0.00030 | 17778-80-2*0 | 99.9 | Oxygen atom | O (g, triplet) | ![[O]](../images/564.png) | 246.844 | 249.229 | ± 0.0021 | kJ/mol | 15.99940 ± 0.00030 | 17778-80-2*1 | 99.9 | Oxygen atom | O (g, singlet) | ![[O]](../images/513.png) | 436.666 | 438.523 | ± 0.0021 | kJ/mol | 15.99940 ± 0.00030 | 17778-80-2*2 | 94.3 | Oxygen atom cation | O+ (g) | ![[O+]](../images/151.png) | 1560.786 | 1562.644 | ± 0.0021 | kJ/mol | 15.99885 ± 0.00030 | 14581-93-2*0 | 16.7 | Oxygen atom dication | [O]+2 (g) | ![[O++]](../images/1586.png) | 4949.459 | 4953.000 | ± 0.013 | kJ/mol | 15.99830 ± 0.00030 | 14127-63-0*0 | 11.9 | Oxygen atom trication | [O]+3 (g) | ![[O+3]](../images/1609.png) | 10249.929 | 10252.880 | ± 0.018 | kJ/mol | 15.99775 ± 0.00030 | 14127-64-1*0 | 8.4 | Oxygen atom tetracation | [O]+4 (g) | ![[O+4]](../images/1513.png) | 17719.207 | 17721.064 | ± 0.025 | kJ/mol | 15.99721 ± 0.00030 | 14127-65-2*0 | 5.9 | Nitrogen dioxide | ONO (g) | ![O=[N]=O](../images/50.png) | 36.871 | 34.064 | ± 0.066 | kJ/mol | 46.00554 ± 0.00060 | 10102-44-0*0 | 5.9 | Chlorooxidanyl | ClO (g) |  | 101.124 | 101.716 | ± 0.035 | kJ/mol | 51.45210 ± 0.00095 | 14989-30-1*0 | 5.7 | Dinitrogen tetraoxide | O2NNO2 (g) |  | 20.18 | 10.89 | ± 0.14 | kJ/mol | 92.0111 ± 0.0012 | 10544-72-6*0 |
|
Most Influential reactions involving O- (g)Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.
|
Influence Coefficient | TN ID | Reaction | Measured Quantity | Reference | 0.474 | 16.4 | O- (g) → O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 11784.675 ± 0.006 cm-1 | Hotop 1999, Blondel 2005, Neumark 1985, Blondel 1995 | 0.368 | 32.4 | [O]-2 (g) → O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -5.660 ± 0.25 eV | Ruscic G4, est unc | 0.348 | 16.1 | O- (g) → O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 11784.676 ± 0.007 cm-1 | Blondel 2005, Chaibi 2010 | 0.247 | 22.2 | O2 (g) → O+ (g) + O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 139321.2 ± 0.7 cm-1 | Martin 1997, note O2c | 0.177 | 32.6 | [O]-2 (g) → O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -5.421 ± 0.36 eV | Ruscic CBS-n, est unc | 0.162 | 1288.1 | [O(NN)]- (g) → N2 (g) + O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 16 ± 7 kJ/mol | Kryachko 2001, est unc | 0.144 | 32.7 | [O]-2 (g) → O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -6.043 ± 0.20 (×2) eV | Ruscic W1RO, est unc | 0.092 | 32.2 | [O]-2 (g) → O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -5.31 ± 0.5 eV | Edlen 1960, Herrick 1975 | 0.092 | 32.8 | [O]-2 (g) → O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -5.65 ± 0.5 eV | Sommerfeld 2000, est unc | 0.092 | 32.1 | [O]-2 (g) → O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -5.38 ± 0.5 eV | Herrick 1975 | 0.085 | 1277.4 | [NNO]- (g) → N2 (g) + O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.76 ± 1.50 kcal/mol | Ruscic W1RO | 0.079 | 1288.2 | [O(NN)]- (g) → N2 (g) + O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 16 ± 10 kJ/mol | Kryachko 2001, est unc | 0.079 | 1288.3 | [O(NN)]- (g) → N2 (g) + O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 16 ± 10 kJ/mol | Kryachko 2001, est unc | 0.075 | 1277.2 | [NNO]- (g) → N2 (g) + O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.29 ± 1.60 kcal/mol | Ruscic G4 | 0.066 | 16.6 | O- (g) → O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 11784.680 ± 0.016 cm-1 | Blondel 2001a, Valli 1999 | 0.054 | 251.5 | [(HOH)O]- (g) → H2O (g) + O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 25.66 ± 3.00 kcal/mol | Ruscic W1RO | 0.047 | 251.4 | [(HOH)O]- (g) → H2O (g) + O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 24.68 ± 3.20 kcal/mol | Ruscic CBS-n | 0.047 | 251.2 | [(HOH)O]- (g) → H2O (g) + O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 26.77 ± 3.20 kcal/mol | Ruscic G4 | 0.042 | 16.5 | O- (g) → O (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 11784.682 ± 0.020 cm-1 | Valli 1999 | 0.041 | 251.1 | [(HOH)O]- (g) → H2O (g) + O- (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 28.33 ± 3.44 kcal/mol | Ruscic G3X |
|
|
References
|
1
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004)
[DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
|
2
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005)
[DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
|
3
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122r of the Thermochemical Network, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2021 [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1822363]; available at ATcT.anl.gov
|
4
|
|
D. Feller, D. H. Bross, and B. Ruscic,
Enthalpy of Formation of C2H2O4 (Oxalic Acid) from High-Level Calculations and the Active Thermochemical Tables Approach.
J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 3481-3496 (2019)
[DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b12329]
|
5
|
|
B. K. Welch, R. Dawes, D. H. Bross, and B. Ruscic,
An Automated Thermochemistry Protocol Based on Explicitly Correlated Coupled-Cluster Theory: The Methyl and Ethyl Peroxy Families.
J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 5673-5682 (2019)
[DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b12329]
|
6
|
|
D. H. Bross, H.-G. Yu, L. B. Harding, and B. Ruscic,
Active Thermochemical Tables: The Partition Function of Hydroxymethyl (CH2OH) Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 4212-4231 (2019)
[DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b02295]
|
7
|
|
B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014)
[DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
|
|