Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122p of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122o [4] to include an updated enthalpy of formation for Hydrazine. [5].

Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
Carbon dioxide cation[CO2]+ (g)[C+](=O)=O936.093936.927± 0.017kJ/mol44.00895 ±
0.00100		12181-61-2*0

Representative Geometry of [CO2]+ (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of [CO2]+ (g)

The 9 contributors listed below account for 90.2% of the provenance of ΔfH° of [CO2]+ (g).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)		TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
26.11764.7 C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.464 ± 0.024 kJ/molHawtin 1966, note CO2e
20.31770.1 CO2 (g) → [CO2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 111112.3 ± 0.8 cm-1Rupper 2004
10.41764.5 C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.468 ± 0.038 kJ/molFraser 1952, note CO2f
10.41764.4 C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.462 ± 0.038 kJ/molLewis 1965, note CO2d
7.11764.9 C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -94.051 ± 0.011 kcal/molProsen 1944a, Cox 1970, NBS TN270, NBS Tables 1989
4.81764.6 C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.462 ± 0.056 kJ/molHawtin 1966, note CO2e
3.91764.2 C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.498 ± 0.062 kJ/molDewey 1938, note CO2, Rossini 1938, note CO2c
3.61764.3 C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(303.15 K) = -393.447 ± 0.064 kJ/molJessup 1938, note CO2a, Rossini 1938, note CO2c
3.21770.7 CO2 (g) → [CO2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 111113.2 ± 2 cm-1Wiedmann 1995

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of [CO2]+ (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation
Coefficent
(%)		Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
86.0 Carbon dioxideCO2 (g)C(=O)=O-393.108-393.474± 0.015kJ/mol44.00950 ±
0.00100		124-38-9*0
36.7 Succinic acid(CH2C(O)OH)2 (cr,l)OC(=O)CCC(=O)O-918.55-940.28± 0.13kJ/mol118.0880 ±
0.0034		110-15-6*500
30.6 BenzeneC6H6 (cr,l)c1ccccc150.7149.16± 0.23kJ/mol78.1118 ±
0.0048		71-43-2*500
30.5 BenzeneC6H6 (g)c1ccccc1100.6183.10± 0.23kJ/mol78.1118 ±
0.0048		71-43-2*0
30.5 Benzene cation[C6H6]+ (g)c1ccc(cc1)[H+]992.50976.03± 0.23kJ/mol78.1113 ±
0.0048		34504-50-2*0
30.5 Carbon monoxideCO (g, triplet)[C-]#[O+]465.579469.286± 0.026kJ/mol28.01010 ±
0.00085		630-08-0*1
30.5 Carbon monoxideCO (g, singlet)[C-]#[O+]-113.803-110.523± 0.026kJ/mol28.01010 ±
0.00085		630-08-0*2
30.5 Carbon monoxideCO (g)[C-]#[O+]-113.803-110.523± 0.026kJ/mol28.01010 ±
0.00085		630-08-0*0
30.2 Carbon monoxide cation[CO]+ (g)[C]#[O+]1238.3061241.586± 0.026kJ/mol28.00955 ±
0.00085		12144-04-6*0
24.1 TolueneC6H5CH3 (l)c1ccc(cc1)C19.7211.97± 0.34kJ/mol92.1384 ±
0.0056		108-88-3*500

Most Influential reactions involving [CO2]+ (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient		 TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.7831770.1 CO2 (g) → [CO2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 111112.3 ± 0.8 cm-1Rupper 2004
0.1251770.7 CO2 (g) → [CO2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 111113.2 ± 2 cm-1Wiedmann 1995
0.0551770.6 CO2 (g) → [CO2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 111111.0 ± 3 cm-1Merkt 1993
0.0201174.4 [NNN]+ (g) + [CO]+ (g) + [O2]+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + [N2]+ (g) + [NO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -118.33 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0171174.2 [NNN]+ (g) + [CO]+ (g) + [O2]+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + [N2]+ (g) + [NO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -119.70 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0171174.3 [NNN]+ (g) + [CO]+ (g) + [O2]+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + [N2]+ (g) + [NO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -120.61 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0171175.2 [NNN]+ (g) + [CO]+ (g) + O+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + [N2]+ (g) + N+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -1.70 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0171175.3 [NNN]+ (g) + [CO]+ (g) + O+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + [N2]+ (g) + N+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -2.15 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0171175.4 [NNN]+ (g) + [CO]+ (g) + O+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + [N2]+ (g) + N+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.11 ± 1.50 (×1.067) kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0151174.1 [NNN]+ (g) + [CO]+ (g) + [O2]+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + [N2]+ (g) + [NO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -119.94 ± 1.72 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0151175.1 [NNN]+ (g) + [CO]+ (g) + O+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + [N2]+ (g) + N+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -1.49 ± 1.72 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0141172.4 NNN (g) + CO (g) + [O2]+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + N2 (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -113.80 ± 1.2 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0121172.3 NNN (g) + CO (g) + [O2]+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + N2 (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -114.08 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0121172.2 NNN (g) + CO (g) + [O2]+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + N2 (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -112.64 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0111770.4 CO2 (g) → [CO2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 111119 ± 4 (×1.646) cm-1Fielding 1991
0.0101172.1 NNN (g) + CO (g) + [O2]+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + N2 (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -114.81 ± 1.4 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0071770.8 CO2 (g) → [CO2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.776 ± 0.001 eVReineck 1983
0.0061770.5 CO2 (g) → [CO2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 111121 ± 4 (×2.134) cm-1Cossart-Magos 1987, note unc
0.0011771.2 CO2 (g) → [CO2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.776 ± 0.002 eVPotts 1980
0.0011771.1 CO2 (g) → [CO2]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.778 ± 0.002 eVWang 1988
References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122p of the Thermochemical Network (2020); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   P. B. Changala, T. L. Nguyen, J. H. Baraban, G. B. Ellison, J. F. Stanton, D. H. Bross, and B. Ruscic,
Active Thermochemical Tables: The Adiabatic Ionization Energy of Hydrogen Peroxide.
J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 8799-8806 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b06221] (highlighted on the journal cover)
5   D. Feller, D. H. Bross, and B. Ruscic,
Enthalpy of Formation of N2H4 (Hydrazine) Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 6187-6198 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b06017]
6   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.