Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122o of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122h [4] to include the ionization energy of H2O2. [5].

Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
CyclobutaneCH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g)C1CCC152.3427.80± 0.41kJ/mol56.1063 ±
0.0032		287-23-0*0

Representative Geometry of CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 85.3% of the provenance of ΔfH° of CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g).
A total of 40 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)		TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
38.23057.1 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) → 2 CH2CH2 (g) ΔrG°(750 K) = -13.37 ± 0.12 kcal/molQuick 1972, 3rd Law, note unc3
24.93061.1 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (l) + 6 O2 (g) → 4 CO2 (g) + 4 H2O (l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -650.33 ± 0.12 kcal/molKaarsemaker 1952, Coops 1950, as quoted by Cox 1970
6.23060.1 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 23.92 ± 0.48 kJ/molMajer 1985
5.63060.2 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) ΔrH°(285.67 K) = 5.781 ± 0.12 kcal/molRathjens 1953, est unc
2.1118.2 1/2 O2 (g) + H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/molRossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
0.92032.1 CH2CH2 (g) + 3 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -1411.18 ± 0.30 kJ/molRossini 1937
0.83059.5 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.16 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.71888.1 2 H2 (g) + C (graphite) → CH4 (g) ΔrG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/molSmith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
0.63059.4 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.07 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.63059.2 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.80 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.53059.1 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.13 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.43058.5 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -35.85 ± 1.2 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.41764.7 C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.464 ± 0.024 kJ/molHawtin 1966, note CO2e
0.43058.2 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -35.34 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.43058.4 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -35.96 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.33059.3 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.17 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.33057.7 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) → 2 CH2CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 17.21 ± 1.2 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.33058.1 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -35.59 ± 1.4 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.33057.4 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) → 2 CH2CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 16.23 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.31810.2 CO (g) → C+ (g) + O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 22.3713 ± 0.0015 eVNg 2007

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation
Coefficent
(%)		Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
69.8 CyclobutaneCH2(CH2CH2CH2) (l)C1CCC13.92± 0.41kJ/mol56.1063 ±
0.0032		287-23-0*590
38.1 EthyleneCH2CH2 (g)C=C60.8752.35± 0.12kJ/mol28.0532 ±
0.0016		74-85-1*0
38.1 Ethylene cation[CH2CH2]+ (g)C=[CH2+]1075.181067.97± 0.12kJ/mol28.0526 ±
0.0016		34470-02-5*0
26.6 EthaneCH3CH3 (g)CC-68.36-83.98± 0.13kJ/mol30.0690 ±
0.0017		74-84-0*0
22.5 WaterH2O (cr, l, eq.press.)O-286.304-285.832± 0.026kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*499
22.5 Oxonium[H3O]+ (aq)[OH3+]-285.830± 0.026kJ/mol19.02267 ±
0.00037		13968-08-6*800
22.5 WaterH2O (l, eq.press.)O-285.832± 0.026kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*589
22.5 WaterH2O (l)O-285.830± 0.026kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*590
22.5 WaterH2O (cr,l)O-286.302-285.830± 0.026kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*500
22.5 WaterH2O (g)O-238.932-241.836± 0.026kJ/mol18.01528 ±
0.00033		7732-18-5*0

Most Influential reactions involving CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient		 TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.5703057.1 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) → 2 CH2CH2 (g) ΔrG°(750 K) = -13.37 ± 0.12 kcal/molQuick 1972, 3rd Law, note unc3
0.4213060.1 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 23.92 ± 0.48 kJ/molMajer 1985
0.3853060.2 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (l) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) ΔrH°(285.67 K) = 5.781 ± 0.12 kcal/molRathjens 1953, est unc
0.0613063.5 CH3CH(CH2CH2) (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.68 ± 1.2 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0523063.4 CH3CH(CH2CH2) (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.92 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0523063.2 CH3CH(CH2CH2) (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.11 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0453063.1 CH3CH(CH2CH2) (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.88 ± 1.4 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0343063.3 CH3CH(CH2CH2) (g) → CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.91 ± 1.6 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0233059.5 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.16 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0183059.4 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.07 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0183059.2 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.80 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0153059.1 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.13 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0113059.3 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH3 (g) → CH2(CH2CH2) (g) + CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.17 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0073058.5 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -35.85 ± 1.2 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0063058.2 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -35.34 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0063058.4 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -35.96 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0053057.7 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) → 2 CH2CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 17.21 ± 1.2 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0053058.1 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) + H2 (g) → CH3CH2CH2CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -35.59 ± 1.4 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0043057.4 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) → 2 CH2CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 16.23 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0043057.3 CH2(CH2CH2CH2) (g) → 2 CH2CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 15.98 ± 1.4 kcal/molRuscic G3X
References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122o of the Thermochemical Network (2020); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   Y.-C. Chang, B. Xiong, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and C. Y. Ng,
A Vacuum Ultraviolet laser Pulsed Field Ionization-Photoion Study of Methane (CH4): Determination of the Appearance Energy of Methylium From Methane with Unprecedented Precision and the Resulting Impact on the Bond Dissociation Energies of CH4 and CH4+.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 9592-9605 (2017) [DOI: 10.1039/c6cp08200a] (part of 2017 PCCP Hot Articles collection)
5   P. B. Changala, T. L. Nguyen, J. H. Baraban, G. B. Ellison, J. F. Stanton, D. H. Bross, and B. Ruscic,
Active Thermochemical Tables: The Adiabatic Ionization Energy of Hydrogen Peroxide.
J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 8799-8806 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b06221] (highlighted on the journal cover)
6   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.