Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122e of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122d [4] to include chemical species related to methyl acetate and methyl formate [5].

Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
Nitrate[ON(O)O]- (g)O=[N+]([O-])[O-]-300.17-306.64± 0.60kJ/mol62.00549 ±
0.00090		14797-55-8*0

Representative Geometry of [ON(O)O]- (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of [ON(O)O]- (g)

The 13 contributors listed below account for 90.4% of the provenance of ΔfH° of [ON(O)O]- (g).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)		TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
37.31683.2 [ON(O)O]- (g) + HBr (g) → Br- (g) + HON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(391 K) = -1.03 ± 0.21 kcal/molDavidson 1977, 2nd Law
18.11677.1 [ON(O)O]- (g) → ON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 3.937 ± 0.014 eVWeaver 1991
13.71683.1 [ON(O)O]- (g) + HBr (g) → Br- (g) + HON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.045 ± 0.015 eVFerguson 1972b
8.11683.3 [ON(O)O]- (g) + HBr (g) → Br- (g) + HON(O)O (g) ΔrG°(391 K) = 0.76 ± 0.45 kcal/molDavidson 1977, 3rd Law
3.91677.2 [ON(O)O]- (g) → ON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 3.92 ± 0.03 eVWang 2002
2.11680.8 HON(O)O (g) → H+ (g) + [ON(O)O]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 323.57 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
1.31440.3 (NH4)NO3 (cr,l) → N2 (g) + 1/2 O2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(293.65 K) = -49.44 ± 0.06 kcal/molBecker 1934
1.21677.12 [ON(O)O]- (g) → ON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 3.987 ± 0.050 (×1.067) eVRuscic W1RO
1.01671.1 2 ONO (g) + 1/2 O2 (g) + H2O (g) → 2 HON(O)O (g) ΔrG°(371 K) = -6.04 ± 0.63 kJ/molJones 1943, 3rd Law
0.91677.8 [ON(O)O]- (g) → ON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 3.965 ± 0.061 eVRuscic G4
0.81679.8 [ON(O)O]- (g) → N (g) + 3 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 361.02 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.61679.3 [ON(O)O]- (g) → N (g) + 3 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 362.71 ± 1.72 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.61681.1 ON(O)O (g) → O (g) + ONO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 17079 ± 15 cm-1Johnston 1996, Davis 1993

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of [ON(O)O]- (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation
Coefficent
(%)		Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
21.6 Nitric acidHON(O)O (g)O[N+](=O)[O-]-124.49-134.21± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091		7697-37-2*0
18.4 Nitric acidHON(O)O (cr,l)O[N+](=O)[O-]-179.02-173.29± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091		7697-37-2*500
18.2 Nitric acidHON(O)O (aq)O[N+](=O)[O-]-206.64± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091		7697-37-2*800
18.2 Nitrate[ON(O)O]- (aq)O=[N+]([O-])[O-]-206.64± 0.18kJ/mol62.00549 ±
0.00090		14797-55-8*800
18.2 Nitric acidHON(O)O (aq, 3 H2O)O[N+](=O)[O-]-197.77± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091		7697-37-2*805
18.1 Nitric acidHON(O)O (aq, 1000 H2O)O[N+](=O)[O-]-206.32± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091		7697-37-2*839
18.1 Nitric acidHON(O)O (aq, 1 H2O)O[N+](=O)[O-]-186.85± 0.18kJ/mol63.01288 ±
0.00091		7697-37-2*801
17.9 Nitric acid monohydrate(HON(O)O)(H2O) (cr,l)O[N+](=O)[O-].O-479.18-472.68± 0.19kJ/mol81.0282 ±
0.0012		13444-82-1*500
17.2 Ammonium nitrate(NH4)NO3 (cr,l)[NH4+].O=[N+]([O-])[O-]-350.29-365.26± 0.18kJ/mol80.04344 ±
0.00095		6484-52-2*500
16.9 Nitric acid trihydrate(HON(O)O)(H2O)3 (cr,l)O[N+](=O)[O-].O.O.O-1062.10-1055.25± 0.21kJ/mol117.0587 ±
0.0019		13444-83-2*500

Most Influential reactions involving [ON(O)O]- (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient		 TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.4311683.2 [ON(O)O]- (g) + HBr (g) → Br- (g) + HON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(391 K) = -1.03 ± 0.21 kcal/molDavidson 1977, 2nd Law
0.2001677.1 [ON(O)O]- (g) → ON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 3.937 ± 0.014 eVWeaver 1991
0.1591683.1 [ON(O)O]- (g) + HBr (g) → Br- (g) + HON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.045 ± 0.015 eVFerguson 1972b
0.0941683.3 [ON(O)O]- (g) + HBr (g) → Br- (g) + HON(O)O (g) ΔrG°(391 K) = 0.76 ± 0.45 kcal/molDavidson 1977, 3rd Law
0.0431677.2 [ON(O)O]- (g) → ON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 3.92 ± 0.03 eVWang 2002
0.0241680.8 HON(O)O (g) → H+ (g) + [ON(O)O]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 323.57 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0131677.12 [ON(O)O]- (g) → ON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 3.987 ± 0.050 (×1.067) eVRuscic W1RO
0.0101677.8 [ON(O)O]- (g) → ON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 3.965 ± 0.061 eVRuscic G4
0.0101682.1 [ON(O)O]- (g) + NO (g) → [ONO]- (g) + ONO (g) ΔrG°(300 K) = 12.13 ± 1.75 kcal/molMcFarland 1972, Parkes 1972, Fehsenfeld 1969, note unc4
0.0091679.8 [ON(O)O]- (g) → N (g) + 3 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 361.02 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0061679.3 [ON(O)O]- (g) → N (g) + 3 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 362.71 ± 1.72 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0061680.7 HON(O)O (g) → H+ (g) + [ON(O)O]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 323.02 ± 1.7 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0051679.4 [ON(O)O]- (g) → N (g) + 3 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 363.06 ± 1.60 (×1.164) kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0051677.4 [ON(O)O]- (g) → ON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 374 ± 8 kJ/molBuchelnikova 1958
0.0051677.7 [ON(O)O]- (g) → ON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 3.972 ± 0.085 eVRuscic G3X
0.0051677.3 [ON(O)O]- (g) → ON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 89.7 ± 2.0 kcal/molYamdagni 1974, est unc
0.0041680.4 HON(O)O (g) → H+ (g) + [ON(O)O]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 323.19 ± 2.00 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0041677.10 [ON(O)O]- (g) → ON(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 3.944 ± 0.092 eVRuscic CBS-n
0.0031680.6 HON(O)O (g) → H+ (g) + [ON(O)O]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 322.25 ± 2.30 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0031680.3 HON(O)O (g) → H+ (g) + [ON(O)O]- (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 323.34 ± 2.42 kcal/molRuscic G3X
References (for your convenience, also available in RIS and BibTex format)
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122e of the Thermochemical Network, Argonne National Laboratory (2019); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   L. Cheng, J. Gauss, B. Ruscic, P. Armentrout, and J. Stanton,
Bond Dissociation Energies for Diatomic Molecules Containing 3d Transition Metals: Benchmark Scalar-Relativistic Coupled-Cluster Calculations for Twenty Molecules.
J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 1044-1056 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00970]
5   J. P. Porterfield, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, J. H. Thorpe, T. L. Nguyen, J. H. Baraban, J. F. Stanton, J. W. Daily, and G. B. Ellison,
Thermal Decomposition of Potential Ester Biofuels, Part I: Methyl Acetate and Methyl Butanoate.
J. Chem. Phys. A 121, 4658-4677 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b02639] (Veronica Vaida Festschrift)
6   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.