Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122d of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122b [4][5] to include the enthalpies of formation of methylamine, dimethylamine and trimethylamine that were used as reference values to derive the bond dissociation energies of 20 diatomic molecules containing 3d transition metals.[6].

Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
NitrosobenzeneC6H5NO (g)c1ccc(cc1)N=O215.7198.7± 1.2kJ/mol107.1100 ±
0.0048		586-96-9*0

Representative Geometry of C6H5NO (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of C6H5NO (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 80.3% of the provenance of ΔfH° of C6H5NO (g).
A total of 39 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)		TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
22.94667.1 C6H5NO (g) → C6H5 (g) + NO (g) ΔrG°(391 K) = 39.48 ± 0.5 kcal/molPark 1997, Yu 1994a, 3rd Law
17.84666.1 C6H5NO (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.607 ± 0.020 eVStevens 2010a
4.74667.3 C6H5NO (g) → C6H5 (g) + NO (g) ΔrG°(525 K) = 33.43 ± 1.1 kcal/molPark 1997, Yu 1994a, 3rd Law
4.44666.9 C6H5NO (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.601 ± 0.040 eVRuscic W1RO
3.14665.8 C6H5NO (g) → 6 C (g) + 5 H (g) + N (g) + O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1398.90 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
2.94669.5 C6H5N(O)O (g) + NO (g) → C6H5NO (g) + ONO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 19.87 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
2.84665.4 C6H5NO (g) → 6 C (g) + 5 H (g) + N (g) + O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1398.56 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic G4
2.44665.3 C6H5NO (g) → 6 C (g) + 5 H (g) + N (g) + O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1398.35 ± 1.72 kcal/molRuscic G3X
2.34669.4 C6H5N(O)O (g) + NO (g) → C6H5NO (g) + ONO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 18.62 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
2.34669.2 C6H5N(O)O (g) + NO (g) → C6H5NO (g) + ONO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 19.30 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
1.94669.1 C6H5N(O)O (g) + NO (g) → C6H5NO (g) + ONO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 19.75 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
1.94671.2 2 C6H5N(O)O (cr,l) + 25/2 O2 (g) → 12 CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (cr,l) + N2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -6170.83 ± 3.8 (×1.874) kJ/molVerevkin 2014
1.74454.1 [C6H5]- (g) → C6H5 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.096 ± 0.006 eVGunion 1992
1.44670.5 C6H5N(O)O (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → C6H5CH3 (g) + CH3N(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.15 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
1.44669.3 C6H5N(O)O (g) + NO (g) → C6H5NO (g) + ONO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 20.28 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
1.34666.5 C6H5NO (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.605 ± 0.073 eVRuscic G4
1.24666.8 C6H5NO (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.608 ± 0.075 eVRuscic CBS-n
1.14670.4 C6H5N(O)O (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → C6H5CH3 (g) + CH3N(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.20 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
1.14670.2 C6H5N(O)O (g) + CH3CH3 (g) → C6H5CH3 (g) + CH3N(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.43 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.94667.4 C6H5NO (g) → C6H5 (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(525 K) = 56.96 ± 2.2 (×1.091) kcal/molPark 1997, Yu 1994a, 2nd Law

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of C6H5NO (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation
Coefficent
(%)		Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
37.6 Phenylium[C6H5]+ (g)c1cccc[c+]11148.451135.67± 0.88kJ/mol77.1034 ±
0.0048		17333-73-2*0
37.6 Phenylium[C6H5]+ (g, singlet)c1cccc[c+]11148.451135.67± 0.88kJ/mol77.1034 ±
0.0048		17333-73-2*2
36.5 NitrobenzeneC6H5N(O)O (g)c1ccc(cc1)[N+](=O)[O-]81.561.5± 1.4kJ/mol123.1094 ±
0.0049		98-95-3*0
36.4 NitrobenzeneC6H5N(O)O (cr,l)c1ccc(cc1)[N+](=O)[O-]6.4± 1.4kJ/mol123.1094 ±
0.0049		98-95-3*500
25.7 IodobenzeneC6H5I (g)c1ccc(cc1)I177.7161.7± 1.0kJ/mol204.0084 ±
0.0048		591-50-4*0
25.7 Iodobenzene cation[C6H5I]+ (g)c1ccc(cc1)[I+]1022.71007.2± 1.0kJ/mol204.0078 ±
0.0048		38406-85-8*0
25.4 PhenylC6H5 (g)c1cccc[c]1350.19336.83± 0.56kJ/mol77.1039 ±
0.0048		2396-01-2*0
23.6 IodobenzeneC6H5I (cr,l)c1ccc(cc1)I112.8112.9± 1.1kJ/mol204.0084 ±
0.0048		591-50-4*500
18.0 BromobenzeneC6H5Br (g)c1ccc(cc1)Br126.6104.6± 1.3kJ/mol157.0079 ±
0.0049		108-86-1*0
18.0 Bromobenzene cation[C6H5Br]+ (g)c1ccc(cc1)[Br+]994.7973.2± 1.3kJ/mol157.0074 ±
0.0049		55450-33-4*0

Most Influential reactions involving C6H5NO (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient		 TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.3534666.1 C6H5NO (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.607 ± 0.020 eVStevens 2010a
0.2964667.1 C6H5NO (g) → C6H5 (g) + NO (g) ΔrG°(391 K) = 39.48 ± 0.5 kcal/molPark 1997, Yu 1994a, 3rd Law
0.1444669.5 C6H5N(O)O (g) + NO (g) → C6H5NO (g) + ONO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 19.87 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.1164669.4 C6H5N(O)O (g) + NO (g) → C6H5NO (g) + ONO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 18.62 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.1164669.2 C6H5N(O)O (g) + NO (g) → C6H5NO (g) + ONO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 19.30 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0964669.1 C6H5N(O)O (g) + NO (g) → C6H5NO (g) + ONO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 19.75 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0884666.9 C6H5NO (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.601 ± 0.040 eVRuscic W1RO
0.0694669.3 C6H5N(O)O (g) + NO (g) → C6H5NO (g) + ONO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 20.28 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0614667.3 C6H5NO (g) → C6H5 (g) + NO (g) ΔrG°(525 K) = 33.43 ± 1.1 kcal/molPark 1997, Yu 1994a, 3rd Law
0.0344665.8 C6H5NO (g) → 6 C (g) + 5 H (g) + N (g) + O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1398.90 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0294665.4 C6H5NO (g) → 6 C (g) + 5 H (g) + N (g) + O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1398.56 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0264666.5 C6H5NO (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.605 ± 0.073 eVRuscic G4
0.0254665.3 C6H5NO (g) → 6 C (g) + 5 H (g) + N (g) + O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1398.35 ± 1.72 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0254666.8 C6H5NO (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.608 ± 0.075 eVRuscic CBS-n
0.0164666.4 C6H5NO (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.630 ± 0.093 eVRuscic G3X
0.0144666.7 C6H5NO (g) → [C6H5]+ (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.632 ± 0.099 eVRuscic CBS-n
0.0124667.4 C6H5NO (g) → C6H5 (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(525 K) = 56.96 ± 2.2 (×1.091) kcal/molPark 1997, Yu 1994a, 2nd Law
0.0124667.2 C6H5NO (g) → C6H5 (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(382 K) = 56.35 ± 2.4 kcal/molPark 1997, Yu 1994a, 2nd Law
0.0034667.6 C6H5NO (g) → C6H5 (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(810 K) = 50.38 ± 4.4 kcal/molHorn 1996, 2nd Law
0.0034667.7 C6H5NO (g) → C6H5 (g) + NO (g) ΔrH°(700 K) = 50.4 ± 5 kcal/molChoo 1975, 2nd Law, note unc3
References (for your convenience, also available in RIS and BibTex format)
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122d of the Thermochemical Network, Argonne National Laboratory (2018); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   B. Ruscic,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Sequential Bond Dissociation Enthalpies of Methane, Ethane, and Methanol and the Related Thermochemistry.
J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 7810-7837 (2015) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b01346]
5   T. L. Nguyen, J. H. Baraban, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton,
On the HCN – HNC Energy Difference.
J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 10929-10934 (2015) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b08406]
6   L. Cheng, J. Gauss, B. Ruscic, P. Armentrout, and J. Stanton,
Bond Dissociation Energies for Diatomic Molecules Containing 3d Transition Metals: Benchmark Scalar-Relativistic Coupled-Cluster Calculations for Twenty Molecules.
J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 1044-1056 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00970]
7   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [7]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.