Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.176 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.172 to include species related to Criegee intermediates that are involved in several ongoing studies[4].

Nitrogen atom cation

Formula: N+ (g)

CAS RN: 14158-23-7

ATcT ID: 14158-23-7*0

SMILES: [N+]

InChI: InChI=1S/N/q+1

InChIKey: DELRCXTYJVVNEW-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: N1+

2D Image:

Aliases: N+; Nitrogen atom cation; Nitrogen atom ion (1+); Nitrogen cation; Nitrogen ion (1+); Atomic nitrogen cation; Atomic nitrogen ion (1+); Nitrogen radical cation; Nitrogen radical ion (1+); Mononitrogen cation; Mononitrogen ion (1+)

Relative Molecular Mass: 14.006191 ± 0.000070

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
1872.911	1875.692	± 0.022	kJ/mol

3D Image of N+ (g)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of N+ (g)

The 19 contributors listed below account for 90.1% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of N+ (g).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
24.5	1436.3	N2 (g) → N+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 24.2880 ± 0.0009 eV	Tang 2005
19.8	1436.2	N2 (g) → N+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 24.2883 ± 0.0010 eV	Tang 2005
19.8	1436.1	N2 (g) → N+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 24.2888 ± 0.0010 eV	Tang 2005
8.2	1413.11	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 941.14 ± 0.15 kJ/mol	Thorpe 2021
6.3	1437.2	[N2]+ (g) → N+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 70248 ± 12 (×1.189) cm-1	Hertzler 1992, Douglas 1952, Hertzler 1990, Janin 1957, est unc
3.9	1420.10	N2 (g) → 2 N (g, doublet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 117127.5 ± 18.0 cm-1	Roncin 1984, note N2
2.5	1420.9	N2 (g) → 2 N (g, doublet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 117105.5 ± 22.7 cm-1	Roncin 1984, note N2
0.7	1410.2	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 78716 ± 40 (×1.022) cm-1	Carroll 1965, note N2
0.5	1413.7	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 941.56 ± 0.56 kJ/mol	Harding 2008
0.5	1410.1	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 78715 ± 50 cm-1	Buttenbender 1935, Gaydon 1968, note N2, as quoted by CODATA Key Vals
0.4	1412.4	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 225.01 ± 0.15 kcal/mol	Karton 2007a, Karton 2006, Karton 2011
0.3	1413.4	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 941.61 ± 0.70 kJ/mol	Bomble 2006
0.3	1413.5	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 941.74 ± 0.70 kJ/mol	Harding 2008
0.3	1413.6	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 941.09 ± 0.74 kJ/mol	Harding 2008
0.3	1413.3	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 941.14 ± 0.75 kJ/mol	Bomble 2006
0.3	1413.1	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 941.07 ± 0.75 kJ/mol	Tajti 2004, est unc
0.2	1413.2	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 941.78 ± 0.80 kJ/mol	Bomble 2006
0.2	1414.1	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 225.0 ± 0.2 kcal/mol	Feller 2006a
0.2	1414.6	N2 (g) → 2 N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 224.99 ± 0.20 kcal/mol	Feller 2014

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of N+ (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
99.9	Nitrogen atom	N (g)	470.583	472.445	± 0.022	kJ/mol	14.006740 ± 0.000070	17778-88-0*0
99.9	Nitrogen atom	N (g, quartet)	470.583	472.445	± 0.022	kJ/mol	14.006740 ± 0.000070	17778-88-0*1
99.9	Nitrogen atom	N (g, doublet)	700.559	702.462	± 0.022	kJ/mol	14.006740 ± 0.000070	17778-88-0*2
93.1	Nitrogen atom dication	[N]+2 (g)	4728.998	4731.826	± 0.024	kJ/mol	14.005643 ± 0.000070	17439-59-7*0
31.0	Nitric oxide	NO (g)	90.627	91.131	± 0.064	kJ/mol	30.00614 ± 0.00031	10102-43-9*0
31.0	Nitrogen dioxide	ONO (g)	36.866	34.059	± 0.064	kJ/mol	46.00554 ± 0.00060	10102-44-0*0
31.0	Nitrosyl ion	[NO]+ (g)	984.494	984.489	± 0.064	kJ/mol	30.00559 ± 0.00031	14452-93-8*0
30.1	Dinitrogen tetraoxide	O2NNO2 (g)	20.17	10.88	± 0.14	kJ/mol	92.0111 ± 0.0012	10544-72-6*0
29.9	Nitrosyl chloride	ClNO (g)	54.461	52.559	± 0.067	kJ/mol	65.45884 ± 0.00095	2696-92-6*0
29.2	Dioxohydrazine	ONNO (g, cis)	172.91	171.14	± 0.14	kJ/mol	60.01228 ± 0.00062	16824-89-8*2

Most Influential reactions involving N+ (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.999	1426.1	N+ (g) → [N]+2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 238750.2 ± 0.7 cm-1	NIST Atomic Web, Biemont 1999
0.658	1424.1	N (g) → N+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 117225.4 ± 0.1 cm-1	McConkey 1968, Moore 1970
0.245	1436.3	N2 (g) → N+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 24.2880 ± 0.0009 eV	Tang 2005
0.198	1436.2	N2 (g) → N+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 24.2883 ± 0.0010 eV	Tang 2005
0.198	1436.1	N2 (g) → N+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 24.2888 ± 0.0010 eV	Tang 2005
0.168	1424.4	N (g) → N+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 117225.66 ± 0.11 (×1.795) cm-1	Eriksson 1986, de Beer 1992, est unc
0.073	1424.5	N (g) → N+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 117225.4 ± 0.3 cm-1	Biemont 1999
0.073	1424.3	N (g) → N+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 117225.7 ± 0.3 cm-1	Eriksson 1971
0.065	8542.1	SiF4 (g) + N+ (g) → [SiF4]+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.77 ± 0.38 eV	Kickel 1993, note unc
0.063	1437.2	[N2]+ (g) → N+ (g) + N (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 70248 ± 12 (×1.189) cm-1	Hertzler 1992, Douglas 1952, Hertzler 1990, Janin 1957, est unc
0.026	1424.2	N (g) → N+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 117225.35 ± 0.5 cm-1	McConkey 1968
0.025	1709.5	N+ (g) + H2 (g) → [NH]+ (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.016 ± 0.015 eV	Tarroni 1997, Tosi 1994, est unc
0.019	1449.4	[NNN]+ (g) + [CO]+ (g) + O+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + [N2]+ (g) + N+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.12 ± 1.50 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.017	1449.3	[NNN]+ (g) + [CO]+ (g) + O+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + [N2]+ (g) + N+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -2.38 ± 1.60 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.017	1449.2	[NNN]+ (g) + [CO]+ (g) + O+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + [N2]+ (g) + N+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.93 ± 1.60 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.015	1449.1	[NNN]+ (g) + [CO]+ (g) + O+ (g) → [CO2]+ (g) + [N2]+ (g) + N+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -1.72 ± 1.72 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.010	1709.2	N+ (g) + H2 (g) → [NH]+ (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.046 ± 0.016 (×1.477) eV	Ervin 1987, Adams 1985
0.009	1709.1	N+ (g) + H2 (g) → [NH]+ (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.033 ± 0.024 eV	Ervin 1987
0.007	1703.1	[NH]+ (g) → N+ (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 102.99 ± 0.63 kcal/mol	Galek 2006
0.006	1709.3	N+ (g) + H2 (g) → [NH]+ (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.022 ± 0.03 eV	Ervin 1987, Marquette 1985, est unc

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.176 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4		T. L. Nguyen et al, ongoing studies (2024)
5		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.