Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.176 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.172 to include species related to Criegee intermediates that are involved in several ongoing studies[4].

Neon cation

Formula: Ne+ (g)

CAS RN: 14782-23-1

ATcT ID: 14782-23-1*0

SMILES: [Ne+]

InChI: InChI=1S/Ne/q+1

InChIKey: LANGVOCUTJKVFC-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: Ne1+

2D Image:

Aliases: Ne+; Neon cation; Neon ion (1+); Neon atom cation; Neon atom ion (1+); Atomic neon cation; Atomic neon ion (1+)

Relative Molecular Mass: 20.17915 ± 0.00060

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
2080.662	2080.769	± 0.000	kJ/mol

3D Image of Ne+ (g)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of Ne+ (g)

The 2 contributors listed below account for 90.0% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of Ne+ (g).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
62.3	9333.1	Ne (g) → Ne+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 173929.773 ± 0.040 cm-1	Eikema 1994, Harth 1987
27.6	9333.2	Ne (g) → Ne+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 173929.75 ± 0.06 cm-1	Kaufman 1972, Saloman 2004

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of Ne+ (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Image	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
10.5	Neon dication	[Ne]+2 (g)		6032.988	6033.214	± 0.0041	kJ/mol	20.17860 ± 0.00060	14041-55-5*0
1.2	Neon trication	[Ne]+3 (g)		12152.403	12152.403	± 0.032	kJ/mol	20.17805 ± 0.00060	14158-25-9*0

Most Influential reactions involving Ne+ (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.992	9334.1	Ne+ (g) → [Ne]+2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 330388.6 ± 0.3 cm-1	Persson 1971, Kramida 2006a
0.623	9333.1	Ne (g) → Ne+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 173929.773 ± 0.040 cm-1	Eikema 1994, Harth 1987
0.277	9333.2	Ne (g) → Ne+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 173929.75 ± 0.06 cm-1	Kaufman 1972, Saloman 2004
0.099	9333.3	Ne (g) → Ne+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 173929.70 ± 0.1 cm-1	Moore 1970, Minnhagen 1969, est unc
0.019	9347.4	[NeH]+ (g) → Ne+ (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 233.37 ± 1.50 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.016	9347.3	[NeH]+ (g) → Ne+ (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 232.74 ± 1.60 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.016	9347.1	[NeH]+ (g) → Ne+ (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 231.73 ± 1.60 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.009	9347.2	[NeH]+ (g) → Ne+ (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 233.82 ± 2.16 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.003	9334.2	Ne+ (g) → [Ne]+2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 330391.0 ± 5 cm-1	Moore 1970, Edlen 1969, Edlen 1964, est unc
0.003	9334.3	Ne+ (g) → [Ne]+2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 330391.2 ± 5 cm-1	Biemont 1999, est unc
0.000	9333.4	Ne (g) → Ne+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 173925.5 ± 4.2 (×1.022) cm-1	Biemont 1999
0.000	9333.5	Ne (g) → Ne+ (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 21.56401 ± 0.00088 eV	Klopper 2010

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.176 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4		T. L. Nguyen et al, ongoing studies (2024)
5		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.