Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.176 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.172 to include species related to Criegee intermediates that are involved in several ongoing studies[4].

Ethenedione anion

Formula: [OCCO]- (g)
CAS RN: 77783-15-4
ATcT ID: 77783-15-4*0
SMILES: O=C=C=[O-]
InChI: InChI=1S/C2O2/c3-1-2-4/q-1
InChIKey: SUKKXZMQLWQROF-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Hills Formula: C2O2-

2D Image:

O=C=C=[O-]
Aliases: [OCCO]-; Ethenedione anion; Ethenedione ion (1-); Ethylenedione anion; Ethylenedione ion (1-); Oxoketene anion; Oxoketene ion (1-); OCCO-; [O=C=C=O]-; O=C=C=O-
Relative Molecular Mass: 56.0207 ± 0.0017

   ΔfH°(0 K)   ΔfH°(298.15 K)UncertaintyUnits
-149.7-147.1± 1.7kJ/mol

3D Image of [OCCO]- (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of [OCCO]- (g)

The 15 contributors listed below account for 90.1% of the provenance of ΔfH° of [OCCO]- (g).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
27.87860.7 [OCCO]- (g) → OCCO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.717 ± 0.020 eVLunny 2018
10.77865.6 OCCO (g) → 2 CO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -242.03 ± 2.00 kJ/molKlippenstein 2017
10.77864.1 CH4 (g) + 2 H2O (g) → OCCO (g) + 6 H2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 625.09 ± 2.00 kJ/molKlippenstein 2017
7.17869.5 [OCCO]- (g) → 2 CO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -19.46 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
6.27869.2 [OCCO]- (g) → 2 CO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -19.66 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic G4
5.47869.1 [OCCO]- (g) → 2 CO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -19.20 ± 1.72 kcal/molRuscic G3X
4.47860.6 [OCCO]- (g) → OCCO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.671 ± 0.050 eVRuscic W1RO
3.87870.5 [OCCO]- (g) → [OCCO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.967 ± 0.050 eVRuscic W1RO
3.47869.3 [OCCO]- (g) → 2 CO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -18.40 ± 2.16 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
2.97860.3 [OCCO]- (g) → OCCO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.741 ± 0.061 eVRuscic G4
1.87870.2 [OCCO]- (g) → [OCCO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.969 ± 0.073 eVRuscic G4
1.57860.2 [OCCO]- (g) → OCCO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.668 ± 0.085 eVRuscic G3X
1.37871.5 [OCCO]+ (g) → [CO]+ (g) CO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 51.00 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
1.37860.4 [OCCO]- (g) → OCCO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.734 ± 0.092 eVRuscic CBS-n
1.17871.2 [OCCO]+ (g) → [CO]+ (g) CO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 51.46 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic G4

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of [OCCO]- (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.


Correlation
Coefficent
(%)
Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass
ATcT ID
55.8 EthenedioneOCCO (g)O=C=C=O14.517.0± 1.2kJ/mol56.0202 ±
0.0017
4363-38-6*0
37.0 Ethenedione cation[OCCO]+ (g)O=C=C=[O+]909.5912.6± 2.0kJ/mol56.0197 ±
0.0017
12541-99-0*0
5.8 DioxoethylOCHCO (g)C(=O)[C]=O-63.27-64.69± 0.86kJ/mol57.0281 ±
0.0017
702699-38-5*0
2.9 GlyoxalOCHCHO (g, trans)O=CC=O-207.84-213.48± 0.55kJ/mol58.0361 ±
0.0017
107-22-2*1
2.9 GlyoxalOCHCHO (g)O=CC=O-207.84-213.40± 0.55kJ/mol58.0361 ±
0.0017
107-22-2*0
2.2 MethaneCH4 (g)C-66.547-74.516± 0.043kJ/mol16.04246 ±
0.00085
74-82-8*0
2.2 Carbon monoxideCO (g)[C-]#[O+]-113.794-110.514± 0.026kJ/mol28.01010 ±
0.00085
630-08-0*0
2.2 Carbon monoxideCO (g, singlet)[C-]#[O+]-113.794-110.514± 0.026kJ/mol28.01010 ±
0.00085
630-08-0*2
2.2 Carbon monoxideCO (g, triplet)[C-]#[O+]465.588469.295± 0.026kJ/mol28.01010 ±
0.00085
630-08-0*1
2.2 Carbon monoxide cation[CO]+ (g)[C]#[O+]1238.3151241.595± 0.026kJ/mol28.00955 ±
0.00085
12144-04-6*0

Most Influential reactions involving [OCCO]- (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.5357860.7 [OCCO]- (g) → OCCO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.717 ± 0.020 eVLunny 2018
0.1817870.5 [OCCO]- (g) → [OCCO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.967 ± 0.050 eVRuscic W1RO
0.0857860.6 [OCCO]- (g) → OCCO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.671 ± 0.050 eVRuscic W1RO
0.0847870.2 [OCCO]- (g) → [OCCO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.969 ± 0.073 eVRuscic G4
0.0717869.5 [OCCO]- (g) → 2 CO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -19.46 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0627869.2 [OCCO]- (g) → 2 CO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -19.66 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0577860.3 [OCCO]- (g) → OCCO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.741 ± 0.061 eVRuscic G4
0.0547869.1 [OCCO]- (g) → 2 CO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -19.20 ± 1.72 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0527870.1 [OCCO]- (g) → [OCCO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.970 ± 0.093 eVRuscic G3X
0.0467870.3 [OCCO]- (g) → [OCCO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 11.012 ± 0.099 eVRuscic CBS-n
0.0347869.3 [OCCO]- (g) → 2 CO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -18.40 ± 2.16 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0297860.2 [OCCO]- (g) → OCCO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.668 ± 0.085 eVRuscic G3X
0.0257860.4 [OCCO]- (g) → OCCO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.734 ± 0.092 eVRuscic CBS-n
0.0127860.5 [OCCO]- (g) → OCCO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.574 ± 0.090 (×1.445) eVRuscic CBS-n


References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.176 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   T. L. Nguyen et al, ongoing studies (2024)
5   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.