Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.172 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.156 to include species relevant to a study of photodissociation of formamide[4].

Benzoyl chloride

Formula: C6H5C(O)Cl (cr,l)
CAS RN: 98-88-4
ATcT ID: 98-88-4*500
SMILES: c1ccc(cc1)C(=O)Cl
InChI: InChI=1S/C7H5ClO/c8-7(9)6-4-2-1-3-5-6/h1-5H
InChIKey: PASDCCFISLVPSO-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Hills Formula: C7H5Cl1O1

2D Image:

c1ccc(cc1)C(=O)Cl
Aliases: C6H5C(O)Cl; Benzoyl chloride
Relative Molecular Mass: 140.5667 ± 0.0057

   ΔfH°(0 K)   ΔfH°(298.15 K)UncertaintyUnits
-157.11± 0.26kJ/mol

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of C6H5C(O)Cl (cr,l)

The 13 contributors listed below account for 90.5% of the provenance of ΔfH° of C6H5C(O)Cl (cr,l).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
63.97177.1 C6H5C(O)Cl (cr,l) H2O (cr,l) → C6H5C(O)OH (cr,l) HCl (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -8.136 ± 0.050 kcal/molMoselhy 1975, Davies 1972a
4.72228.7 C (graphite) O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.464 ± 0.024 kJ/molHawtin 1966, note CO2e
3.39238.9 C6H5C(O)OH (cr,l) + 15/2 O2 (g) → 7 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3227.21 ± 0.27 kJ/molChalloner 1955
3.39238.1 C6H5C(O)OH (cr,l) + 15/2 O2 (g) → 7 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3226.86 ± 0.27 kJ/molProsen 1944
2.69238.10 C6H5C(O)OH (cr,l) + 15/2 O2 (g) → 7 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3227.26 ± 0.30 kJ/molCoops 1956
2.39238.4 C6H5C(O)OH (cr,l) + 15/2 O2 (g) → 7 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3226.89 ± 0.32 kJ/molJessup 1946, Jessup 1942, Jessup 1934
1.82228.4 C (graphite) O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.462 ± 0.038 kJ/molLewis 1965, note CO2d
1.82228.5 C (graphite) O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -393.468 ± 0.038 kJ/molFraser 1952, note CO2f
1.59238.7 C6H5C(O)OH (cr,l) + 15/2 O2 (g) → 7 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3226.91 ± 0.40 kJ/molChurney 1968
1.39238.8 C6H5C(O)OH (cr,l) + 15/2 O2 (g) → 7 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3227.42 ± 0.33 (×1.269) kJ/molGundry 1958
1.22228.11 C (graphite) O2 (g) → CO2 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -94.051 ± 0.011 kcal/molProsen 1944a, Cox 1970, NBS TN270, NBS Tables 1989
1.29238.3 C6H5C(O)OH (cr,l) + 15/2 O2 (g) → 7 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3226.90 ± 0.44 kJ/molPilcher 1984
1.09238.2 C6H5C(O)OH (cr,l) + 15/2 O2 (g) → 7 CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3226.84 ± 0.49 kJ/molLi 1990

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of C6H5C(O)Cl (cr,l)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.


Correlation
Coefficent
(%)
Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass
ATcT ID
58.8 Benzoic acidC6H5C(O)OH (cr,l)c1ccc(cc1)C(=O)O-367.34-384.75± 0.17kJ/mol122.1213 ±
0.0056
65-85-0*500
50.7 Benzoic acidC6H5C(O)OH (g)c1ccc(cc1)C(=O)O-274.35-294.14± 0.19kJ/mol122.1213 ±
0.0056
65-85-0*0
36.8 Carbon dioxideCO2 (g)C(=O)=O-393.111-393.478± 0.015kJ/mol44.00950 ±
0.00100
124-38-9*0
36.4 Carbon dioxide cation[CO2]+ (g)[C+](=O)=O936.089936.924± 0.017kJ/mol44.00895 ±
0.00100
12181-61-2*0
30.3 Carbonic acidC(O)(OH)2 (aq, undissoc)OC(=O)O-698.673± 0.028kJ/mol62.0248 ±
0.0012
463-79-6*1000
29.4 Carbon dioxideCO2 (aq, undissoc)C(=O)=O-412.868± 0.018kJ/mol44.00950 ±
0.00100
124-38-9*1000
25.9 Succinic acid(CH2C(O)OH)2 (cr,l)OC(=O)CCC(=O)O-918.50-940.23± 0.12kJ/mol118.0880 ±
0.0034
110-15-6*500
21.5 Hydrogen carbonate[HOC(O)O]- (aq)O[C](=O)[O-]-689.868± 0.039kJ/mol61.0174 ±
0.0012
71-52-3*800
19.9 BenzeneC6H6 (cr,l)c1ccccc150.7749.23± 0.21kJ/mol78.1118 ±
0.0048
71-43-2*500
19.9 BenzeneC6H6 (g)c1ccccc1100.6883.17± 0.21kJ/mol78.1118 ±
0.0048
71-43-2*0

Most Influential reactions involving C6H5C(O)Cl (cr,l)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.9927177.1 C6H5C(O)Cl (cr,l) H2O (cr,l) → C6H5C(O)OH (cr,l) HCl (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -8.136 ± 0.050 kcal/molMoselhy 1975, Davies 1972a
0.1277179.1 C6H5C(O)Cl (cr,l) → C6H5C(O)Cl (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 55.5 ± 1.8 (×1.795) kJ/molThermoData 2004
0.0767179.2 C6H5C(O)Cl (cr,l) → C6H5C(O)Cl (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 13.1 ± 1.0 kcal/molCox 1970
0.0017178.1 C6H5C(O)Cl (cr,l) + 15/2 O2 (g) → 7 CO2 (g) HCl (aq, 600 H2O) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -796.50 ± 1.40 kcal/molHu 1969, est unc
0.0017176.1 C6H5C(O)Cl (cr,l) H2O (cr,l) → C6H5C(O)OH (cr,l) HCl (aq, 1000 H2O) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -24.35 ± 0.10 (×15.66) kcal/molCarson 1950


References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.172 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   K. L. Caster, N. A. Seifert, B. Ruscic, A. W. Jasper, and K. Prozument,
Dynamics of HCN, NHC, and HNCO Formation in the 193 nm Photodissociation of Formamide
J. Phys. Chem. A (in press) (2024) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c02232]
5   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.