Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.172 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.156 to include species relevant to a study of photodissociation of formamide[4].

Disulfene oxide

Formula: SSO (g)
CAS RN: 20901-21-7
ATcT ID: 20901-21-7*0
SMILES: S=S=O
InChI: InChI=1S/OS2/c1-3-2
InChIKey: TXKMVPPZCYKFAC-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Hills Formula: O1S2

2D Image:

S=S=O
Aliases: SSO; Disulfene oxide; 1lambda4-Disulfenone; Disulfur monoxide; Disulfur oxide; Sulfinyl sulfur; OSS; S2O
Relative Molecular Mass: 80.1314 ± 0.0120

   ΔfH°(0 K)   ΔfH°(298.15 K)UncertaintyUnits
-50.62-52.63± 0.43kJ/mol

3D Image of SSO (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of SSO (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 89.1% of the provenance of ΔfH° of SSO (g).
A total of 21 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
22.79446.1 SSO (g) → [SO]+ (g) S (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.745 ± 0.006 eVBerkowitz 1977a
11.89369.1 S (cr,l) O2 (g) → OSO (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -296.847 ± 0.200 kJ/molEckman 1929, note SO2
7.89448.8 OSO (g) + 3/2 S2 (g) → 2 SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.01 ± 0.40 (×1.164) kcal/molKarton 2011
6.39516.1 S (cr,l) + 3/2 O2 (g) H2O (cr,l) → OS(O)(OH)2 (aq, 115 H2O) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -143.85 ± 0.06 kcal/molGood 1960, CODATA Key Vals
4.89445.10 SSO (g) → SO (g) S (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 79.91 ± 0.30 kcal/molKarton 2006
4.69516.2 S (cr,l) + 3/2 O2 (g) H2O (cr,l) → OS(O)(OH)2 (aq, 115 H2O) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -143.92 ± 0.07 kcal/molMansson 1963, CODATA Key Vals
4.59440.10 SSO (g) → 2 S (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 203.57 ± 0.30 kcal/molKarton 2006
4.19448.9 OSO (g) + 3/2 S2 (g) → 2 SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.17 ± 0.25 (×2.538) kcal/molKarton 2006, Karton 2011
3.69447.10 SSO (g) → S2 (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 101.87 ± 0.30 (×1.114) kcal/molKarton 2006
2.39448.7 OSO (g) + 3/2 S2 (g) → 2 SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.90 ± 0.85 kcal/molKarton 2011
2.09448.6 OSO (g) + 3/2 S2 (g) → 2 SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.89 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
1.99354.2 S (cr,l) → S2 (g) ΔrG°(570 K) = 9.483 ± 0.138 (×1.915) kcal/molDrowart 1968, Detry 1967, 3rd Law
1.89555.1 S (cr,l) + 3/2 O2 (g) H2O (cr,l) → OS(O)(OH)2 (aq, 45 H2O) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -143.67 ± 0.11 kcal/molMcCullough 1957a
1.79389.1 SO (g) → S (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 43275 ± 5 cm-1Clerbaux 1994
1.69448.4 OSO (g) + 3/2 S2 (g) → 2 SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.01 ± 1.00 kcal/molRuscic G4
1.49354.4 S (cr,l) → S2 (g) ΔrG°(600 K) = 8.57 ± 0.29 (×1.044) kcal/molBraune 1951, West 1929, Gurvich TPIS, 3rd Law
1.39448.3 OSO (g) + 3/2 S2 (g) → 2 SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.09 ± 1.10 kcal/molRuscic G3X
1.39445.9 SSO (g) → SO (g) S (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 79.63 ± 0.56 kcal/molKarton 2011
1.39440.9 SSO (g) → 2 S (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 203.09 ± 0.56 kcal/molKarton 2011
1.39447.9 SSO (g) → S2 (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 101.81 ± 0.56 kcal/molKarton 2011

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of SSO (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.


Correlation
Coefficent
(%)
Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass
ATcT ID
70.4 Disulfur oxide cation[SSO]+ (g)S=[S+]=O970.53969.25± 0.60kJ/mol80.1309 ±
0.0120
135758-60-0*0
58.8 SulfurS (g)[S]276.83279.08± 0.14kJ/mol32.0660 ±
0.0060
7704-34-9*0
58.8 Monosulfur anionS- (g)[S-]76.4278.48± 0.14kJ/mol32.0665 ±
0.0060
14337-03-2*0
58.7 DisulfurS2 (g)S=S127.37127.68± 0.27kJ/mol64.1320 ±
0.0120
23550-45-0*0
58.7 Monosulfur cationS+ (g)[S+]1276.421278.21± 0.14kJ/mol32.0655 ±
0.0060
14701-12-3*0
57.7 Sulfur atom dication[S]+2 (g)[S++]3528.183531.88± 0.14kJ/mol32.0649 ±
0.0060
14127-58-3*0
56.5 Sulfur monoxideSO (g)S=O5.956.00± 0.13kJ/mol48.0654 ±
0.0060
13827-32-2*0
56.5 Sulfur dioxideOSO (g)O=S=O-294.20-296.74± 0.13kJ/mol64.0648 ±
0.0060
7446-09-5*0
56.0 Oxosulfur[SO]+ (g)[S+]=O999.26999.87± 0.13kJ/mol48.0649 ±
0.0060
767269-11-4*0
55.5 Sulfonyl cation[OSO]+ (g)O=[S+]=O897.01894.74± 0.13kJ/mol64.0643 ±
0.0060
12439-77-9*0

Most Influential reactions involving SSO (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.9519442.1 [SSO]- (g) → SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.877 ± 0.008 eVNimlos 1986
0.7749441.2 SSO (g) → [SSO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.584 ± 0.005 eVNorwood 1989a
0.6079452.5 SOS (g) → SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -65.03 ± 0.60 kcal/molDenis 2009a, est unc
0.3459446.1 SSO (g) → [SO]+ (g) S (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.745 ± 0.006 eVBerkowitz 1977a
0.2349450.4 O(SS) (g) → SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -44.68 ± 1.20 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.2009450.2 O(SS) (g) → SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -43.61 ± 1.30 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.1939441.1 SSO (g) → [SSO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.58 ± 0.01 eVBerkowitz 1977a
0.1729450.1 O(SS) (g) → SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -44.74 ± 1.40 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.1519452.4 SOS (g) → SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -65.38 ± 1.20 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.1329450.3 O(SS) (g) → SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -45.00 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.1219448.8 OSO (g) + 3/2 S2 (g) → 2 SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.01 ± 0.40 (×1.164) kcal/molKarton 2011
0.0749440.10 SSO (g) → 2 S (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 203.57 ± 0.30 kcal/molKarton 2006
0.0739445.10 SSO (g) → SO (g) S (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 79.91 ± 0.30 kcal/molKarton 2006
0.0659448.9 OSO (g) + 3/2 S2 (g) → 2 SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.17 ± 0.25 (×2.538) kcal/molKarton 2006, Karton 2011
0.0599447.10 SSO (g) → S2 (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 101.87 ± 0.30 (×1.114) kcal/molKarton 2006
0.0469452.6 SOS (g) → SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -67.00 ± 1.00 (×2.181) kcal/molGrant 2009
0.0369448.7 OSO (g) + 3/2 S2 (g) → 2 SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.90 ± 0.85 kcal/molKarton 2011
0.0329448.6 OSO (g) + 3/2 S2 (g) → 2 SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.89 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0269448.4 OSO (g) + 3/2 S2 (g) → 2 SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.01 ± 1.00 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0249442.9 [SSO]- (g) → SSO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.897 ± 0.050 eVRuscic W1RO


References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.172 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   K. L. Caster, N. A. Seifert, B. Ruscic, A. W. Jasper, and K. Prozument,
Dynamics of HCN, NHC, and HNCO Formation in the 193 nm Photodissociation of Formamide
J. Phys. Chem. A (in press) (2024) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c02232]
5   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.