Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.172 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.156 to include species relevant to a study of photodissociation of formamide[4].

Di-mu-hydrodihydrodisilicon anion

Formula: [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)

CAS RN: *129970-83-8

ATcT ID: *129970-83-8*2

SMILES: [SiH+]([H-]1)[H-][SiH]1

InChI: InChI=1S/H4Si2/c1-3-2-4-1/h1-2H/q-1

InChIKey: IUKDMLOUUGOMFU-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: H4Si2-

2D Image:

Aliases: [HSi(HSiHH)]-; Di-mu-hydrodihydrodisilicon anion; Di-mu-hydrodihydrodisilicon ion (1-); HSi(HSiHH)-

Relative Molecular Mass: 60.20331 ± 0.00066

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
296.7	289.2	± 3.5	kJ/mol

3D Image of [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 69.3% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis).
A total of 55 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
10.7	8647.4	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, cis-singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.924 ± 0.050 eV	Ruscic W1RO
7.9	8646.4	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.894 ± 0.050 eV	Ruscic W1RO
7.1	8647.2	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, cis-singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.933 ± 0.061 eV	Ruscic G4
5.9	8654.6	HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet) → SiH2SiH2 (g, singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -20.46 ± 0.70 kcal/mol	Dolgonos 2008, est unc
5.3	8646.2	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.905 ± 0.061 eV	Ruscic G4
3.7	8647.1	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, cis-singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.928 ± 0.085 eV	Ruscic G3X
3.5	8654.5	HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet) → SiH2SiH2 (g, singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -20.51 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Sari 2003, McCarthy 2006
3.1	8647.3	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, cis-singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.891 ± 0.092 eV	Ruscic CBS-n
2.7	8646.1	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.900 ± 0.085 eV	Ruscic G3X
2.3	8646.3	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.859 ± 0.092 eV	Ruscic CBS-n
2.0	8654.4	HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet) → SiH2SiH2 (g, singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -20.03 ± 1.2 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
1.9	8657.4	HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet) → 2 SiH2 (g, singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 40.33 ± 1.50 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
1.7	8655.6	HSi(HSiHH) (g, cis-singlet) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -2.60 ± 0.70 kcal/mol	Dolgonos 2008, est unc
1.7	8654.2	HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet) → SiH2SiH2 (g, singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -20.27 ± 1.3 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
1.7	8657.2	HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet) → 2 SiH2 (g, singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 39.45 ± 1.60 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
1.6	8491.1	Si (cr,l) + 2 F2 (g) → SiF4 (g)	Δ_rH°(298.15 K) = -385.98 ± 0.19 kcal/mol	Wise 1963, Wise 1963, Wise 1962
1.4	8654.1	HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet) → SiH2SiH2 (g, singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -20.41 ± 1.4 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
1.4	8657.1	HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet) → 2 SiH2 (g, singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 39.16 ± 1.72 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
1.4	8662.4	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans) → [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 687 ± 420 cm-1	Ruscic W1RO
1.2	8662.2	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans) → [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 715 ± 450 cm-1	Ruscic G4

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
86.5	Di-mu-hydrodihydrodisilicon anion	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans)	288.5	280.0	± 3.3	kJ/mol	60.20331 ± 0.00066	129970-83-81
86.5	Di-mu-hydrodihydrodisilicon anion	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g)	288.5	280.4	± 3.3	kJ/mol	60.20331 ± 0.00066	129970-83-80
72.1	Di-mu-hydrodihydrodisilicon	HSi(HSiHH) (g, cis-singlet)	385.7	375.3	± 2.6	kJ/mol	60.20276 ± 0.00066	129970-82-7*22
65.1	Di-mu-hydrodihydrodisilicon	HSi(HSiHH) (g)	374.8	364.5	± 2.3	kJ/mol	60.20276 ± 0.00066	129970-82-7*0
65.1	Di-mu-hydrodihydrodisilicon	HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans)	374.8	364.4	± 2.3	kJ/mol	60.20276 ± 0.00066	129970-82-7*1
65.1	Di-mu-hydrodihydrodisilicon	HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet)	374.8	364.4	± 2.3	kJ/mol	60.20276 ± 0.00066	129970-82-7*12
53.4	Di-mu-hydrodihydrodisilicon cation	[HSi(HSiHH)]+ (g, cis)	1194.4	1184.8	± 3.4	kJ/mol	60.20221 ± 0.00066	129970-82-72
47.4	Di-mu-hydrodihydrodisilicon cation	[HSi(HSiHH)]+ (g, trans)	1180.3	1172.7	± 3.2	kJ/mol	60.20221 ± 0.00066	129970-82-71
47.4	Di-mu-hydrodihydrodisilicon cation	[HSi(HSiHH)]+ (g)	1180.3	1172.7	± 3.2	kJ/mol	60.20221 ± 0.00066	129970-82-70
44.8	Disilene	SiH2SiH2 (g, singlet)	288.8	280.2	± 1.7	kJ/mol	60.20276 ± 0.00066	15435-77-5*2

Most Influential reactions involving [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.241	8647.4	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, cis-singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.924 ± 0.050 eV	Ruscic W1RO
0.184	8663.4	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans) + HSi(HSiHH) (g, cis-singlet) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet) + [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.70 ± 0.85 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.164	8663.1	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans) + HSi(HSiHH) (g, cis-singlet) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet) + [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.63 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.164	8663.2	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans) + HSi(HSiHH) (g, cis-singlet) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet) + [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.66 ± 0.90 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.162	8647.2	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, cis-singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.933 ± 0.061 eV	Ruscic G4
0.133	8663.3	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans) + HSi(HSiHH) (g, cis-singlet) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, trans-singlet) + [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = -0.72 ± 1.00 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.119	8662.4	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans) → [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 687 ± 420 cm-1	Ruscic W1RO
0.104	8662.2	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans) → [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 715 ± 450 cm-1	Ruscic G4
0.087	8662.1	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans) → [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 703 ± 490 cm-1	Ruscic G3X
0.083	8647.1	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, cis-singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.928 ± 0.085 eV	Ruscic G3X
0.071	8647.3	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis) → HSi(HSiHH) (g, cis-singlet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.891 ± 0.092 eV	Ruscic CBS-n
0.067	8662.3	[HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, trans) → [HSi(HSiHH)]- (g, cis)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 708 ± 560 cm-1	Ruscic CBS-n

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.172 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4		K. L. Caster, N. A. Seifert, B. Ruscic, A. W. Jasper, and K. Prozument, Dynamics of HCN, NHC, and HNCO Formation in the 193 nm Photodissociation of Formamide J. Phys. Chem. A (in press) (2024) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c02232]
5		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.