Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.172 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.156 to include species relevant to a study of photodissociation of formamide[4].

1,2-Dibromoethane

Formula: CH2BrCH2Br (g)
CAS RN: 106-93-4
ATcT ID: 106-93-4*0
SMILES: C(Br)CBr
InChI: InChI=1S/C2H4Br2/c3-1-2-4/h1-2H2
InChIKey: PAAZPARNPHGIKF-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Hills Formula: C2H4Br2

2D Image:

C(Br)CBr
Aliases: CH2BrCH2Br; 1,2-Dibromoethane; Dibromoethane; alpha,beta-Dibromoethane; 1,2-Ethylene dibromide; sym-Dibromoethane; s-Dibromoethane; Ethylene dibromide; Ethylene bromide; Ethane dibromide; 1,2-Bibromoethane; Glycol dibromide; Glycol bromide; NCI-C00522; RCRA U067; UN 1605; Aadibroom; Bromofume; Iscobrome D; Nefis; Nephis; Sanhyuum; Soilfume; Soilbrom; Dowfume; Celmide; Fumo-gas; Kopfume; Pestmaster; Unifume; EDB; DBE; ENT 15349; CBrH2CBrH2; (CH2Br)2; (CBrH2)2
Relative Molecular Mass: 187.8612 ± 0.0026

   ΔfH°(0 K)   ΔfH°(298.15 K)UncertaintyUnits
-11.5-38.3± 1.2kJ/mol

3D Image of CH2BrCH2Br (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of CH2BrCH2Br (g)

The 4 contributors listed below account for 90.2% of the provenance of ΔfH° of CH2BrCH2Br (g).

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
74.87589.1 CH2CH2 (g) Br2 (g) → CH2BrCH2Br (g) ΔrH°(355 K) = -29.058 ± 0.300 kcal/molConn 1938
6.37590.2 CH2BrCH2Br (g) CH3CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2Br (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.41 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
5.27590.1 CH2BrCH2Br (g) CH3CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2Br (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.35 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
3.77590.3 CH2BrCH2Br (g) CH3CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2Br (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -1.72 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of CH2BrCH2Br (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.


Correlation
Coefficent
(%)
Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass
ATcT ID
99.5 1,2-DibromoethaneCH2BrCH2Br (cr,l)C(Br)CBr-80.1± 1.2kJ/mol187.8612 ±
0.0026
106-93-4*500
89.3 1,1-DibromoethaneCH3CHBr2 (cr,l)CC(Br)Br-67.0± 1.3kJ/mol187.8612 ±
0.0026
557-91-5*500
17.0 1,1-DibromoethaneCH3CHBr2 (g)CC(Br)Br-4.8-31.8± 1.8kJ/mol187.8612 ±
0.0026
557-91-5*0
12.4 Ethyl bromideCH3CH2Br (g)CCBr-41.00-62.94± 0.24kJ/mol108.9651 ±
0.0019
74-96-4*0
11.7 Ethyl bromideCH3CH2Br (l)CCBr-55.40-90.93± 0.25kJ/mol108.9651 ±
0.0019
74-96-4*500
9.6 EthyleneCH2CH2 (g)C=C60.8952.38± 0.11kJ/mol28.0532 ±
0.0016
74-85-1*0
9.6 Ethylene cation[CH2CH2]+ (g)C=[CH2+]1075.201067.99± 0.11kJ/mol28.0526 ±
0.0016
34470-02-5*0
9.4 DibromineBr2 (g)BrBr45.7030.90± 0.11kJ/mol159.8080 ±
0.0020
7726-95-6*0
9.4 Bromine atomBr (g)[Br]117.925111.863± 0.055kJ/mol79.90400 ±
0.00100
10097-32-2*0
9.4 Bromine atomBr (g, 2P3/2)[Br]117.925111.863± 0.055kJ/mol79.90400 ±
0.00100
10097-32-2*1

Most Influential reactions involving CH2BrCH2Br (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.7627589.1 CH2CH2 (g) Br2 (g) → CH2BrCH2Br (g) ΔrH°(355 K) = -29.058 ± 0.300 kcal/molConn 1938
0.6907592.2 CH2BrCH2Br (cr,l) → CH2BrCH2Br (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 41.78 ± 0.13 kJ/molSvoboda 1992
0.2917592.1 CH2BrCH2Br (cr,l) → CH2BrCH2Br (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 41.74 ± 0.20 kJ/molMajer 1985, Wadso 1968
0.1207595.3 CH3CHBr2 (g) → CH2BrCH2Br (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -1.28 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.1037595.2 CH3CHBr2 (g) → CH2BrCH2Br (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -1.39 ± 1.4 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0797595.4 CH3CHBr2 (g) → CH2BrCH2Br (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -2.89 ± 1.6 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0747590.2 CH2BrCH2Br (g) CH3CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2Br (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.41 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0617590.1 CH2BrCH2Br (g) CH3CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2Br (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.35 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0447590.3 CH2BrCH2Br (g) CH3CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2Br (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -1.72 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0177592.3 CH2BrCH2Br (cr,l) → CH2BrCH2Br (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 41.72 ± 0.81 kJ/molVarushchenko 2007


References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.172 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   K. L. Caster, N. A. Seifert, B. Ruscic, A. W. Jasper, and K. Prozument,
Dynamics of HCN, NHC, and HNCO Formation in the 193 nm Photodissociation of Formamide
J. Phys. Chem. A (in press) (2024) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c02232]
5   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
6   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.