Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.156 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.148 to include species relevant to a recent study of the oxidation of ethylene [4] as well as new measurements that led to refining the thermochemistry of CF and SiF and their cations [5].

Vinylidene anion

Formula: [CCH2]- (g)

CAS RN: 66295-36-1

ATcT ID: 66295-36-1*0

SMILES: [C-]=C

InChI: InChI=1S/C2H2/c1-2/h1H2/q-1

InChIKey: VSVANFQZMKLBSU-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hills Formula: C2H2-

2D Image:

Aliases: [CCH2]-; Vinylidene anion; Vinylidene ion (1-); Ethenylidene anion; Ethenylidene ion (1-); Methylenecarbene anion; Methylenecarbene ion (1-); Methylidenecarbene anion; Methylidenecarbene ion (1-); CCH2-; [CH2C]-; CH2C-; [H2CC]-; H2CC-

Relative Molecular Mass: 26.0378 ± 0.0016

Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units
364.28	364.09	± 0.31	kJ/mol

3D Image of [CCH2]- (g)

spin ON spin OFF

Top contributors to the provenance of Δ_fH° of [CCH2]- (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 75.2% of the provenance of Δ_fH° of [CCH2]- (g).
A total of 116 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution (%)	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
15.8	2608.1	HCCH (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 43.53 ± 0.15 kcal/mol	Lee 2013
5.7	2600.1	[CCH2]- (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.4866 ± 0.0008 eV	DeVine 2017
5.7	2608.4	HCCH (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 43.62 ± 0.25 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
5.7	2608.5	HCCH (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 43.62 ± 0.25 kcal/mol	Karton 2006, Karton 2008
4.5	2598.12	CCH2 (g) → 2 C (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 345.10 ± 0.30 kcal/mol	Karton 2008
4.5	2598.11	CCH2 (g) → 2 C (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 345.10 ± 0.30 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
4.4	2610.9	CH2CH2 (g) → CCH2 (g) + H2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 83.71 ± 0.30 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
4.0	2609.12	CCH2 (g) → CCH (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 88.02 ± 0.30 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
3.4	2549.9	CH2CH (g) → CCH2 (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 77.96 ± 0.30 kcal/mol	Karton 2008
3.4	2549.8	CH2CH (g) → CCH2 (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 77.96 ± 0.30 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
3.1	2610.11	CH2CH2 (g) → CCH2 (g) + H2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 350.63 ± 1.5 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
2.8	2609.13	CCH2 (g) → CCH (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 368.45 ± 1.5 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
2.7	2607.10	HCCH (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 182.22 ± 1.5 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
2.2	2608.3	HCCH (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 43.59 ± 0.40 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
1.2	2598.10	CCH2 (g) → 2 C (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 344.97 ± 0.56 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
1.2	2610.8	CH2CH2 (g) → CCH2 (g) + H2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 83.78 ± 0.56 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
1.1	2609.11	CCH2 (g) → CCH (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 88.08 ± 0.56 kcal/mol	Karton 2011
1.0	7587.6	CH2CCHO (g) → CCH2 (g) + HCO (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 274.15 ± 2.0 kJ/mol	Klippenstein 2017
1.0	2608.6	HCCH (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 15199 ± 205 cm-1	Stanton 1999
0.9	2549.7	CH2CH (g) → CCH2 (g) + H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 78.01 ± 0.56 kcal/mol	Karton 2011

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the Δ_fH° of [CCH2]- (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation Coefficent (%)	Species Name	Formula	Δ_fH°(0 K)	Δ_fH°(298.15 K)	Uncertainty	Units	Relative Molecular Mass	ATcT ID
96.8	Vinylidene	CCH2 (g)	411.24	412.15	± 0.30	kJ/mol	26.0373 ± 0.0016	2143-69-3*0
75.8	Vinylidene	CCH2 (g, triplet)	610.65	610.36	± 0.39	kJ/mol	26.0373 ± 0.0016	2143-69-3*1
28.9	Acetylene	HCCH (g)	228.89	228.33	± 0.12	kJ/mol	26.0373 ± 0.0016	74-86-2*0
28.9	Acetylene cation	[HCCH]+ (g)	1328.90	1328.24	± 0.12	kJ/mol	26.0367 ± 0.0016	25641-79-6*0
22.9	Ethynylium	[CCH]+ (g)	1687.64	1690.98	± 0.15	kJ/mol	25.0288 ± 0.0016	16456-59-0*0
22.7	Ethynyl	CCH (g)	563.77	567.88	± 0.15	kJ/mol	25.0293 ± 0.0016	2122-48-7*0
21.7	Carbon	C (g)	711.400	716.885	± 0.040	kJ/mol	12.01070 ± 0.00080	7440-44-0*0
21.7	Carbon	C (g, triplet)	711.400	716.885	± 0.040	kJ/mol	12.01070 ± 0.00080	7440-44-0*1
21.7	Carbon cation	C+ (g)	1797.853	1803.451	± 0.040	kJ/mol	12.01015 ± 0.00080	14067-05-1*0
21.7	Carbon	C (g, quintuplet)	1114.963	1120.109	± 0.040	kJ/mol	12.01070 ± 0.00080	7440-44-0*3

Most Influential reactions involving [CCH2]- (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence Coefficient	TN ID	Reaction	Measured Quantity	Reference
0.963	2600.1	[CCH2]- (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.4866 ± 0.0008 eV	DeVine 2017
0.782	2605.1	[CCH2]- (g) → CCH2 (g, triplet)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 20602 ± 24 cm-1	DeVine 2016, note unc
0.017	2600.2	[CCH2]- (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.490 ± 0.006 eV	Ervin 1990, Ervin 1989
0.002	2602.8	[CCH2]- (g) → 2 C (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 356.35 ± 1.50 kcal/mol	Ruscic W1RO
0.002	2602.4	[CCH2]- (g) → 2 C (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 357.48 ± 1.60 kcal/mol	Ruscic G4
0.002	2602.7	[CCH2]- (g) → 2 C (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 355.70 ± 1.60 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.001	2602.3	[CCH2]- (g) → 2 C (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 356.92 ± 1.72 kcal/mol	Ruscic G3X
0.001	2600.4	[CCH2]- (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.47 ± 0.02 eV	Burnett 1983
0.001	2602.6	[CCH2]- (g) → 2 C (g) + 2 H (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 355.09 ± 2.16 kcal/mol	Ruscic CBS-n
0.001	2600.3	[CCH2]- (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.484 ± 0.025 eV	Gerardi 2010, est unc
0.000	2611.2	[CCH2]- (g) + H2O (g) → CH2CH (g) + [OH]- (g)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = 6 ± 3 (×1.022) kcal/mol	Guo 1990
0.000	2612.1	[CCH2]- (g) + CH3OH (g) → CH2CH (g) + [CH3O]- (g)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = -2.3 ± 2.3 (×1.682) kcal/mol	Ervin 1990, Ervin 2002, DeTuri 1999
0.000	2611.1	[CCH2]- (g) + H2O (g) → CH2CH (g) + [OH]- (g)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = 5.8 ± 2.3 (×1.414) kcal/mol	Ervin 1990, Ervin 2002, DeTuri 1999
0.000	2612.2	[CCH2]- (g) + CH3OH (g) → CH2CH (g) + [CH3O]- (g)	Δ_rG°(298.15 K) = -3 ± 3 (×1.509) kcal/mol	Guo 1990
0.000	2600.12	[CCH2]- (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.495 ± 0.050 eV	Ruscic W1RO
0.000	2600.8	[CCH2]- (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.527 ± 0.061 eV	Ruscic G4
0.000	2600.7	[CCH2]- (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.499 ± 0.085 eV	Ruscic G3X
0.000	2600.11	[CCH2]- (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.506 ± 0.090 eV	Ruscic CBS-n
0.000	2600.10	[CCH2]- (g) → CCH2 (g)	Δ_rH°(0 K) = 0.496 ± 0.092 eV	Ruscic CBS-n

References

1		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner, Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2		B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner, Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21^st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.156 of the Thermochemical Network (2024); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4		N. A. Seifert, B. Ruscic, R. Sivaramakrishnan, and K. Prozument, The C2H4O Isomers in the Oxidation of Ethylene J. Mol. Spectrosc. 398, 111847/1-8 (2023) [DOI: 10.1016/j.jms.2023.111847]
5		U. Jacovella, B. Ruscic, N. L. Chen, H.-L. Le, S. Boyé-Péronne, S. Hartweg, M. Roy-Chowdhury, G. A. Garcia, J.-C. Loison, and B. Gans, Refining Thermochemical Properties of CF, SiF, and Their Cations by Combining Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Quantum Chemical Calculations, and the Active Thermochemical Tables Approach Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 30838-30847 (2023) [DOI: 10.1039/D3CP04244H]
6		B. Ruscic, Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
7		B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Thermochemistry Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula

The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties

The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6] and Ruscic and Bross[7]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.000₅ kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits

The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.