Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.148 of the Thermochemical Network [3]This version of ATcT results[3] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.140 to include species relevant to a recent study of the role of atmospheric methanediol[4].
|
Hydrogen fluoride |
Formula: HF (aq, 7500 H2O) |
CAS RN: 7664-39-3 |
ATcT ID: 7664-39-3*847 |
SMILES: F |
InChI: InChI=1S/FH/h1H |
InChIKey: KRHYYFGTRYWZRS-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
Hills Formula: F1H1 |
2D Image: |
|
Aliases: HF; Hydrogen fluoride; Hydrogen monofluoride; Hydrofluoric acid; Fluorhydric acid; Fluorohydric acid; Fluorohydrogen; Fluoric acid; Fluorine hydride; Fluorine monohydride |
Relative Molecular Mass: 20.006343 ± 0.000070 |
ΔfH°(0 K) | ΔfH°(298.15 K) | Uncertainty | Units |
---|
| -325.00 | ± 0.17 | kJ/mol |
|
Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of HF (aq, 7500 H2O)The 14 contributors listed below account for 90.2% of the provenance of ΔfH° of HF (aq, 7500 H2O).
Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.
|
Contribution (%) | TN ID | Reaction | Measured Quantity | Reference | 37.5 | 530.1 | HF (aq, 5500 H2O) → HF (aq, 7500 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -0.43 ± 0.10 kJ/mol | Paulechka 2020 | 21.1 | 528.1 | HF (l) → HF (aq, 5500 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -5.1110 ± 0.0220 kcal/mol | Johnson 1973, Paulechka 2020 | 8.1 | 544.2 | H2O (cr,l) + F2 (g) → 2 HF (aq, 5 H2O) + 1/2 O2 (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -356.66 ± 0.40 kJ/mol | Paulechka 2020, Johnson 1987, Vorobev 1960, Hummel 1959, Johnson 1973 | 4.6 | 537.3 | HF (g) → HF (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -14.81 ± 0.10 kcal/mol | Vanderzee 1971, Westrum 1949, Davis 1961, Ruterjans 1969 | 3.0 | 8200.1 | SiO2 (vitr) + 2 F2 (g) → SiF4 (g) + O2 (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -170.04 ± 0.25 kcal/mol | Wise 1963, Wise 1963 | 2.7 | 486.1 | 1/2 H2 (g) + 1/2 F2 (g) → HF (l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -303.56 ± 0.27 (×1.325) kJ/mol | Settle 1994, Johnson 1973, note HF | 2.3 | 536.1 | HF (g) + [OH]- (aq) → F- (aq) + H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -28.065 ± 0.10 (×1.414) kcal/mol | Vanderzee 1971 | 2.1 | 543.1 | H2O (cr,l) + F2 (g) → 2 HF (aq, 3 H2O) + 1/2 O2 (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -355.46 ± 0.80 kJ/mol | Paulechka 2020, Good 1966, Gunn 1965, Johnson 1966, Domalski 1967a, Gross 1967 | 2.1 | 546.1 | SiF4 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) → Si (cr,l) + O2 (g) + 4 HF (aq, 5 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 899.77 ± 1.20 kJ/mol | Paulechka 2020, Vorobev 1960, Hummel 1959, Johnson 1987, Good 1964, Good 1964, Johnson 1973 | 1.5 | 8199.1 | SiO2 (cr,l) + 2 F2 (g) → SiF4 (g) + O2 (g)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -168.26 ± 0.28 (×1.269) kcal/mol | Wise 1963, Wise 1963 | 1.2 | 529.1 | HF (aq, 5500 H2O) → HF (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -10.16 ± 0.10 kJ/mol | Paulechka 2020, Hefter 1984, Kleboth 1970, Baumann 1969, Hepler 1953, Ellis 1963, Broene 1947, Hamer 1970 | 1.2 | 545.1 | SiF4 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) → SiO2 (cr, quartz) + 4 HF (aq, 5 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -11.11 ± 0.37 kJ/mol | Paulechka 2020, Vorobev 1960, Hummel 1959, Johnson 1987, Good 1964, Good 1964, Kilday 1973, Kilday 1973, Johnson 1973 | 1.1 | 537.2 | HF (g) → HF (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -14.75 ± 0.20 kcal/mol | Hood 1951, Vanderzee 1971, Parker 1965, est unc | 1.1 | 537.1 | HF (g) → HF (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -14.82 ± 0.20 kcal/mol | Khaidukov 1936, Vanderzee 1971, Parker 1965, est unc |
|
Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of HF (aq, 7500 H2O) |
Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances. The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.
|
Correlation Coefficent (%) | Species Name | Formula | Image | ΔfH°(0 K) | ΔfH°(298.15 K) | Uncertainty | Units | Relative Molecular Mass | ATcT ID | 79.0 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 5500 H2O) | | | -324.57 | ± 0.13 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*955 | 62.4 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 100000 H2O) | | | -330.14 | ± 0.17 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*861 | 62.4 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 50000 H2O) | | | -328.59 | ± 0.17 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*855 | 62.4 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 20000 H2O) | | | -326.67 | ± 0.17 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*852 | 62.4 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 10000 H2O) | | | -325.44 | ± 0.17 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*850 | 62.4 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 500000 H2O) | | | -333.06 | ± 0.17 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*866 | 61.1 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq) | | | -334.70 | ± 0.15 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*800 | 61.1 | Fluoride | F- (aq) | | | -334.70 | ± 0.15 | kJ/mol | 18.99895178 ± 0.00000050 | 16984-48-8*800 | 57.8 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (l) | | | -303.21 | ± 0.11 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*590 | 57.5 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 300 H2O) | | | -322.17 | ± 0.11 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*831 |
|
Most Influential reactions involving HF (aq, 7500 H2O)Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.
|
|
|
References
|
1
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004)
[DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
|
2
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005)
[DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
|
3
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.148 of the Thermochemical Network (2023); available at ATcT.anl.gov |
4
|
|
T. L. Nguyen, J. Peeters, J.-F. Müller, A. Perera, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton,
Methanediol from Cloud-Processed Formaldehyde is Only a Minor Source of Atmospheric Formic Acid
Natl. Acad. Sci. 120, e2304650120/1-8 (2023)
[DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2304650120]
|
5
|
|
B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014)
[DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
|
6
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019)
[DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]
|
|
|
Formula
|
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
|
|
Uncertainties
|
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [5] and Ruscic and Bross[6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
|
|
Website Functionality Credits
|
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
|
|
Acknowledgement
|
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.
|